Home / Chroniques / Earthquakes: a force of nature that can be tamed?
Cracked road from volcano activity in Volcano national park, Hawaii
π Planet

Earthquakes : a force of nature that can be tamed ?

Jean François Semblat
Jean-François Semblat
Professor at at ENSTA Paris, Head of mechanics and energy department at IP Paris

Ear­th­quakes are natu­ral catas­trophes that hap­pen due to a sud­den rup­ture in the geo­lo­gi­cal layers of the Earth’s crust. Each year, there is at least one ear­th­quake, which pro­duces a magni­tude over 8 [Rich­ter scale, the ener­gy level] somew­here in the world, and a fur­ther 130 of a magni­tude bet­ween 6 and 7. On ave­rage, eve­ry minute there are two “mini” ear­th­quakes of a magni­tude of 2 or more. 

Seis­mic events like these hap­pen due to move­ment of the tec­to­nic plates ; these outer layers of our pla­net gra­dual­ly move, some­times pushing against one ano­ther. Even though this move­ment is rela­ti­ve­ly slow, the increa­sing force of the plates pushing against one ano­ther results in a huge amount of ener­gy being sto­red where they meet. Ener­gy that pro­gres­si­ve­ly builds up over the course of months or years. 

Even­tual­ly the force becomes too great, and the two plates skid past one ano­ther relea­sing an immense burst of ener­gy. That gene­rates seis­mic waves, the force of can be felt in the sha­king we expe­rience during an ear­th­quake, resul­ting in hea­vy damage to buil­dings, bridges and life­lines (e.g. water, gas). As such, sub­sequent damage can be colos­sal. The large 2011 Toho­ku ear­th­quake in Japan, for example, cost the World bank ~$235bn.

Artificial earthquakes

Natu­ral ear­th­quakes aside, today there are a num­ber of man-made ear­th­quakes, too. Occur­ring due to various human acti­vi­ties, these seis­mic events take the form of weak sha­king gene­ra­ted by trans­port sys­tems such as hea­vy trucks, or indus­trial faci­li­ties using tur­bines. Whil­st these weak shakes tend not to be too trou­ble­some, there are other stron­ger arti­fi­cial quakes. Strong sha­king, for example, can be felt in neigh­bou­rhoods that sur­round geo­ther­mal plants (such as those in Stras­bourg or Basel), mining ope­ra­tions or areas where hydrau­lic frac­tu­ring is per­for­med. Such effects are cal­led “anthro­pic seis­mi­ci­ty” since they are due to human activities.

Taking the example of hydrau­lic frac­tu­ring. It is a pro­cess which is used to obtain oil and gas trap­ped inside solid bedrock, by pum­ping pres­su­ri­sed liquid under­ground. The result is a series of cracks being crea­ted under­ground, relea­sing the hydro­car­bons from pockets that would other­wise have remain trap­ped for mil­len­nia. As such, this tech­nique can induce signi­fi­cant sha­king or even acti­vate pre-exis­ting natu­ral fault lines bet­ween the geo­lo­gi­cal layers. Even though hydrau­lic frac­tu­ring is an impor­tant method of extrac­ting oil, indus­trial acti­vi­ties are often delayed or even for­bid­den because of the risks of quakes. 

Lubri­ca­ting fluids could be injec­ted into the bedrock so that the geo­lo­gi­cal struc­tures ‘slide’ smooth­ly over each other.

Controlling artificial quakes

Since the annoyances or damages due to arti­fi­cial quakes can prove to be signi­fi­cant, it is man­da­to­ry to balance the risk with the eco­no­mic issues. Hence, seve­ral ave­nues are under stu­dy to find an appro­priate method of pre­ven­tion. To reduce arti­fi­cial quakes, research has shown that it may be pos­sible to inject lubri­can­ting fluids into the bedrock so that the geo­lo­gi­cal struc­tures gent­ly “slide” against one ano­ther ; relea­sing the ener­gy in a gra­dual rather than bru­tal way. 

The CoQuake pro­ject, fun­ded by the Euro­pean com­mis­sion, aims at control­ling arti­fi­cial quakes in such a way1. As such, ongoing research is being conduc­ted in the fra­me­work of this pro­ject bet­ween Ecole Cen­trale de Nantes (Prof. Ste­fa­nou) and Ins­ti­tut Poly­tech­nique de Paris (POEMS, Dr Chaillat, and IMSIA Labs at ENSTA Paris). They com­bine lab expe­ri­ments, com­plex mecha­ni­cal and seis­mo­lo­gi­cal models as well as advan­ced simu­la­tion methods. 

We have a PhD student (L. Bagur) who is stu­dying the com­plex mecha­ni­cal pro­cesses that occur in man-made quakes using com­pu­ter models. Using a soft­ware known as COFFEE2, the team can model the effec­ti­ve­ness of control­ling quakes by injec­ting dif­ferent fluids, all the while taking into account the extre­me­ly com­plex 3D layout of the geo­lo­gi­cal layers. The chal­lenge is to unders­tand the dif­ferent sli­ding effects of fluid pres­sures – simi­lar to what hap­pens with wind­screen wipers slip­ping or squea­king depen­ding on how much rain there is !

Of course, beyond the scien­ti­fic inter­est in the topic, there are huge eco­no­mic and envi­ron­men­tal bene­fits if we are able to reduce seis­mic pro­blems asso­cia­ted with hydrau­lic fracturing. 

Ultimate dream : control natural quakes

For natu­ral quakes, we alrea­dy know the cru­cial role of fluids in the trig­ge­ring of fault slips. It has been exten­si­ve­ly stu­died in the Corinth gulf – one of the most seis­mic areas in Europe. We could thus ima­gine being able to adjust the fluid pres­sure at stra­te­gic posi­tions to control sta­bi­li­ty of fault lines.

This pos­si­bi­li­ty remains a very com­plex pro­blem on such a large scale. So, the idea is exci­ting but it will pro­ba­bly need huge faci­li­ties to reach an effi­cient pro­cess. Such ideas are lin­ked to on-going research conduc­ted in the USA by Prof Avouac at Cal­tech3. He stu­died the so-cal­led slip defi­cit along active fault lines in order to pre­dict the trig­ge­ring of large quakes. The idea is to quan­ti­fy the num­ber of ear­th­quakes that should have occur­red over a given per­iod of time in order to assess the pro­ba­bi­li­ty of a large ear­th­quake occur­ring in the future in rela­tion to the build-up of forces in the tec­to­nic plates.

In fact, the ener­gy sto­rage pro­cess around large faults may be slow. It may take decades, so no news may often be bad news in the case of ear­th­quakes. But, one day, we may even­tual­ly be able to mas­ter and control large earthquakes !

1https://​coquake​.eu
2https://​uma​.ens​ta​-paris​.fr
3Prof Avouac is a recent invi­ted resear­cher at Ins­ti­tut Poly­tech­nique de Paris : https://​www​.poly​tech​nique​.edu/​f​r​/​c​o​n​t​e​n​t​/​d​e​s​-​s​e​i​s​m​e​s​-​a​u​-​r​a​l​e​n​t​i​-​s​o​u​s​-​l​e​s​-​c​a​s​cades

Contributors

Jean François Semblat

Jean-François Semblat

Professor at at ENSTA Paris, Head of mechanics and energy department at IP Paris

Jean-François Semblat’s research focuses on the propagation of seismic waves in geological layers during major earthquakes. Using numerical simulation methods, he studies their amplification, attenuation, liquefaction, and dynamic soil-structure interaction. He is a member of the scientific council of the French association for earthquake engineering, a professor at ENSTA-Paris, and the head of the Mechanics and Energy department at the Institut Polytechnique in Paris.

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate