Home / Chroniques / Origami and kirigami in the service of science
Colorful paper origami close up detail
π Science and technology

Origami and kirigami in the service of science

Sophie Ramananarivo
Sophie Ramananarivo
Researcher at LadHyX* (IP Paris)
Key takeaways
  • Origami, the art of folding, and kirigami, the art of cutting, have techniques for making things that can be useful in certain scientific fields.
  • Examples of these techniques can be found in nature, such as the leaf of a tree or the wings of an insect.
  • These techniques can be used to make an object more flexible or to change its structure.
  • In this way, objects lose strength but are more easily adapted to different environments.
  • The question remains as to how to control the deformation of the flexible object so that it is fully effective.

Have you ever tried to make an A4 sheet of paper stand up? Flex­ible as it is, no mat­ter how hard you try, it will keep col­lapsing in on itself. But if you fold the same sheet length­wise, it gains a new prop­erty: more rigid, this time it stands on the table! How­ever, the mater­i­al of the sheet does not change, only a dif­fer­ent aspect of its struc­ture has been added. How can this change in prop­er­ties be explained?

This phe­nomen­on can be observed in nature, in vari­ous forms – such as the leaf of a tree, which has a spe­cif­ic fold­ing for its unfold­ing out of the bud and which rein­forces, at the same time, its struc­ture. Ori­gami, the art of fold­ing, and kiri­gami, the art of cut­ting, work in a sim­il­ar way. Soph­ie Raman­anarivo, a research­er at the Hydro­dynam­ics Labor­at­ory (Lad­HyX*1), is cur­rently work­ing on these arts and their con­tri­bu­tion to science.

From life to robotics 

One of the main advant­ages of ori­gami and kiri­gami is it’s the flex­ib­il­ity they bring to the mod­i­fied object. What is more, this flex­ib­il­ity becomes con­trol­lable. A flex­ible object can, through this char­ac­ter­ist­ic, acquire new prop­er­ties. “One of my pre­vi­ous pro­jects con­sisted of observing and under­stand­ing the use­ful­ness of the flex­ib­il­ity of the wings of cer­tain insects,” explains Soph­ie Raman­anarivo. “In fact, this char­ac­ter­ist­ic was a pass­ive way of lim­it­ing the effort of flap­ping these wings for bet­ter per­form­ance2.” Anoth­er study looked at the folds that made up the wings of cer­tain insects3. Instead of hav­ing muscles that would allow a stronger flap­ping action, the folds struc­tur­ing their wings give a great­er amp­litude to the flap­ping action, while facil­it­at­ing their deploy­ment. “It would be inter­est­ing to observe the role of these folds in flight per­form­ance,” admits the research­er. “This is some­thing I would like to study in the future.”

In this phe­nomen­on, it is not the mater­i­al of the wing that gives it this prop­erty, but the folds that it is com­posed of. This struc­ture can be repro­duced on a sheet of paper, using ori­gami. “Ori­gami and kiri­gami are used as metama­ter­i­als,” she explains. “The prop­er­ties of the object do not come from its mater­i­al, but from the struc­ture we give it.”

These tech­niques soon became of interest to the field of ‘soft robot­ics’45. “Pre­vi­ously, in robot­ics, we ten­ded to favour rigid com­pon­ents,” explains the research­er, “so that each of the robot’s parts that had to move in rela­tion to each oth­er was robust. But there is a real bene­fit in mak­ing com­pon­ents that are more flex­ible: this field of research makes it pos­sible.” Like an octopus tentacle, which is much more flex­ible than the arm of a tra­di­tion­al robot and has great­er free­dom of move­ment. How­ever, the dis­ad­vant­age of a weak tentacle, which pre­vents it from car­ry­ing heavy loads, must be taken into account. 

A low-cost object 

The tech­niques spe­cif­ic to these Japan­ese arts are sub­jects of research in full expan­sion, “espe­cially as it is a ‘low-cost’ way of mak­ing mater­i­als with very impress­ive prop­er­ties”, insists Soph­ie Raman­anarivo. The aim is there­fore to make an object that can ful­fil a func­tion ‘pass­ively’. A good example of this type of pass­ive func­tion is a valve that can open accord­ing to the intens­ity of the water flow it encounters. 

This valve is designed using ori­gami fold­ing tech­niques. These folds give the valve more flex­ib­il­ity: if the flow of water reaches a cer­tain speed – itself set accord­ing to our require­ments – it will open to allow the flow to take place without the need to oper­ate it remotely. The pro­cess is there­fore pass­ive. “Being able to per­form a func­tion pass­ively, with a flex­ible object, lim­its the pro­cesses that would have to be put in place if the func­tion in ques­tion were act­ive,” says the research­er. There is no need to install an oper­at­or to meas­ure the flow rate and finally activ­ate the valve at the right moment.

A pro­to­type of the valve with pass­ive prop­er­ties6, research to optim­ise it is still ongoing.

A sig­ni­fic­ant advant­age is that a flex­ible object tends to adapt eas­ily to its envir­on­ment, wheth­er it is stable or sub­ject to chan­ging con­di­tions. “It’s like the fable of the Oak and the Reed, the lat­ter being flex­ible enough to cope with the wind,” she says. “This phe­nomen­on can also be observed with sea­weed, which can fol­low the sea cur­rent without being uprooted. But to design such an object, you need to be able to con­trol how it will deform. Ori­gami and kiri­gami allow you to do just that: con­trol the deform­a­tion in a fairly com­plex way,” con­cludes Soph­ie Raman­anarivo. “That is why this tech­nique is of such great research interest.”

A myriad of applications

These Japan­ese arts allow the cre­ation of flex­ible objects at a lower cost, more res­ist­ant depend­ing on the con­di­tions of use, and whose pass­ive func­tion­ing could almost earn them the qual­i­fic­a­tion of “intel­li­gent objects”. Thanks to all these advant­ages, ori­gami and kiri­gami have many applic­a­tions in many fields. 

“These Japan­ese arts could almost earn flex­ible objects the title of intel­li­gent objects.”

In fact, this type of tech­nique is already being used in every­day life, for example in a deliv­ery box. It con­sists of three lay­ers, one of which is made of cor­rug­ated card­board – in the shape of a wave­let. This is an ori­gami tech­nique to absorb shocks dur­ing trans­port. The same goes for crepe bob­bins, also made of card­board, which use the kiri­gami tech­nique to pro­tect what they surround.

These assets can also enable tech­no­lo­gic­al innov­a­tions. For example, they allow the sol­ar pan­els of a satel­lite7 to unfold and ori­ent­ate them­selves accord­ing to the time of day, giv­ing it an ideal pos­i­tion in rela­tion to the sun at all times. Once the con­trol of the object’s deform­a­tion was acquired, research­ers were also able to make a kind of shield to pro­tect a drone: the rotari­gami8.   

Pablo Andres
1] *Lad­HyX : une unité mixte de recher­che CNRS, École poly­tech­nique – Insti­tut Poly­tech­nique de Par­is.
2Raman­anarivo, S., Godoy-Diana, R., & Thiria, B. (2011). Rather than res­on­ance, flap­ping wing fly­ers may play on aero­dy­nam­ics to improve per­form­ance. Pro­ceed­ings of the Nation­al Academy of Sci­ences108(15), 5964–5969.
3Haas F, Woot­ton RJ. 1996 Two basic mech­an­isms in insect wing fold­ing. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 263, 1651–1658.
4Poly­geri­nos, P., Cor­rell, N., Mor­in, S. A., Mosade­gh, B., Onal, C. D., Petersen, K., … & Shep­herd, R. F. (2017). Soft robot­ics: Review of fluid-driven intrins­ic­ally soft devices; man­u­fac­tur­ing, sens­ing, con­trol, and applic­a­tions in human-robot inter­ac­tion. Advanced Engin­eer­ing Mater­i­als19(12), 1700016.
5Lida, F., & Las­chi, C. (2011). Soft robot­ics: Chal­lenges and per­spect­ives. Pro­cedia Com­puter Sci­ence7, 99–102.
6Mar­z­in Tom, de Lan­gre Emmanuel and Raman­anarivo Soph­ie. 2022 Shape recon­fig­ur­a­tion through ori­gami fold­ing sets an upper lim­it on drag. Proc. R. Soc. A. 478: 20 220 592 http://​doi​.org/​1​0​.​1​0​9​8​/​r​s​p​a​.​2​0​2​2​.0592
7S. A. Zir­bel, R. J. Lang, M. W. Thom­son, D. A. Sigel, P. E. Walke­mey­er, B. P. Trease, S. P. Magleby, L. L. How­ell, J. Mech. Des. 2013, 135, 11.
8Sareh, P. et al. (2018) ‘Rot­ori­gami: A rotary ori­gami pro­tect­ive sys­tem for robot­ic rotor­craft’, Sci­ence Robot­ics, 3(22), p. eaah5228. Avail­able at: https://​doi​.org/​1​0​.​1​1​2​6​/​s​c​i​r​o​b​o​t​i​c​s​.​a​a​h5228.

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate