Home / Chroniques / Transforming organic waste into hydrogen using marine bacteria
Sorted kitchen waste in paper eco bag on green background. Compo
π Energy π Science and technology

Transforming organic waste into hydrogen using marine bacteria

Pierre-Pol Liebgott
Pierre-Pol Liebgott
Researcher in Microbiology at IRD
Hanah ganou
Hana Gannoun
Lecturer in Biochemical Engineering, specialising in "Environmental Bioprocesses and Bioenergies" at UTM-ISSBAT
Key takeaways
  • While Europe is aiming for a low-carbon world by 2050, 99.3% of hydrogen (a major vector of the energy transition) is currently produced by fossil fuels.
  • One way of producing low-carbon hydrogen is high-temperature fermentation.
  • This involves incubating food waste with a marine bacterium under very specific conditions, leading to the degradation of bio-waste.
  • Hurdles to overcome include higher bio-hydrogen production and recovery of solid product after fermentation.

Hydro­gen is an ener­gy source favou­red by the French govern­ment to decar­bo­nise trans­port. To date, 99.3% of the world’s hydro­gen is pro­du­ced using fos­sil fuels. Only water elec­tro­ly­sis gene­rates low-car­bon hydro­gen. Of all the known low-car­bon pro­duc­tion methods, the BIOTEC H2 inter­na­tio­nal joint labo­ra­to­ry – due to open in Ham­ma­met in 2022 – is dedi­ca­ted to the pro­duc­tion of bio­hy­dro­gen by dark fer­men­ta­tion at high temperature.

What does hydrogen production by “dark fermentation” involve ?

Hana Gan­noun. This pro­cess is based on the reco­ve­ry of fruit and vege­table waste by ace­tic fer­men­ta­tion. We use a marine bac­te­rium, Ther­mo­to­ga mari­ti­ma1. The waste and bac­te­ria are pla­ced with sea­wa­ter in a bio­reac­tor. The bio­reac­tor is hea­ted to 80°C, main­tai­ned without light or oxy­gen, and the agi­ta­tion and pH are control­led to pro­vide opti­mum condi­tions for the bac­te­ria to grow. The degra­da­tion of bio­waste by bac­te­ria pro­duces dihy­dro­gen (H2), CO2 and acetate.

Pierre-Pol Lieb­gott. This pro­cess has been known about for twen­ty years, and there are no obs­tacles to pro­du­cing bio­hy­dro­gen. We have demons­tra­ted the fea­si­bi­li­ty of this pro­cess in a 2L fer­men­ter fed with waste from food mar­kets in Tunisia.

Why use marine bacteria ?

HG. We wan­ted to use marine bac­te­ria so that we could sup­ply the reac­tor with salt water. This avoids adding an addi­tio­nal use to the fre­sh­wa­ter resource.

PPL. From the taxo­no­mic map of exis­ting micro-orga­nisms, we chose Ther­mo­to­ga mari­ti­ma, which is a very spe­cial marine micro-orga­nism : it is poly­ex­tre­mo­phi­lic. This means that it can withs­tand very high tem­pe­ra­tures and high salt concen­tra­tions. In nature, this bac­te­rium thrives in under­wa­ter hydro­ther­mal springs. Why choose these spe­ci­fic cha­rac­te­ris­tics ? In a sugar-rich envi­ron­ment, many conta­mi­na­ting bac­te­ria can deve­lop and dis­rupt the reac­tion. But at 80°C, no conta­mi­na­tion can deve­lop, ensu­ring that only Ther­mo­to­ga mari­ti­ma is at work.

High-tem­pe­ra­ture fer­men­ta­tion has ano­ther advan­tage : it is more ener­gy-effi­cient. Fer­men­ta­tion is a pro­cess that releases heat, and main­tai­ning a fer­men­ter at a tem­pe­ra­ture of 20°C requires cooling. Cooling requires more ener­gy than hea­ting, for which we use a solar water heater.

What are the advantages of this process compared with other ways of producing hydrogen ?

PPL. Bio­lo­gi­cal pro­cesses are inex­pen­sive and require less ener­gy. To pro­duce 1 mole of hydro­gen, you need 0.2 moles of ener­gy with a micro­bial elec­tro­ly­sis cell. This figure rises to 1.7 for water elec­tro­ly­sis. Above all, dark fer­men­ta­tion makes it pos­sible to uti­lise an enor­mous amount of orga­nic mat­ter. In France, almost a third of hou­se­hold waste is putres­cible, and its col­lec­tion is now com­pul­so­ry. In Tuni­sia, this figure is 70%, and much of this waste is dum­ped direct­ly into public land­fill sites.

HG. We are wor­king to improve the way we handle waste over the course of the year. We have three stu­dy sites : a who­le­sale mar­ket in Tunis, a muni­ci­pal mar­ket and a hotel. The Tuni­sian govern­ment wants to set up a mana­ge­ment sys­tem for this type of waste : our objec­tive is to ensure that the bio­reac­tor ope­rates in a stable and effi­cient way throu­ghout the year.

Isn’t it more advantageous to convert organic waste into methane rather than biohydrogen ?

P‑P. L. Metha­ni­sa­tion is sim­pler to imple­ment, and the pro­cess is alrea­dy rela­ti­ve­ly well deve­lo­ped. But methane is less advan­ta­geous from an ener­gy point of view. Moreo­ver, hydro­gen is in the pro­cess of being adop­ted more wide­ly in Europe, spur­red on by seve­ral invest­ment plans. By conver­ting orga­nic waste into bioH2, we pro­pose to make the most of the infra­struc­tures – pro­duc­tion, dis­tri­bu­tion, etc. – that will be implemented.

What is the yield of the H2 bioproduction process ?

PPL. The theo­re­ti­cal yield is around 4 moles of H2 per mole of sugar, but in rea­li­ty it is cur­rent­ly less than 3, which is still a good result. In prac­tice, with one tonne of waste, we pro­duce one kilo of bioH2.

HG. We are cur­rent­ly loo­king to improve this yield. To do this, we are stu­dying other marine micro-orga­nisms and also syn­the­tic consor­tia – mix­tures of seve­ral bac­te­rial strains.

Once the process is fully developed, how could it be implemented ?

PPL. The pro­cess is still in its ear­ly stages : we’re at TRL 3–4, which cor­res­ponds to a small-scale pro­to­type. We will short­ly be upgra­ding from a 2 litre to a 10 litre fer­men­ter. But we’re not aiming to use large volumes, like large metha­ni­sa­tion units. The aim is to deve­lop a unit desi­gned for domes­tic pro­duc­tion of bioH2 from hou­se­hold waste. This will enable us to tar­get a less com­pe­ti­tive mar­ket and offer people ener­gy independence.

After fermentation, is there a solid digestate as in a methanisation unit ? If so, are there any ways of recycling it ?

HG. Yes, we’re tal­king about slur­ry. It’s an aspect we’re wor­king on because we’re trying to take a com­plete cir­cu­lar eco­no­my approach. Unlike diges­tate from metha­ni­sa­tion, there are seve­ral obs­tacles to the reco­ve­ry of slur­ry : it is rich in salt and orga­nic fat­ty acids. It is the­re­fore not pos­sible to use it on agri­cul­tu­ral soils. We are wor­king on the solid frac­tion of the slur­ry : by com­pos­ting it, it would be pos­sible to pro­duce enzymes or poly­mers that could be used in packaging.

PPL. If we suc­ceed in trea­ting the fer­men­ta­tion slur­ry, our pro­cess will be a com­pe­ti­tor to methane production.

Anaïs Marechal
1https://​doi​.org/​1​0​.​1​0​1​6​/​j​.​w​a​s​m​a​n​.​2​0​1​7​.​0​9.042

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate