1_cryomicroscopie
π Health and biotech π Science and technology
Biomolecules: three techniques at the cutting edge of research

Cryogenic electron microscopy: the resolution revolution?

with Pierre-Damien Coureux , Assistant Professor in Electron Microscopy at BIOC* at École Polytechnique (IP Paris)
On April 20th, 2022 |
5min reading time
Pierre-Damien COUREUX
Pierre-Damien Coureux
Assistant Professor in Electron Microscopy at BIOC* at École Polytechnique (IP Paris)
Key takeaways
  • Modern structural biology was born in the 1950s with the first publication of the DNA double helix structure and the first structures of proteins, which were awarded two Nobel prizes in 1962.
  • Although the first electron microscopes existed well before the 1950s and made it possible to observe materials at high resolution, for a long time the molecules of living organisms remained difficult to observe with this technique. In biology, this structural approach was thus often considered to be a big magnifying glass.
  • Over the last ten years or so, the technique has made revolutionary advances, allowing molecules to be seen at the atomic scale and as small as haemoglobin.
  • If Covid had appeared 15 years ago, researchers would never have been able to obtain its structure so quickly.
  • The next challenge is to see the interior of cells in sufficient detail to locate all the known atomic models of life and to understand their interactions.

“To under­stand, we must observe,” that’s the motto of mod­ern struc­tur­al bio­logy. It is a field that aims to obtain the struc­ture of bio­lo­gic­al objects to bet­ter under­stand the role of a par­tic­u­lar molecule in a cell. This mod­ern struc­tur­al bio­logy was born in 1953 with the pub­lic­a­tion of the struc­ture of the DNA double helix by Wat­son and Crick1 and a few years later with the first pro­tein struc­tures by Kendrew and Per­utz. Since then, struc­tur­al bio­logy has provided research­ers with valu­able inform­a­tion for under­stand­ing and pro­tect­ing life.

A complex history

Tech­niques avail­able for resolv­ing the 3D struc­ture of bio­lo­gic­al objects become avail­able and evolved in turn. X‑ray crys­tal­lo­graphy, already mastered in the 1910s, under­went a revolu­tion in the 1990s thanks, among oth­er things, to the use of crys­tal cryo­gen­ics and the qual­ity of syn­chro­trons that gen­er­ate X‑rays. Nuc­le­ar mag­net­ic res­on­ance, dis­covered by chance in the 1940s, emerged in struc­tur­al bio­logy in the 2000s and is still used today, espe­cially to study the dynam­ics of pro­teins. For a long time, elec­tron micro­scopy (which was born in the 1930s) was con­sidered in bio­logy as a pair of bin­ocu­lars to see the infin­itely small but without provid­ing high-res­ol­u­tion struc­tur­al information.

The prob­lem: the molecules of liv­ing organ­isms are min­is­cule. For example, the SARS-CoV­‑2 Spike pro­tein weighs ~180–200 kDa2 – equi­val­ent to three haemo­globin molecules3. Elec­tron micro­scopy images have a lot of noise due to the inter­ac­tion of the elec­tron beam of the micro­scope with the sample. As a res­ult, noth­ing can be seen on the images if the object observed is too small. It is only in the last ten years or so that a revolu­tion has taken place. The design of micro­scopes has been improved. Also, the qual­ity and speed of the detect­ors used have made it pos­sible to record bet­ter qual­ity images, the soft­ware used to help pro­cess the data is more intu­it­ive and more effi­cient, and the speed of cer­tain cal­cu­la­tions has been improved by a factor of 50 thanks to com­puter graph­ics cards. If the SARS-CoV­‑2 pan­dem­ic had appeared some 15 years ago, we would nev­er have been able to obtain its struc­ture so quickly and so precisely!

Better and faster

Elec­tron micro­scopy ori­gin­ated in Ger­many and was first used in phys­ics. Bio­logy benefited from devel­op­ments in phys­ics and the first images of bio­lo­gic­al samples date from the 1950s. It was not until 1968 that the Amer­ic­ans Rosi­er and Klug demon­strated that 2D images taken with an elec­tron micro­scope could be used to trace the 3D struc­ture of the object stud­ied. The first struc­ture of a mem­brane pro­tein came from a bac­teri­um. It dates back to 1975 and was made by Brit­ish pion­eers Unwin and Hende­r­son (see photo below). Hende­r­son received a Nobel Prize in 2017 for his pion­eer­ing work over 40 years with research­ers Frank and Dubochet.

First mem­brane pro­tein struc­ture obtained in 1975 at 7Å res­ol­u­tion, a record for the time4.

It took anoth­er 40 years to obtain the almost-atom­ic res­ol­u­tion (3Å aver­age res­ol­u­tion) of the human ribo­some (made up of sev­er­al strands of RNA and about fifty pro­teins). Today, more than 10 struc­tures per day are depos­ited in research­er data­bases and more than 20% of them are high-res­ol­u­tion data.

High res­ol­u­tion human ribo­some mod­el first obtained in 20155.

As early as Janu­ary 2022, the pre­cise struc­ture of the Spike pro­tein of the omic­ron vari­ant of SARS-CoV­‑2 (which only appeared in Novem­ber 2021) and its human tar­get (the ACE2 lung recept­or) was revealed. This has led to new strategies to fight more effect­ively against the infec­tion of this vir­us in our lungs6. Also, know­ledge of the exact arrange­ment of the amyl­oid fibres involved in Alzheimer­’s dis­ease has made it pos­sible to design drugs that slow down the accu­mu­la­tion of these fibres in our brain7. Thus, more and more bio­lo­gic­al mod­els are being revis­ited and rap­idly improved thanks to high-res­ol­u­tion 3D struc­tures obtained with the latest advances in elec­tron micro­scopy. Tech­no­lo­gic­al bar­ri­ers are open­ing up to now observe pro­teins alone or in com­plex with oth­er part­ners to bet­ter under­stand their role in the cell. No won­der the phar­ma­ceut­ic­al industry is invest­ing heav­ily in this tech­nique to screen their new thera­peut­ic molecules more eas­ily and quickly!

The limits of the technique

An elec­tron micro­scope oper­ates in an ultra-high vacu­um (10-8 mbar) so that the elec­trons flow­ing through it gen­er­ate as little extraneous noise as pos­sible. The only way to observe a bio­lo­gic­al sample is to trans­form it into a sol­id ice cube (by vit­ri­fic­a­tion) so that the sample, once in the micro­scope, remains in sol­id form while retain­ing its ori­gin­al shape: this is what is known as cryo-EM!

Image of an elec­tron micro­scopy grid taken at low mag­ni­fic­a­tion. You can see the cop­per frame on which the thin per­for­ated car­bon mem­brane rests: this is the sup­port for any bio­lo­gic­al sample stud­ied by cryo-elec­tron micro­scopy8.

The sup­port on which the sample is depos­ited is, in gen­er­al, a per­for­ated car­bon mem­brane of about 10 nm thick­ness which rests on a cop­per frame­work form­ing tiles of about 100x100 µm. The sample will be trapped in the holes of the per­for­ated mem­brane and the most crit­ic­al step is to form a thin film in each hole. The cop­per frame­work is a stand­ard 3mm dia­met­er grid. This grid is then placed in the elec­tron microscope.

The elec­tron beam used (gen­er­ated by the elec­tron micro­scope) will pass through the sample on the grid. The images recor­ded by trans­mis­sion will provide inform­a­tion on the 3D organ­isa­tion of the atoms that the beam encoun­ters, but they also gen­er­ate a lot of noise. This is why it is neces­sary to record thou­sands of images to aver­age the inform­a­tion and obtain a good sig­nal-to-noise ratio, in order to unam­bigu­ously determ­ine the shape of the bio­lo­gic­al objects studied.

In each image, a few dozen bio­lo­gic­al objects (called particles) can be seen. The shapes observed in the images cor­res­pond to dif­fer­ent pro­jec­tions of the same 3D object. A pro­jec­tion con­tains all the struc­tur­al inform­a­tion to trace the atom­ic coordin­ates of the 3D object. The images must then be ana­lysed to match the rota­tion angles applied to the ori­gin­al 3D object, to obtain the observed pro­jec­tion in the micro­scope. By col­lect­ing a large amount of data, it is pos­sible to obtain the 3D struc­ture of a bio­lo­gic­al object on an atom­ic scale. So, research that used to take sev­er­al months now takes only a few weeks or even days.

Not every bio­lo­gic­al sample can be observed with an elec­tron micro­scope yet. At present, objects smal­ler than 20–25 kDa (about 3 nm) are very dif­fi­cult, if not impossible, to observe. But this is where the oth­er struc­tur­al approaches described at the begin­ning can fill this gap!

One of the labor­at­or­ies at École Poly­tech­nique (BIOC) is a pion­eer in its field, using the elec­tron micro­scopy approach to study, among its vari­ous research top­ics, the ribosomes of Archaea. The pre­lim­in­ary data for the work pub­lished910 were car­ried out at CIMEX (see box).

Another revolution on the way? 

Over the past dec­ade, major revolu­tions have taken place in the design of micro­scopes, in the cam­era tech­no­logy used to take images and in the soft­ware used to pro­cess these images. This dis­cip­line has been brought up to date and has rad­ic­ally changed the way research­ers approach bio­lo­gic­al problems.

The next step is to see the molecules in their cel­lu­lar con­text. Elec­tron tomo­graphy is still a tra­di­tion­al meth­od that requires a lot of know-how and is not very pop­u­lar. The pre­par­a­tion of the samples is even more crit­ic­al: it requires us to be able to cut a thin lamella of about 200 nm thick­ness out of a cell ice cube. This slide is then observed at dif­fer­ent angles in the micro­scope to cal­cu­late a 3D map of the region of interest at medi­um res­ol­u­tion. Com­puters are then able to recog­nise pro­files of molecules in this 3D map to recon­struct a mod­el of the 3D map. There are many devel­op­ments in this field and in a few dec­ades it should be pos­sible to look at a par­tic­u­lar pro­tein any­where in the cell in its cel­lu­lar con­text. The nano-uni­verse of cells will soon hold no secrets for us…

CIMEX

The Centre Inter­dis­cip­lin­aire de Micro­scopie Elec­tro­nique de l’É­cole Poly­tech­nique (CIMEX) is a plat­form hous­ing sev­er­al micro­scopes where phys­i­cists, chem­ists and bio­lo­gists can meet and use high-per­form­ance elec­tron micro­scopes. One of the micro­scopes, called Nan­o­MAX, is a world pro­to­type. It is used by phys­i­cists and chem­ists to study, among oth­er things, the growth of car­bon nan­otubes at high res­ol­u­tion and in real time. The oth­er micro­scope used more by bio­lo­gists, called Nan’eau, is ver­sat­ile and well-equipped. It allows import­ant pre­lim­in­ary data to be obtained before mov­ing on to state-of-the-art micro­scopes (avail­able at 3 nation­al ref­er­ence centres). The images then recor­ded will be of suf­fi­cient qual­ity to obtain the high-res­ol­u­tion 3D struc­ture of the object studied.

1https://​www​.nature​.com/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​/​1​7​1​964b0
2https://​www​.sci​ence​.org/​d​o​i​/​1​0​.​1​1​2​6​/​s​c​i​e​n​c​e​.​a​b​m7285
3https://​onlinelib​rary​.wiley​.com/​d​o​i​/​p​d​f​/​1​0​.​1​0​0​2​/​p​r​o​.​5​5​6​0​0​61209
4Hende­r­son, R., Unwin, P. Three-dimen­sion­al mod­el of purple mem­brane obtained by elec­tron micro­scopy. Nature 257, 28–32 (1975)
5https://​www​.emdatare​source​.org/​E​M​D​-3883
6https://​doi​.org/​1​0​.​1​0​1​6​/​j​.​c​e​l​l​.​2​0​2​2​.​0​1.001
7https://www.nature.com/articles/s41401-020‑0485‑4
8https://www.eden-instruments.com/en/in-operando-equipments/protochips-in-situ-in-operando-em-microscopy/c‑flat-grids/
9https://​www​.nature​.com/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​/​n​c​o​m​m​s​13366
10https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-020‑0780‑0

Contributors

Pierre-Damien COUREUX

Pierre-Damien Coureux

Assistant Professor in Electron Microscopy at BIOC* at École Polytechnique (IP Paris)

After a PhD in structural biology on myosin molecular motors at Institut Curie in 2004, he left for the United States to study bacterial and plant photoreceptors using several approaches including electron microscopy. He was recruited in 2008 at the Ecole Polytechnique and works mainly on the cellular machines that synthesise our proteins: the ribosomes, with those of the Archaea as a study model. He was appointed head of CIMEX in 2020 and is also involved in teaching biology at X.

*BIOC: a joint research unit CNRS, École Polytechnique - Institut Polytechnique de Paris

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate