Home / Chroniques / Depression and gut microbiota: “A medical revolution awaits!”
Human microbiome in intestine
π Health and biotech π Neuroscience

Depression and gut microbiota: “A medical revolution awaits!”

Gérard Eberl
Gérard Eberl
Director of immunology department at Institut Pasteur
Pierre-Marie Lledo
Pierre-Marie Lledo
Research Director at CNRS, Head of Department at Institut Pasteur, and member of the European Academy of Sciences

Accord­ing to your research 1 2, depres­sion is not only a brain dis­ease, but also an intest­in­al dis­order. Can you explain this?

Pierre-Mar­ie Lledo. These stud­ies are based on what we call the “holo­bi­onte” – a concept increas­ingly defen­ded in bio­logy based on the notion of mutu­al­ist­ic sym­bi­os­is. The term con­siders a liv­ing being as a “supra-organ­ism” whose parts are in per­man­ent com­mu­nic­a­tion, and which shares its body with numer­ous micro-organ­isms such as those found in the intest­ine. Accord­ing to this concept, “the whole is more than the sum of its parts,” to para­phrase Aris­totle. Gérard has writ­ten some won­der­ful art­icles, such as the one in the journ­al, PNAS, on this notion of sym­bi­os­is in the liv­ing world 3

Gérard Eberl. Even though us immun­o­lo­gists have been work­ing for more than a cen­tury on the immune sys­tem, it is only recently that we have been able to effect­ively col­lab­or­ate with col­leagues in oth­er dis­cip­lines – par­tic­u­larly neur­os­cience. We now know that you can­’t look at the immune sys­tem without look­ing at the brain or look at the brain without look­ing at the gut flora (micro­bi­ota) or the immune system.

P‑ML. Dis­rup­tion of com­mu­nic­a­tion between these three sys­tems causes dis­eases such as depres­sion, or oth­er men­tal patho­lo­gies related to prob­lems in brain devel­op­ment. This obser­va­tion will lead us to a great med­ic­al revolu­tion and a redefin­i­tion of clin­ic­al defin­i­tions in neur­o­logy and psychiatry!

Do we know if stress causes a dis­turb­ance of the micro­bi­ota or if it is rather the dis­turb­ance of the micro­bi­ota that favours the appear­ance of depress­ive symptoms?

GE. This is really close to the concept of the chick­en and the egg! It’s often like that in immun­o­logy. The micro­bi­ota changes its struc­ture because of pres­sure from the host organ­ism, either through the nervous or the immune sys­tem. As a con­sequence, the imbal­ance in micro­bi­ota induces changes in the immune and nervous sys­tems that per­petu­ate this phe­nomen­on. It is a cir­cu­lar caus­al­ity. 

In fact, it’s easi­er to under­stand how the micro­bi­ota affects the host than it is to under­stand the oppos­ite. That’s because there are many ways to change the struc­ture of the micro­bi­ota. It can be dis­rup­ted because of a change in diet, stress affect­ing peri­stalt­ic move­ment or the immune sys­tem. It must be also said that we mainly study these effects in mice, and there are many ways to explain a change in micro­bi­ota of a chron­ic­ally depressed mouse. So, the ori­gin of how this hap­pens in our mod­els has not yet been invest­ig­ated for the simple reas­on that it would take years of investigation.

As such, you have not yet spe­cific­ally stud­ied the micro­bi­ota of mice and its com­pos­i­tion in detail. You have, how­ever, trans­planted the micro­bi­ota of one mouse into that of anoth­er. What did you observe? 

GE. We trans­ferred the micro­bi­ota of a stressed mouse to a healthy mouse, which also became stressed and depressed as a res­ult. In the samples, we observed a low pres­ence of lacto­ba­cilli – a fam­ily of intest­in­al bac­teria. By cor­rect­ing this decrease in lacto­ba­cilli by treat­ing the mice with a par­tic­u­lar strain of lacto­ba­cilli (reu­teri), we were able to restore a non-depressed phenotype. 

P‑ML. The chron­ic stress that causes the anim­al to become depressed is thus accom­pan­ied by an imbal­ance, albeit minor, in the com­pos­i­tion of the micro­bi­ota. While we have not estab­lished the factors that cause this dys­bi­os­is [imbal­ance of the micro­bi­ota], we have at least demon­strated that sup­ple­ment­ing the diet with lacto­ba­cilli is suf­fi­cient to restore the ini­tial bal­ance of the intest­in­al micro­bi­ota – res­ult­ing in an anti-depress­ant effect. 

GE. The inter­ac­tion between the micro­bi­ota and the brain is medi­ated in this case by the so-called “endocan­nabin­oid” sys­tem. The lack of lacto­ba­cilli in “depressed” mice leads to a decrease in arachidon­ic acid, the pre­curs­or of endocan­nabin­oids, cir­cu­lat­ing in their bod­ies. This decrease in turn has effects on the hip­po­cam­pus, an area of the brain involved in depres­sion. 

We have demon­strated that sup­ple­ment­ing the diet with lacto­ba­cilli is suf­fi­cient to restore the ini­tial bal­ance of the intest­in­al micro­bi­ota – res­ult­ing in an anti-depress­ant effect.

Can we adapt your obser­va­tions to humans?

P‑ML. For us, it’s not a big leap. We hope to have put our fin­ger on a fun­da­ment­al nod­ule between the micro­bi­ota and its action on the hip­po­cam­pus through endocan­nabin­oids. These three ele­ments are also present in humans. Although, we must wait for clin­ic­al stud­ies to study the anti­de­press­ant role of lacto­ba­cilli and oth­er bac­teri­al spe­cies found in the intestines.

Will we treat depres­sion with faecal transplants?

P‑ML. Faecal trans­plants are com­plex because the humans, as a spe­cies, carry a great diversity of micro­bi­ota. Bring­ing in large num­bers of oth­er spe­cies of bac­teria means tak­ing the risk of upset­ting the bal­ance. On the oth­er hand, we can assume that a new gen­er­a­tion of pro­bi­ot­ics using syn­thet­ic bac­teria might not affect the balance.

GE. Rather than faecal trans­plants, it is prefer­able to add bac­teria to the exist­ing micro­bi­ota – either with clas­sic­al pro­bi­ot­ics, some of which were dis­covered 100 years ago at the Pas­teur Insti­tute in par­tic­u­lar, or with new gen­er­a­tion solu­tions. By identi­fy­ing bac­teria and the genes that con­trib­ute to these bio­lo­gic­al pro­cesses, it is pos­sible to gen­er­ate genet­ic­ally mod­i­fied syn­thet­ic bacteria. 

To do so we could com­bine the genes of dif­fer­ent bac­teria to pro­duce exactly what is needed. This would be a solu­tion to go bey­ond clas­sic­al pro­bi­ot­ics, which have a sig­ni­fic­ant but lim­ited effect. Even if there is pub­lic or offi­cial res­ist­ance to syn­thet­ic or recom­bin­ant bac­teria, this approach would be much safer than faecal transfers.

How can these dis­cov­er­ies be applied in prac­tice to treat patients?

P‑ML. Our work should encour­age the clin­ic­al world to take a more hol­ist­ic view of depres­sion. Under the gen­er­ic term “depres­sion”, there are prob­ably sev­er­al patho­lo­gic­al forms of mood dis­orders, which have little to do with each oth­er on a bio­lo­gic­al level. For some, stand­ard anti­de­press­ants will suf­fice, but not for oth­ers. Remem­ber that 30% of patients are res­ist­ant to all drug treatments!

Our approach may help tar­get a sub­cat­egory of depressed indi­vidu­als whose “hip­po­can­nabin­oid” recept­ors are not suf­fi­ciently activ­ated because of the lack of ant­ag­on­ists nat­ur­ally pro­duced by gut bac­teria. Psy­chi­at­rists and bio­lo­gists should start look­ing for indic­at­ors of these defi­cient meta­bol­ic path­ways. Cur­rently, expert centres are per­form­ing these tests, at least for research pur­poses, by build­ing up cohorts of patients with blood tests, but this should be done more systematically.

GE. There is a lot of talk about psycho­so­mat­ic dis­eases, char­ac­ter­ised by phys­ic­al symp­toms of men­tal states. But the reverse com­pon­ent, the “soma­to­psych­ic”, has not yet entered the vocab­u­lary. Is it the mind that makes the body sick, or is it the body that harms the mind? This is part of the holo­bi­onte concept. The brain is immersed in the envir­on­ment and the envir­on­ment of the body is con­trolled, reg­u­lated by the brain. It is a feed­back loop! It is there­fore neces­sary to also con­sider the soma in order to heal the mind. 

Interview by Agnès Vernet 
1E. Siopi et al. Changes in Gut Micro­bi­ota by Chron­ic Stress Impair the Effic­acy of Fluoxet­ine. Cell Rep. 2020 Mar 17;30(11):3682–3690.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.02.099.
2G. Che­va­lier et al. Effect of gut micro­bi­ota on depress­ive-like beha­vi­ors in mice is medi­ated by the endocan­nabin­oid sys­tem. Nat Com­mun. 2020 Dec 11;11(1):6363.doi: 10.1038/s41467-020–19931‑2.
3Mar­garet McFall-Ngai et al. Anim­als in a bac­teri­al world. PNAS. 2013, 110 (9) doi:10.1073/pnas.1218525110

Contributors

Gérard Eberl

Gérard Eberl

Director of immunology department at Institut Pasteur

Gérard Eberl obtained his Ph.D. at the University of Lausanne before completing a first postdoc at the Ludwig Institute on Cancer Research. A second position in New York led him to characterise the role of the nuclear hormone receptor RORt in innate lymphoid cells (ILC). In 2005, Gérard was recruited by the Institut Pasteur in Paris to lead the Lymphoid Tissue Development Unit, which became the Microenvironment & Immunity Unit in 2015. From 2015 to 2019, Gérard served as Chairman of the Department of Immunology at the Institut Pasteur.

Pierre-Marie Lledo

Pierre-Marie Lledo

Research Director at CNRS, Head of Department at Institut Pasteur, and member of the European Academy of Sciences

Pierre-Marie Lledo’s research focuses on the adaptation and regeneration of neurons in the brain, and their interactions with the immune system. He is Research director at the CNRS, head of the Genes and Cognition laboratory, and director of the Perception and Memory unit and of Plasticity and Development of the Nervous System at the Pasteur Institute.

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate