Home / Chroniques / Giant viruses, enigmatic microscopic behemoths you should know about
tribune05_Tania-Louis_EN
π Planet π Health and biotech

Giant viruses, enigmatic microscopic behemoths you should know about

Tania Louis
Tania Louis
PhD in biology and Columnist at Polytechnique Insights
Key takeaways
  • In 2003, researchers thought they were examining a bacterium under a microscope before realising that it was a very large virus, called "mimivirus".
  • Mimivirus is 0.7 µm, three times longer than the known length of viruses at the time, which is 0.2 µm.
  • Many cousins of mimivirus were quickly discovered, as well as pandoravirus, pithovirus and other molliviruses.
  • Metagenomics has made it possible to discover these giant viruses, of which there are thousands.
  • Many questions remain unanswered, especially concerning the genomes of the giant viruses, the content of which bears no resemblance to anything we have ever known.

In 1992, an epi­dem­ic of legionnaire’s dis­ease hit the Eng­lish city of Brad­ford and com­pletely changed vir­o­logy forever, even though this dis­ease is caused by bac­teria! Those of the Legion­ella genus, which live in warm water and usu­ally mul­tiply at the expense of amoe­bas (small organ­isms com­posed of a single cell, whose func­tion­ing is closer to that of our own cells than to that of bacteria).

A French discovery from England

One of the dis­tin­guish­ing fea­tures of Legion­naires’ dis­ease is that it is not trans­mit­ted dir­ectly from human to human, but via aer­o­sols from envir­on­ments con­tam­in­ated by the bac­teria. To identi­fy the ori­gin of the Brad­ford epi­dem­ic, micro­bi­o­lo­gist Timothy Row­botham took a few samples in search of the fam­ous Legion­ella and the amoe­bae they parasitise.

Legion­ella bac­teria mul­tiply­ing in a human fibro­blast (cul­tured in vitro). Cred­it: CDC/Dr. Edwin P. Ewing, Jr. via Wiki­me­dia Commons.

Look­ing under a light micro­scope at a sample recovered from the hos­pit­al­’s cool­ing tower, Row­botham found that it did indeed con­tain amoe­bae, which in turn con­tained what looked like bac­teria… but whose shape did not match that of Legion­ella. He named this new microbe “Brad­ford coc­cus” and tried to char­ac­ter­ise it with tools adap­ted to the study of bac­teria for sev­er­al years. But to no avail.

The sample was returned to a freez­er and then, in 1995, the young research­er Richard Birtles, leav­ing to do a post-doc­tor­ate in Mar­seille, took some of it with him1. At first, the French research­ers did no bet­ter than the Eng­lish: it was impossible to char­ac­ter­ise the gen­ome of Brad­ford coc­cus… Until someone had the idea of observing this so-called bac­teri­um with an elec­tron micro­scope, which had suf­fi­cient mag­ni­fic­a­tion power to real­ise that it was in fact a vir­us, of aston­ish­ing size.

A few years later, three research teams from Mar­seille shared their res­ults in a paper entitled “A giant amoeba vir­us”2. Timothy Row­botham had unknow­ingly isol­ated a vir­us cap­able of infect­ing amoe­bas and meas­ur­ing about 0.7 µm in dia­met­er. In hon­our of its ini­tial con­fu­sion with a bac­teri­um, it was named mim­ivir­us, lit­er­ally “microbe-mim­ick­ing”.

Giant viruses, a major discovery

The descrip­tion of this vir­us in 2003 was revolu­tion­ary! It took years to under­stand the true nature of mim­ivir­uses as nobody at the time thought that such large vir­uses could exist. And with good reas­on. At the end of the 19th Cen­tury, the abil­ity of vir­uses to pass through the pores of fil­ters fine enough to retain bac­teria was one of the first char­ac­ter­ist­ics that allowed them to be iden­ti­fied as a new type of infec­tious agent. In oth­er words, vir­uses had always been defined as being smal­ler than bac­teria, which are on aver­age 1 µm in length, but were con­sidered to be up to about 0.2 µm in size. This is three times smal­ler than the size of mimiviruses.

Mim­ivir­us particle observed under the elec­tron micro­scope3.

How­ever, this micro­scop­ic colos­sus is not an excep­tion and the dis­cov­er­ies of giant vir­uses have fol­lowed one after the oth­er since 2003, not­ably thanks to the work of the Gen­om­ic and Struc­tur­al Inform­a­tion labor­at­ory, now dir­ec­ted by Chant­al Abergel4. Many rel­at­ives of mim­ivir­uses are now known, grouped togeth­er in the Mim­ivi­rid­ae fam­ily. As well as pan­doravir­uses, pithovir­uses and oth­er mol­li­vir­uses: as is often the case in bio­logy, the more we look for giant vir­uses, the more we find them!

Some of these dis­cov­er­ies are real achieve­ments: pithovir­uses5 and mol­li­vir­uses6 were ini­tially isol­ated from per­ma­frost that was about 30 000 years old. This has not pre­ven­ted them, in the expert hands of research­ers, from still being able to infect amoe­bas. To show that this is not so unusu­al, the same team recently pub­lished a pre­print in which they revived no less than 13 dif­fer­ent amoeba vir­uses in the same way7.

Family portrait

Although the first giant vir­uses were iden­ti­fied by co-cul­tur­ing with hosts sus­cept­ible to infec­tion (mainly amoe­bae), over the past ten years a new tool has accel­er­ated the pace of dis­cov­ery: meta­ge­n­om­ics. This tech­nique, which com­bines massive sequen­cing and bioin­form­at­ics ana­lyses, has led to an explo­sion in the num­ber of known giant vir­uses that now num­ber in the thou­sands8.

They are par­tic­u­larly numer­ous in the ocean, but they are also found in soils and lakes. And it is clear that we are only just begin­ning to under­stand the quant­ity, dis­tri­bu­tion and diversity of these vir­uses. If one were to sketch a fam­ily por­trait, all known giant vir­uses have gen­omes com­posed of double-stran­ded DNA and most of them form vir­al factor­ies in the cells they infect, which are exactly what their name describes. Their size can reach up to 2 µm in length for tupan­vir­uses, a mem­ber of the Mim­ivi­rid­ae9 and their gen­omes meas­ure up to 2.5 mil­lion base pairs for pan­doravir­uses10.

Left: Amoeba infec­ted with pan­doravir­us and pro­du­cing vir­al particles (envir­on­ment­al bac­teria are also vis­ible in the cul­ture medi­um around the amoeba). Scale bar: 10 µm. Right: Pan­doravir­us particles observed under the elec­tron micro­scope, sur­roun­ded by amoeba pseudo­po­dia11. Scale bar: 0.5 µm.

It is not clear which organ­isms are nat­ur­ally infec­ted with giant vir­uses, espe­cially when they are iden­ti­fied by meta­ge­n­om­ics. Dif­fer­ent approaches, such as search­ing for gen­omes that are sys­tem­at­ic­ally asso­ci­ated with vir­uses in samples, sug­gest that giant vir­uses can infect a large num­ber of euk­a­ryot­ic microor­gan­isms, not just amoe­bae12. The list is far from defin­it­ive at present, but the longer it goes on, the more likely it is that these vir­uses will have sig­ni­fic­ant impacts on ecosystems.

Many unresolved questions

Of all the things we have yet to dis­cov­er and under­stand about giant vir­uses, it is their gen­omes that prob­ably raise the most ques­tions. Not only are they dis­pro­por­tion­ately long (for vir­uses), but their con­tent is aston­ish­ing. Firstly, because a large pro­por­tion of the genes (some­times more than 90%!13) often don’t resemble any­thing known to us. It is impossible to know where they come from or what they are used for. Secondly, because some of the genes that we do under­stand have nev­er been observed in vir­uses before.

Indeed, giant vir­uses have genes involved in cel­lu­lar pro­cesses, such as DNA rep­lic­a­tion or the expres­sion of genet­ic inform­a­tion. They are far from being autonom­ous, but this still raises ques­tions about their degree of depend­ence, their ori­gin, and their evol­u­tion­ary his­tory14. In 2008, the iden­ti­fic­a­tion of vir­uses cap­able of infect­ing giant vir­uses that were them­selves infect­ing an amoeba added anoth­er piece to this puzzle15.

Unknown only twenty years ago, giant vir­uses are reg­u­larly the sub­ject of new dis­cov­er­ies and each one raises its own set of ques­tions. With many in the oceans and inter­act­ing with micro-organ­isms that play key roles in oxy­gen pro­duc­tion or atmo­spher­ic CO2 cap­ture, they may not be heard of out­side vir­o­logy journ­als. But bey­ond their poten­tial impact, they are fas­cin­at­ing in that they make us rethink how we define terms like ‘vir­us’ and ‘liv­ing’.

1https://​www​.ncbi​.nlm​.nih​.gov/​p​m​c​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​/​P​M​C​7​0​9​6837/
2https://​www​.sci​ence​.org/​d​o​i​/​1​0​.​1​1​2​6​/​s​c​i​e​n​c​e​.​1​0​81867
3https://​journ​als​.plos​.org/​p​l​o​s​p​a​t​h​o​g​e​n​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​?​i​d​=​1​0​.​1​3​7​1​/​j​o​u​r​n​a​l​.​p​p​a​t​.​1​0​00087
4https://​www​.igs​.cnrs​-mrs​.fr/
5https://​www​.pnas​.org/​d​o​i​/​f​u​l​l​/​1​0​.​1​0​7​3​/​p​n​a​s​.​1​3​2​0​6​70111
6https://​www​.pnas​.org/​d​o​i​/​f​u​l​l​/​1​0​.​1​0​7​3​/​p​n​a​s​.​1​5​1​0​7​95112
7https://​www​.biorx​iv​.org/​c​o​n​t​e​n​t​/​1​0​.​1​1​0​1​/​2​0​2​2​.​1​1​.​1​0​.​5​1​5​937v1
8https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020‑1957‑x
9https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018–03168‑1
10https://​www​.sci​ence​.org/​d​o​i​/​1​0​.​1​1​2​6​/​s​c​i​e​n​c​e​.​1​2​39181
11From https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018–04698‑4
12https://www.nature.com/articles/s41579-022–00754‑5
13https://​www​.sci​ence​.org/​d​o​i​/​1​0​.​1​1​2​6​/​s​c​i​e​n​c​e​.​1​2​39181
14https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369848616300097?via%3Dihub
15https://​www​.nature​.com/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​/​n​a​t​u​r​e​07218

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate