3_enjeuxIndus
π Health and biotech
Beyond Covid: the promise of mRNA vaccines

Bioproduction of mRNA vaccines : a global industrial challenge ?

with Agnès Vernet, Science journalist
On December 8th, 2021 |
4min reading time
Emmanuel Dequier
Emmanuel Dequier
Programme Manager for Grand Challenge Bioproduction
Key takeaways
  • RNA molecules have inestimable potential for the medicine of tomorrow. However, its bioproduction requires technical steps that put it at the crossroads between technological issues and industrial policies.
  • For the production of pharmaceutical grade RNA, steps must be certified as Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP). The production of certified template DNA is limited in the United States, so obtaining it involves a time constraint of several months.
  • Today, numerous technical innovations allow us to limit all these production constraints, and a lot of research continues to move in this direction.
  • The global pharmaceutical market is worth over $1,300bn. If we include new biotechnologies, it could reach $4,800bn. This is an unsustainable amount for our health systems, so the issue of finance is central to the future of biotherapies.

RNAs are of inter­est in many medi­cal fields. Howe­ver, to ful­ly unders­tand their value and bring them to patients we need to be able to pro­duce them. RNA bio­pro­duc­tion is at the cross­roads bet­ween tech­no­lo­gi­cal issues and indus­trial policy.

The last few months have shown that we are capable of deli­ve­ring bil­lions of doses of mes­sen­ger RNA (mRNA) vac­cines. This might lead us to believe that the pro­duc­tion sys­tems for these bio­lo­gi­cal mole­cules are rea­dy. Howe­ver, in rea­li­ty, this is not the case. New manu­fac­tu­ring capa­ci­ties need to be anti­ci­pa­ted : more and more cli­ni­cal trials are eva­lua­ting RNAs in medi­cal appli­ca­tions, for example in can­ce­ro­lo­gy, as a treat­ment for emer­ging diseases or gene­tic diseases. These are mRNAs, as in the case of vac­cines against Covid-19, or other types of RNAs, anti­sense or effec­tors, which block or acti­vate bio­lo­gi­cal pro­cesses. The­ra­peu­tic inter­est in these mole­cules is gro­wing rapid­ly and pro­duc­tion tools and tech­no­lo­gies need to keep pace.

To appre­ciate the issues at stake, it is impor­tant to look at pro­duc­tion pro­cess. RNAs are syn­the­si­sed in vitro using a DNA tem­plate and an enzyme : RNA poly­me­rase. The RNA is then puri­fied on chro­ma­to­gra­phy columns, which take advan­tage of che­mi­cal pro­per­ties (pH or affi­ni­ty) to sepa­rate the com­po­nents of the solu­tion and iso­late the pro­duct of inter­est. Final­ly, the RNA mole­cules are asso­cia­ted with vec­tors, i.e. enve­lopes that pro­tect these fra­gile mole­cules and faci­li­tate their entry into the cell when the RNA drug is administered.

In short supply

In order to pro­duce phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal grade RNA, all these steps must be cer­ti­fied as Good Manu­fac­tu­ring Prac­tice (GMP). This stan­dard is based on a large num­ber of controls to ensure patient safe­ty, star­ting with the pro­duc­tion of tem­plate DNA. Glo­bal­ly, there are very few manu­fac­tu­rers able to per­form this step in accor­dance with GMP stan­dards and none are loca­ted in Europe. The main pro­du­cers of GMP DNA tem­plates are in the US and it takes many months to get access to the desi­red DNA. Glo­bal­ly, there is the­re­fore a high demand for this pro­duct that is in short sup­ply, a situa­tion which has been exa­cer­ba­ted by the covid-19 pan­de­mic. In res­ponse, the Resi­lience part of the France Relance reco­ve­ry plan* has pro­vi­ded the Besan­çon-based com­pa­ny RD Bio­tech with €2 mil­lion in for the construc­tion of a new GMP stan­dard DNA pro­duc­tion site of over 1,000 m².

There are also sup­ply issues concer­ning access to the enzyme, RNA poly­me­rase, which reads the DNA tem­plate in order to syn­the­sise RNA. Howe­ver, Enzyme pro­duc­tion is well control­led, and the phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal indus­try the­re­fore tends to inter­na­lise it to secure its supply.

Final­ly, these pro­cesses require a large num­ber of consu­mables (fil­ter, plas­tic bag, etc.). The major pro­du­cers of these mate­rials are also out­side Europe and there is cur­rent­ly a mar­ket shor­tage when it comes to these pro­ducts. In res­ponse to the health cri­sis, manu­fac­tu­rers are now orga­ni­sing them­selves in order to avoid sup­ply dis­rup­tions in the event of fur­ther bor­der clo­sures. For example, the Merck com­pa­ny is going to set up a new pro­duc­tion unit for ste­rile bags, neces­sa­ry for the pro­duc­tion of vac­cines, in Mol­sheim in Alsace.

Industrial innovations

Indus­trial research is pre­pa­ring new pro­cesses in paral­lel with these short-term adjust­ments. The plan is to move from in vitro pro­duc­tion (enzy­ma­tic syn­the­sis) to in vivo pro­duc­tion, by using yeast to pro­duce the RNA. This stra­te­gy has many advan­tages. First­ly, it avoids the need to pro­duce RNA poly­me­rase, which is natu­ral­ly pro­du­ced by yeast. Second­ly, it limits the indus­trial risks asso­cia­ted with the use of very large volumes of high­ly explo­sive etha­nol during the pro­duc­tion pro­cess. Third­ly, as the cells are equip­ped with mul­tiple sys­tems to improve the accu­ra­cy of the trans­crip­tion (by lowe­ring the error rate inherent in each RNA poly­me­rase), the RNA pro­du­ced will be of higher qua­li­ty. It will also be pos­sible to pro­duce lon­ger RNAs and to deve­lop increa­sin­gly com­plex appli­ca­tions such as mul­ti­va­lent vac­cines, nota­bly with vac­cines direc­ted against dif­ferent flu variants. Final­ly, in vivo pro­duc­tion will allow modi­fi­ca­tions to be made to the mole­cule after it has been syn­the­si­sed, still in the yeast cell. These modi­fi­ca­tions can, for example, ‘huma­nise’ the bio­mo­le­cule and thus increase its lifes­pan and effec­ti­ve­ness in human cells.

In vivo pro­duc­tion sys­tems such as this one are being deve­lo­ped in France as part of a col­la­bo­ra­tive pro­gramme sup­por­ted for which Grand Défi “Bio­me­di­cines : impro­ving yields and control­ling pro­duc­tion costs” has pro­vi­ded €1.4M of sup­port. This research pro­gramme led by Chan­tal Pichon (Univ. d’Or­léan) at the CNRS Mole­cu­lar Bio­phy­sics Centre, in part­ner­ship with INSERM, INRAe, and the Poly­thé­ra­gène and Sano­fi-Pas­teur com­pa­nies, is expec­ted to reach indus­trial matu­ri­ty in three to five years. The French phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal giant has also shown its willin­gness to deve­lop its RNA pro­duc­tion by acqui­ring the Ame­ri­can bio­tech­no­lo­gy com­pa­ny Trans­late Bio. It plans to set up an RNA pro­duc­tion unit at its Mar­cy-l’É­toile site in the Lyon region.

A sustainable price

Other ave­nues of research com­bine a medi­cal and eco­no­mic advan­tage. They focus on addres­sing the­ra­peu­tic mole­cules, i.e. the pre­ci­sion with which RNAs reach the patient’s tar­get cells. By redu­cing the dis­per­sion of the mole­cules in the body, the risk of side effects from the treat­ments is redu­ced. It also reduces the effec­tive dose, and the­re­fore the total cost of treatment.

The price of bio­the­ra­pies and the­re­fore of RNA is a major issue. In the case of anti-covid vac­cines, the doses of RNA requi­red are small. Lar­ger quan­ti­ties of bio­mo­le­cules will be nee­ded for can­cer appli­ca­tions. As is often the case with bio­me­di­cal inno­va­tions, it will be a ques­tion of fin­ding a balance bet­ween the finan­cing of phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal research, pro­duc­tion costs and the acces­si­bi­li­ty of pro­ducts for all. The glo­bal phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal mar­ket as a whole is cur­rent­ly worth more than $1,300bn. If the new bio­tech­no­lo­gies cove­red all needs, this mar­ket would be worth $4,800bn, which is not sus­tai­nable for our health sys­tems. The phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal indus­try is aware that it will not be able to sell inno­va­tive the­ra­peu­tic pro­ducts tomor­row if this trend conti­nues. The finan­cial issue is the­re­fore cri­ti­cal to the suc­cess of future of biotherapies.

To meet this chal­lenge of acces­si­bi­li­ty to inno­va­tive the­ra­pies, the research com­mu­ni­ty and indus­try are wor­king to deve­lop tech­no­lo­gies with more eco­no­mi­cal pro­duc­tion while gua­ran­teeing patient safe­ty. France wants to be a major player in this sec­tor and the State sup­ports this sec­tor within the fra­me­work of its Stra­te­gy for Acce­le­ra­ting Bio­the­ra­pies and Bio­pro­duc­tion of Inno­va­tive The­ra­pies finan­ced via the Future Invest­ment Pro­gramme and announ­ced by the Pre­sident of the Repu­blic during his speech on the Health Inno­va­tion 2030 plan.

* The France Reco­ve­ry Plan is a set of invest­ments, to the tune of €100bn, sup­por­ted by the Euro­pean Union with fun­ding of approxi­ma­te­ly €40bn, deployed by the Govern­ment since 2020 around three com­po­nents : eco­lo­gi­cal tran­si­tion, com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness and cohe­sion. This plan was set in motion with a view to rapid­ly revi­ving the eco­no­my and obtai­ning results in terms of decar­bo­ni­sa­tion, indus­trial recon­quest, and the streng­the­ning of skills and qua­li­fi­ca­tions throu­ghout the country.

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate