3_radiotherapie
π Health and biotech
Tumours: “better understanding has improved treatments”

Advances in physics: “new radiotherapies are on the horizon”

with Alessandro Flacco, Associate professor at ENSTA Paris (IP Paris)
On October 21st, 2021 |
3min reading time
Alessandro Flacco
Alessandro Flacco
Associate professor at ENSTA Paris (IP Paris)
Key takeaways
  • Radiotherapy is used to destroy cancer cells as precisely as possible, without affecting the surrounding healthy cells.
  • Since the 1990s, doctors have been using proton therapies, and more recently, the use of electron beams in cancer treatment has been studied.
  • Recent findings showed that the toxicity of radiation is related to the duration of exposure; known as the ‘flash effect’, a short burst of radiation.
  • The shorter the time, the less healthy cells are affected thanks to less burning and less fibrosis.
  • This discovery has prompted scientists to re-explore sources of particles such as pulsed lasers that provide fast and very locally intense radiation – or by injecting nanoparticles.

Con­trary to what we may think, it is not only bio­lo­gic­al sci­ence research that con­trib­utes to advances in can­cer ther­apy. Phys­ics, and in par­tic­u­lar particle sci­ence, has also con­trib­uted to import­ant thera­peut­ic advances; par­tic­u­larly involved in both improve­ments in effect­ive­ness and reduc­tions in side effects of radio­ther­apy, which accounts for more than half of all treatments. 

Eliminating tumours

To under­stand this pro­gress, we must first under­stand the prin­ciple of radio­ther­apy; an approach that con­sists of elim­in­at­ing can­cer cells using radi­ation. This radi­ation des­troys the can­cer cells as pre­cisely as pos­sible, without affect­ing the sur­round­ing healthy cells. To achieve this, doc­tors rely on radi­ation-induced tox­icity, i.e. the lower res­ist­ance of can­cer cells to the effects of radi­ation com­pared to nor­mal cells. This prop­erty ensures the thera­peut­ic mar­gin, the dif­fer­ence between an effect­ive dose* and a tox­ic dose. The lat­ter is also the res­ult of topo­lo­gic­al advances and bet­ter beam focus­ing. The com­bin­a­tion of these two phe­nom­ena, radi­ation-induced tox­icity and topo­logy, pro­tects the healthy tis­sue around the tumour.

Ion­ising rays depos­it energy deep in the tis­sue. They act at dif­fer­ent levels: atom­ic, molecu­lar, chem­ic­al, bio­lo­gic­al, and physiolo­gic­al. At the atom­ic level, radi­ation inter­acts with the chem­ic­al com­pon­ents con­tained with­in cells. Their ion­ising actions pro­duce react­ive spe­cies, such as free rad­ic­als, which can also des­troy DNA and drive the cell to death. They also act dir­ectly at the molecu­lar level, pro­du­cing breaks in the DNA molecules. If there is enough dam­age, it over­whelms the cell’s self-repair pro­cesses. So, when the cell attempts to divide, as can­cer cells do, it fails to com­plete its divi­sion and dies. This amount of dam­age attacks the struc­ture of the tumour.

Sev­er­al types of particles can be used: X‑rays (photons) are the most com­mon. Since the 1990s, doc­tors have been using pro­ton ther­apies, and more recently, the use of elec­tron beams in can­cer treat­ment has been studied.

Finding the right dose

The mech­an­isms of how radio­ther­apy works are known, and its bio­lo­gic­al con­trol seemed clear. And it was thought that the bio­lo­gic­al effect was induced by the dose of radi­ation admin­istered, a dose-response effect typ­ic­al of bio­logy. But recently this cer­tainty has been over­turned as it was dis­covered that the time pro­file of the dose alters the tox­icity of the radi­ation1. This is known as the ‘flash effect’, which con­sists of deliv­er­ing the dose of radi­ation in an extremely short time – over a few mil­li­seconds instead of sev­er­al minutes.

The short­er the time, the lower the sens­it­iv­ity of healthy cells to the radi­ation, while that of can­cer cells remains the same. The Flash effect thus increases the thera­peut­ic mar­gin. In prac­tice, this reduces the undesir­able effects of radio­ther­apy by caus­ing less burn­ing and pro­du­cing less fibrosis – abnor­mal scar­ring of healthy tis­sue that can hinder the func­tion­ing of an organ, such as the liv­er or lungs when they are close to the irra­di­ated area.

This effect is increas­ingly doc­u­mented by clin­ic­al research, but the pre­cise explan­a­tion is still miss­ing, open­ing up a new field of research. 

New lasers

This dis­cov­ery has promp­ted sci­ent­ists to re-explore sources of particles. In this respect, my team and I are study­ing the value of laser radi­ation. Unlike con­ven­tion­al sys­tems, lasers are pulsed rather than con­tinu­ous sources of particles. Laser sources have a dif­fer­ent time pro­file to con­ven­tion­al or even Flash sources. The radi­ation gen­er­ated is both very fast and very loc­ally intense. We are cur­rently try­ing to study its bio­lo­gic­al effect and it does not seem to be com­par­able to the Flash effect.

On cells in cul­ture, we have observed a bio­lo­gic­al effect, a tox­icity of can­cer cells which seems inter­est­ing2. We are cur­rently study­ing the feas­ib­il­ity of car­ry­ing out in vivo tests to bet­ter con­firm this effect. Oth­er pro­gress is linked to advances in phys­ics. This is the case with nan­o­particles, which aim to con­cen­trate irra­di­ation loc­ally. The idea is to inject these nan­o­particles into the tumour. They poten­ti­ate the radi­ation and thus make it pos­sible to admin­is­ter a lower level of irra­di­ation for a con­stant bio­lo­gic­al effect. This reduces the side effects, too.

Oth­er nan­o­particles release drugs when irra­di­ated. They form an inert cage that traps cyto­tox­ic molecules. Under the loc­al action of radi­ation, the cage opens and releases the anti-can­cer treat­ment. This approach is designed to pre­vent the patient from being sub­jec­ted to gen­er­al drug tox­icity. Only the irra­di­ated area is in con­tact with the cyto­tox­ic molecules.

And that’s just to men­tion thera­peut­ic pro­gress because dia­gnos­is, with the major pro­gress made in can­cer ima­ging, is anoth­er area that is fed by pro­gress in the phys­ic­al sciences.

* dose: the energy depos­ited on a mass of tissue

Interview by Agnes Vernet
1Favaud­on et al. Sci­ence Transl Med 2014  doi : 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008973 https://​www​.sci​ence​.org/​d​o​i​/​1​0​.​1​1​2​6​/​s​c​i​t​r​a​n​s​l​m​e​d​.​3​0​08973
2Bayart et al. Sci­entif­ic Reports 2019 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019–46512‑1

Contributors

Alessandro Flacco

Alessandro Flacco

Associate professor at ENSTA Paris (IP Paris)

Alessandro Flacco works on the application of laser particle sources to biology and medicine. He has long worked on the physics of plasmas created by very high intensity lasers and on the acceleration of protons by laser-matter interaction. He is an associate professor at ENSTA Paris and a researcher at LOA (Laboratoire d'Optique Appliquée: joint research unit CNRS, ENSTA, École Polytechnique).

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate