Home / Chroniques / Intelligent fertilisers reduce agricultural pollution
Nicol
π Planet π Industry

Intelligent fertilisers reduce agricultural pollution

Graeme Nicol
Graeme Nicol
CNRS Research director in soil microbial ecology at Ecole Centrale de Lyon

Since the 19th cen­tu­ry we know that cer­tain microor­ga­nisms play a key role in the nitro­gen cycle. They are res­pon­sible for car­rying out essen­tial steps in the pro­cess, pro­du­cing dif­ferent forms of nitro­gen that can be used by plants. Nitro­gen-based fer­ti­li­sers used in agri­cul­ture acce­le­rate this cycle with major envi­ron­men­tal and eco­no­mic conse­quences. Thus, an ‘intel­li­gent’, slow and pro­gres­sive dis­tri­bu­tion of nitro­gen could be used to limit many of these nega­tive effects.

Fertilisers put nitrogen into soil

Plants need nitro­gen to grow, using either ammo­nium or nitrate (nitro­gen-rich mole­cules) as a source. Ammo­nium finds its way natu­ral­ly into soil at a rate of 110 mil­lion tonnes per year. This hap­pens through depo­si­tion after light­ning and the death of orga­nic mate­rial, but main­ly via the fixa­tion of nitro­gen from the atmos­phere such as in the nodules of legu­mi­nous plants. Nitrate, howe­ver, is the result of conver­sion from ammo­nium by microorganisms. 

Even though plants can take up both, it is the conver­sion of ammo­nium to nitrate, which has major conse­quences on agri­cul­tu­ral sys­tems. Vast quan­ti­ties of nitro­gen (an addi­tio­nal 100 mil­lion tonnes per year) added to soil in the form of fer­ti­li­sers acce­le­rates micro­bial acti­vi­ty, resul­ting in the over­pro­duc­tion of nitrate from ammonium.

This excess nitrate is res­pon­sible for the nega­tive envi­ron­men­tal impact because it makes the nitro­gen more mobile, increa­sing its pol­lu­tion poten­tial by allo­wing it to move out of the soil in water or even into the air. Nitrate pol­lu­tion in runoff water, ground­wa­ter and rivers encou­rages algal blooms and conta­mi­nates drin­king water. It also leads to sub­stan­tial increases in the emis­sion of nitrous oxide (N2O), the third most impor­tant green­house gas, concen­tra­tions of which have increa­sed by 20% since pre-indus­trial times. N2O is also tip­ped as the com­pound pri­ma­ri­ly res­pon­sible for deple­tion of stra­tos­phe­ric ozone in the 21st Century. 

Nitrates pol­lute run-off water and rivers, conta­mi­nate under­ground drin­king water resources and pro­mote the growth of algae.

Intelligent fertilisers : a smart solution

The main effect of ‘intel­li­gent’ fer­ti­li­sers is to favour a slow, gra­dual release of nitro­gen over weeks into soil. In doing so, the pro­por­tion that is actual­ly used by the plants is increa­sed, the­re­by increa­sing effi­cien­cy of the fer­ti­li­ser. Hence, the acti­vi­ty of soil microor­ga­nisms is redu­ced and the­re­fore less ammo­nium is conver­ted to nitrate. The result of such is less nitrate avai­lable to leach into water­ways, redu­cing pollution. 

Ano­ther bene­fit of pro­gres­sive-release fer­ti­li­sers is to reduce hazar­dous N2O emis­sions. Stu­dies have shown that large-scale, rapid appli­ca­tion of ammo­nium fer­ti­li­sers favours growth in microor­ga­nism popu­la­tions capable of trans­for­ming them at high concen­tra­tions. This results in a dra­ma­tic increase in acti­vi­ty of cer­tain micro­bial popu­la­tions, par­ti­cu­lar­ly those which contri­bute the most to nitrous oxide emis­sions. Hence, by using a slow-release fer­ti­li­ser ins­tead, the ove­rac­ti­vi­ty of these microor­ga­nisms is pre­ven­ted resul­ting in lower emissions. 

These pro­gres­sive-release fer­ti­li­sers respond ade­qua­te­ly to some of the pro­blems posed by tra­di­tio­nal fer­ti­li­sers, at least. But this is not the only approach we can take. Ano­ther example is to use inhi­bi­tors to limit the growth of bac­te­rial popu­la­tions that cause the nega­tive conse­quences of nitro­gen trans­for­ma­tion. The idea is not to remove them, or ste­ri­lise them, but rather it starves them, to control their activity. 

This allows for both bet­ter control of the nitro­gen balance in soil and ensures that crops will bene­fit from most of the added nitro­gen fer­ti­li­ser ins­tead, making it pos­sible to reduce the quan­ti­ties added to soil. The two approaches are not exclu­sive, of course. Any­thing that makes it pos­sible to reduce nitro­gen-asso­cia­ted pol­lu­tion in inten­sive agri­cul­ture is welcome.

Contributors

Graeme Nicol

Graeme Nicol

CNRS Research director in soil microbial ecology at Ecole Centrale de Lyon

Graeme Nicol was previously a university lecturer at the University of Aberdeen in Scotland. He joined Ecole Centrale de Lyon in 2015 as the AXA Research Fund Chair in Ecosystem Engineering and Microbial Ecology. His research interests are focused on understanding the contribution of microorganisms to the soil nitrogen cycle.

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate