2_aiMaladies
π Health and biotech π Science and technology
Digital innovations for better health

Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s: “tommorrow, AI will detect disease”

with Agnès Vernet, Science journalist
On April 27th, 2022 |
5min reading time
Mounim El Yacoubi
Mounîm A. El Yacoubi
Professor at Télécom SudParis (IP Paris)
Key takeaways
  • AI can help go beyond current tests to provide the medical community with solutions that  are less expensive, less invasive and help refine diagnoses.
  • For Parkinson's disease, a European research project is being conducted by researchers  in collaboration with the Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière.
  • The aim is to be able to detect abnormalities typical of the disease using only a patient's  voice and facial expressions.
  • For Alzheimer's disease, the data could make it possible to follow up on how writing,  walking and voice changes over several months, things that are difficult for a doctor to follow objectively.
  • Health data could one day therefore be collected via watches, fridges, computers in order  to monitor the evolution of risky behaviour and habits.

AI and machine learn­ing are already used today to help dia­gnose patients. How can they be useful?

Moun­im El Yacoubi. First of all, it must be stressed that dia­gnos­is is not just a mat­ter of sort­ing out patients. There is no clear line between that which is “nor­mal” and that which is “patho­lo­gic­al”. This is why doc­tors remain in charge of their dia­gnoses, and why machine learn­ing solu­tions only exist as aids inten­ded not to replace them but to help them pri­or­it­ise patients.

Hence, today, machine learn­ing has a con­tri­bu­tion to make in med­ic­al dia­gnoses, par­tic­u­larly con­cern­ing the detec­tion of anom­alies in MRIs. This type of meth­od is based on super­vised learn­ing using mil­lions of images, in which the sys­tems are able to detect anom­alies, with very high clas­si­fic­a­tion rates – some­times in even finer detail than those of doctors.

So, you are say­ing that AI can be used to go bey­ond cur­rent health testing?

Yes, it can. Tra­di­tion­al dia­gnost­ic meth­ods, which rely on blood tests, med­ic­al ima­ging or the meas­ure­ment of oth­er bio­lo­gic­al para­met­ers, try to identi­fy an anom­aly or the char­ac­ter­ist­ic symp­toms of a patho­logy. They work fairly well but are not per­fect because they are often invas­ive and costly in terms of equip­ment and per­son­nel. Patients also have to come to the hos­pit­al or med­ic­al labor­at­ory. For all these reas­ons, dia­gnost­ic tools based on machine learn­ing, on data from inex­pens­ive and non-invas­ive sensors, are of interest to the med­ic­al community.

You are work­ing on tech­niques using data that goes bey­ond tra­di­tion­al med­ic­al testing?

We work on so-called “eco­lo­gic­al data”, such as hand­writ­ing, gait or voice. For Par­kin­son’s dis­ease, we are con­duct­ing a European research pro­ject in col­lab­or­a­tion with the Insti­tut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épin­ière in France. The aim is to be able to detect abnor­mal­it­ies in a patient’s voice and facial expres­sions – that are char­ac­ter­ist­ics of the dis­ease – dur­ing a simple video call.

People suf­fer­ing from this neuro­de­gen­er­at­ive dis­order gen­er­ally show hypo­mim­ia, i.e., a reduc­tion in the amp­litude of express­ive move­ments, or voice alter­a­tions. We are devel­op­ing a machine learn­ing meth­od to auto­mat­ic­ally detect these sig­nals, and we aim to com­pare these res­ults with MRI data or oth­er clin­ic­al indic­at­ors. We hope that our approach can help to bet­ter char­ac­ter­ise patients and strat­i­fy the dis­ease; mean­ing that we will identi­fy cri­ter­ia for detect­ing groups of Parkinson’s patients with dif­fer­ent beha­viours, who could there­fore be treated by doc­tors with dif­fer­ent treat­ments and therapies.

With a tool like this, a first dia­gnost­ic step could be made without even need­ing to bring the patient into the med­ic­al centre!

Will they be able to use data that is cur­rently imper­cept­ible to doctors?

In the­ory, the doc­tor could detect these signs, but in prac­tice it is very com­plic­ated, because you would have to com­pare how facial expres­sions evolved over sev­er­al months. We developed a sim­il­ar approach for Alzheimer’s dis­ease, in col­lab­or­a­tion with the Broca Hos­pit­al in Par­is. The aim was to identi­fy the deteri­or­a­tion in hand­writ­ing, voice and walk­ing attrib­ut­able to the dis­ease. For this work on neuro­de­gen­er­at­ive dis­eases, the chal­lenge is to recon­cile spe­cificity and sens­it­iv­ity. We want to be able to identi­fy patients with early forms without con­fus­ing them with oth­er neur­o­lo­gic­al dis­orders, such as mild cog­nit­ive impair­ment or oth­er patho­lo­gies. It’s very tricky.

Can con­nec­ted devices help you deploy these approaches?

For type‑2 dia­betes, we use con­nec­ted blood gluc­ose sensors. They allow us to read blood gluc­ose levels con­tinu­ously; we don’t need to ask patients to prick them­selves and col­lect meas­ure­ments 24-hours a day. We com­bine this data with inform­a­tion on meals and insulin intake, which the patient can give us via a dia­betes track­ing applic­a­tion on a smart­phone, and their phys­ic­al activ­ity, which is recor­ded via a con­nec­ted brace­let. By com­bin­ing this inform­a­tion, we can pre­dict the blood sug­ar level.

The aim was to identi­fy hand­writ­ing, voice and walk­ing impair­ments caused by the disease

This is a real chal­lenge because each per­son has his or her own meta­bol­ism, his or her own genet­ics… We have there­fore cre­ated per­son­al­ised mod­els based on ‘sequen­tial deep learn­ing’ mod­els. This work was the sub­ject of a thes­is by Maxime de Bois, which I co-dir­ec­ted with Mehdi Ammi from the Uni­ver­sity of Par­is-Saclay. Maxime developed his tech­nique on a syn­thet­ic patient base, val­id­ated by the FDA, the Amer­ic­an reg­u­lat­ory author­ity. He then tested it on 6 patients in col­lab­or­a­tion with the Reves­diab network.

Did you encounter any difficulties?

Yes, sev­er­al, but we were able to resolve them. To over­come the lack of data, we use a trans­fer learn­ing meth­od, which allows us to pre-train the mod­el from oth­er patients, ensur­ing that it gen­er­ates the most gen­er­al para­met­ers pos­sible, and there­fore the most adapt­able to a new patient. To improve the accept­ab­il­ity of the sys­tem to doc­tors, we have taken into account the dif­fer­ences in pre­dic­tions in our choice of metrics.

To explain how our mod­el works, we integ­rated lay­ers into our deep neur­al net­work (the learn­ing meth­od) to estim­ate the weight of each vari­able over time. For each pre­dic­tion, we are thus able to indic­ate, at each point in time, which vari­able (blood sug­ar, food or insulin) was decis­ive. This is also a very inter­est­ing aspect because the doc­tors them­selves do not know which para­met­er is great­er at a giv­en moment.

Is this your only pro­ject with con­nec­ted objects?

No, we also have a pro­ject to improve the dia­gnos­is of car­di­ac arrhythmia using a con­nec­ted brace­let that meas­ures arter­i­al stiff­ness. Here too, we will com­pare our res­ults with those obtained with electrocardiograms.

Do you think that, in the future, our con­nec­ted fridge will be able to alert us to a risk of depress­ive behaviour?

It is indeed a good object to spot changes in habits… One can ima­gine that these data could be cor­rel­ated with those of a smart­phone or with the nature and activ­it­ies on the web­sites vis­ited. This will raise a major data pro­tec­tion issue. Will we allow our doc­tor to con­sult the ana­lyses from our fridge? Will our search engine or social net­works warn us if our beha­viour changes in a dan­ger­ous way? One ima­gines that people with chron­ic patho­lo­gies and who exper­i­ence phase changes, such as dia­bet­ics or suf­fer­ers of bipolar dis­order, would be more likely to give informed con­sent to this type of approach.

For fur­ther information:

  • DIGIPD : Val­id­at­ing DIGIt­al bio­mark­ers for bet­ter per­son­al­ized treat­ment of Parkinson’s Dis­ease, https://​www​.erapermed​.eu/​w​p​-​c​o​n​t​e​n​t​/​u​p​l​o​a​d​s​/​2​0​2​1​/​0​1​/​N​e​w​s​l​e​t​t​e​r​-​E​R​A​-​P​e​r​M​e​d​_​f​i​n​a​l.pdf, 2021.
  • Maxime De Bois, Moun­im A. El-Yacoubi, Mehdi Ammi, “Adversari­al multi-source trans­fer learn­ing in health­care: Applic­a­tion to gluc­ose pre­dic­tion for dia­bet­ic people,” Com­puter Meth­ods Pro­grams Bio­medi­cine, 199: 105874 (2021).
  • Maxime De Bois, Moun­im A. El-Yacoubi, Mehdi Ammi, “Enhan­cing the Inter­pretab­il­ity of Deep Mod­els in Heath­care Through Atten­tion: Applic­a­tion to Gluc­ose Fore­cast­ing for Dia­bet­ic People,” Inter­na­tion­al Journ­al of Pat­tern Recog­ni­tion and Arti­fi­cial Intel­li­gence, to appear, 2021.
  • Moun­îm A. El-Yacoubi, Sonia Gar­cia-Salicetti, Chris­ti­an Kahindo, Anne-Soph­ie Rigaud, and Vic­tor­ia Cristan­cho-Lacroix, « From aging to early-stage Alzheimer­’s: Uncov­er­ing hand­writ­ing mul­timod­al beha­vi­ors by semi-super­vised learn­ing and sequen­tial rep­res­ent­a­tion learn­ing, » Pat­tern Recog­ni­tion, Vol. 86, pp. 112–133, 2/2019.
  • Saeideh Mirz­a­ei, Moun­im El Yacoubi, Sonia Gar­cia-Salicetti, Jerome Boudy, C Kahindo, V Cristan­cho-Lacroix, Hélène Ker­her­vé, A‑S Rigaud, “Two-stage fea­ture selec­tion of voice para­met­ers for early Alzheimer­’s dis­ease pre­dic­tion,” IRBM, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 430–435, 2018.

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate