1_eolienneFlottante
π Energy
Offshore wind: drop in the ocean or energy tsunami?

Offshore wind turbines : “cheap, green energy with great potential”

with Anaïs Marechal, science journalist
On January 19th, 2022 |
4min reading time
Daniel Averbuch
Daniel Averbuch
Engineer at IFP Énergies nouvelles
Key takeaways
  • In France, le Réseau de Transport d’Électricité (RTE) forecasts an offshore wind capacity of 22 to 62 GW by 2050. By then, the existing nuclear fleet will see its capacity fall from around 60 GW to 16 GW as older plants close.
  • More specifically, the International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that offshore wind power could produce 420,000 TWh of electricity each year, or 11 times the global electricity demand in 2040.
  • Thanks to these advantages, the offshore wind sector is expanding rapidly. The global installed capacity has increased from 3 GW in 2010 to 23 GW in 2018. Europe dominates the market, accounting for 80% of installed capacity.
  • The call for tenders for the Dunkirk wind farm in 2019 revealed that production costs are falling faster than expected: the price per MWh is €44, compared with around €65 for onshore wind power and €40-70 for ground-based solar photovoltaic power.

Since the Paris Agree­ments were adop­ted in 2015, the inter­na­tio­nal objec­tives in the fight against cli­mate change have been clear : to aim for car­bon neu­tra­li­ty by mid-cen­tu­ry. It is impos­sible to achieve this ener­gy tran­si­tion goal without the mas­sive deve­lop­ment of rene­wable ener­gies. Off­shore wind power is at the fore­front : all pro­jec­tions show that the sec­tor, which cur­rent­ly accounts for only 0.3% of glo­bal elec­tri­ci­ty pro­duc­tion, will dra­ma­ti­cal­ly evolve. In France, the RTE des­cribes the sec­tor as “one of the most pro­mi­sing for long-term low-car­bon elec­tri­ci­ty pro­duc­tion”1. The UK is the cham­pion to date : ins­tal­led off­shore wind capa­ci­ty is 10.4 GW (com­pa­red to 14 GW onshore), and the coun­try is tar­ge­ting 40 GW by 20302. Even though no wind farms are cur­rent­ly ope­ra­tio­nal in France, RTE fore­casts off­shore wind capa­ci­ty of 22 to 62 GW by 2050. By then, the his­to­ri­cal nuclear fleet (exis­ting infra­struc­ture) will see its capa­ci­ty decrease, due to the clo­sure of ageing plants – i.e. second gene­ra­tion reac­tors built in the 1980s. It will reduce from about 60 GW of cur­rent pro­duc­tion to 24 GW, or even 16 GW, depen­ding on the sce­na­rios in which nuclear power still has a place in the ener­gy mix.

Huge potential for offshore wind

Wind tur­bines can be fixed to the sea­bed at depths of up to 50 metres or beyond that on a moo­red floa­ting base. “For eco­no­mic rea­sons, off­shore wind tur­bines are best ins­tal­led in areas in which the ave­rage annual wind speed is at least 8 metres per second,” explains Daniel Aver­buch. “This limi­ta­tion, toge­ther with the mini­mum depth requi­re­ment, results in an enor­mous tech­ni­cal poten­tial.” More pre­ci­se­ly, the IEA esti­mates3 the poten­tial of off­shore wind power at 420,000 TWh of elec­tri­ci­ty per year, that is, 11 times the glo­bal demand for elec­tri­ci­ty in 2040.

“The unit power of off­shore wind tur­bines is cur­rent­ly 10 MW, and the indus­try is aiming for 15 MW or more by the end of the decade,” explains Daniel Aver­buch. “This is much more than onshore wind tur­bines, which are smal­ler so as to limit visual impact for near­by resi­dents and which have a unit power of around 3 MW”. Ano­ther advan­tage of off­shore wind power is the load fac­tor. This para­me­ter repre­sents the ratio bet­ween the elec­tri­ci­ty actual­ly pro­du­ced and the theo­re­ti­cal power of the tur­bine. It is often a pro­blem for rene­wable ener­gies that rely on inter­mit­tent sources such as sun­shine or wind.

But off­shore wind tur­bines out­per­form all other forms of elec­tri­ci­ty gene­ra­tion except nuclear ener­gy : new wind farms have an ave­rage load fac­tor of 40–50%, com­pa­red to 25% for onshore wind tur­bines in France and 14% for solar pho­to­vol­taic panels4. The Hywind Scot­land wind farm has even set a new record with an annual ave­rage of 57%!5 “This can be explai­ned by the nature of the winds, which are stron­ger and more regu­lar at sea, but also by the desi­gn choices made for off­shore wind tur­bines,” explains Daniel Aver­buch. Europe has a prime loca­tion : in the North Sea, the Bal­tic Sea, the Bay of Bis­cay, the Irish Sea and the Nor­we­gian Sea, winds reach load fac­tors of 45 to 65%, com­pa­red to 35 to 45% for Chi­na or Japan and 40 to 55% for the Uni­ted States.

This grea­ter pro­duc­tion sta­bi­li­ty makes off­shore wind an inter­es­ting choice for the balance of the ener­gy mix. Moreo­ver, pro­duc­tion is com­ple­men­ta­ry to that of other rene­wable ener­gies : in Europe, Chi­na and the Uni­ted States, it is more impor­tant in win­ter, unlike that pro­du­ced by pho­to­vol­taic panels.

Towards mature technology

Thanks to these advan­tages, off­shore wind is rapid­ly expan­ding. Glo­bal ins­tal­led capa­ci­ty has grown from 3 GW in 2010 to 23 GW in 2018, out­pa­cing all other sources of elec­tri­ci­ty except pho­to­vol­taics. Europe, led by the UK, domi­nates the mar­ket, accoun­ting for 80% of ins­tal­led capa­ci­ty in 2018. Chi­na could take the lead by 2030, howe­ver, increa­sing its ins­tal­led capa­ci­ty from 5 to 36 GW. In France, Ademe esti­mates the eco­no­mic poten­tial of off­shore wind power at 924 mil­lion euros a year in added value by 2030, with 11,300 direct jobs being crea­ted each year.

For years, the cost of off­shore wind power has been an obs­tacle : the ave­rage pro­duc­tion costs of onshore wind power in France are esti­ma­ted at around €100/MWh, com­pa­red to €79–149/MWh for hydro, €50–70/MWh for onshore wind, €45–81/MWh for ground-based solar pho­to­vol­taic or €43.8–64.8/MWh for nuclear (depen­ding on the method of cal­cu­la­tion used). Howe­ver, the ten­der for the Dun­kerque wind farm in 2019 shows a fas­ter than expec­ted decrease in costs 6 : the price per MWh for this ten­der is €44. 7Pro­duc­tion costs could even fall to €25–30 per MWh by 2030. For Daniel Aver­buch, this signi­fi­cant decrease is explai­ned by “the grea­ter matu­ri­ty of the indus­try, which reduces the cost of bank loans. The increase in the size of off­shore wind tur­bines also makes it pos­sible to pro­duce more with fewer tur­bines,” he adds, “and the­re­fore to reduce invest­ment and main­te­nance costs.”

Obstacles to overcome

It will not be all plain sai­ling though : the suc­cess of off­shore wind power will depend will depend on over­co­ming cer­tain dif­fi­cul­ties. “The increase in elec­tri­ci­ty pro­duc­tion will require stron­ger elec­tri­ci­ty trans­port net­works,” explains Daniel Aver­buch. “Off­shore wind power concen­trates elec­tri­ci­ty pro­duc­tion in cer­tain geo­gra­phi­cal regions : it requires the dis­si­pa­tion of large quan­ti­ty of ener­gy, unlike onshore wind power or pho­to­vol­taics, which are more dis­tri­bu­ted.” Ano­ther impor­tant point : the mate­rials nee­ded to build wind tur­bines. Daniel Aver­buch adds : “The resources of cri­ti­cal metals and rare earths requi­red for the ener­gy tran­si­tion are the sub­ject of pros­pec­tive work, par­ti­cu­lar­ly within the IFPEN8. Howe­ver, wind ener­gy, which requires rare earths for per­ma­nent magnets, only repre­sents a small share of the glo­bal market.”

Final­ly, floa­ting off­shore wind – ins­tal­led in areas dee­per than 50 metres – is sub­ject to grea­ter uncer­tain­ty. About 70% of the world’s pro­duc­tion poten­tial is based on this type of wind tur­bine. The tech­no­lo­gy is less mature and no floa­ting farms have yet rea­ched the com­mer­cial stage. But even if no floa­ting wind farms were to be built, this would not herald the death knell of off­shore wind farms. The poten­tial of ins­tal­led wind tur­bines alone sur­passes the pro­jec­ted glo­bal demand for elec­tri­ci­ty by 2040.

The envi­ron­men­tal impact of off­shore wind tur­bines is weak, accor­ding to a Life Cycle Assess­ment (LCA). The LCA takes into account trans­port, manu­fac­tu­ring, ins­tal­la­tion, use and the tur­bines’ end of life. In 2015, Ademe esti­ma­ted the emis­sion rate of French wind farms at 14.8 grams of CO2 equi­va­lent per kWh9 over a life­time of 20 years. A recent stu­dy on floa­ting wind tur­bines eva­luates their LCA at 19.5 g CO2 equivalent/kWh for a 25-year life span10. These values are com­pa­rable to onshore wind (14.1 g CO2 equivalent/kWh), lower than Chi­nese-made pho­to­vol­taics (56 g CO2 equivalent/kWh) and much lower than emis­sions from a gas-fired power plant (418 g CO2 equivalent/kWh) but still higher than nuclear (less than 6 g CO2 equivalent/kWh)1112.

1RTE, Futurs éner­gé­tiques 2050, octobre 2021
2https://​www​.great​.gov​.uk/​i​n​t​e​r​n​a​t​i​o​n​a​l​/​c​o​n​t​e​n​t​/​i​n​v​e​s​t​m​e​n​t​/​s​e​c​t​o​r​s​/​o​f​f​s​h​o​r​e​-​wind/
3Agence Inter­na­tio­nale de l’Énergie, Off­shore Wind Out­look 2019, World ener­gy out­look spe­cial report
4https://​www​.equi​nor​.com/​e​n​/​n​e​w​s​/​2​0​2​1​0​3​2​3​-​h​y​w​i​n​d​-​s​c​o​t​l​a​n​d​-​u​k​-​b​e​s​t​-​p​e​r​f​o​r​m​i​n​g​-​o​f​f​s​h​o​r​e​-​w​i​n​d​-​f​a​r​m​.html, consul­té le 7 jan­vier 2021
5Ademe, Éolien off­shore : ana­lyse des poten­tiels indus­triels et éco­no­miques en France, décembre 2019
6Ademe, Éolien off­shore : ana­lyse des poten­tiels indus­triels et éco­no­miques en France, décembre 2019
7www​.eolien​ne​sen​mer​.fr, consul­té le 7 jan­vier 2021
8https://​www​.ifpe​ner​gies​nou​velles​.fr/​t​a​g​s​/​m​e​t​a​u​x​-​c​r​i​t​i​q​u​e​s​-​e​t​-​t​e​r​r​e​s​-​rares
9Ademe, Impacts envi­ron­ne­men­taux de l’éolien fran­çais, 2015
10Com­mis­sion natio­nale du débat public, BL Évo­lu­tion, Ana­lyse biblio­gra­phique des bilans car­bones de l’éolien flot­tant, décembre 2021
11https://​bilans​-ges​.ademe​.fr
12https://​www​.sfen​.org/​r​g​n​/​l​e​s​-​e​m​i​s​s​i​o​n​s​-​c​a​r​b​o​n​e​-​d​u​-​n​u​c​l​e​a​i​r​e​-​f​r​a​n​c​a​i​s​-​3​7​g​-​d​e​-​c​o​2​-​l​e​-kwh/

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate