Home / Chroniques / Photovoltaics: what future can we expect for Europe?
π Energy π Science and technology

Photovoltaics : what future can we expect for Europe ?

Gerard Creuzet
Gérard Creuzet
President of Institut Photovoltaïque d’Île-de-France
Key takeaways
  • The global photovoltaic industry is currently concentrated in China. But the unprecedented growth of the market is opening up opportunities for European players, who are benefiting from three trends.
  • After a long period of incremental progress, where the difference was only in price, technological accelerations are being achieved in Europe.
  • In areas such as automotive, agriculture and construction, various niches could open the way to new market segments for highly differentiated products, far from the commodity logic that currently dominates.
  • Finally, European regulations are evolving, with more focus on the life cycle assessment (less carbon-intensive production, recyclability), which is likely to change the situation.

In pho­to­vol­taics, what dif­fe­rences are there bet­ween offers other than on price ?

It is true that, in terms of tech­no­lo­gy, the solar panel indus­try is cur­rent­ly cha­rac­te­ri­sed by a cer­tain homo­ge­nei­ty. Most players use poly­crys­tal­line or qua­si-mono­crys­tal­line sili­con tech­no­lo­gy, imple­men­ted in dif­ferent architectures.

This does not mean that there is no inno­va­tion, but rather that inno­va­tion has so far fol­lo­wed an incre­men­tal logic. The impro­ve­ments are none­the­less signi­fi­cant over time, both in terms of per­for­mance and cost. Concer­ning the per­for­mance of devices : the first panel pro­per, deve­lo­ped in 1954 by Bell Labs (for­ty years after the first tests of sili­con pho­to­vol­taic cells), had an effi­cien­cy of 6%. A few years ago, it was 13 or 14%, and today a good pro­por­tion of the solar panels on the mar­ket have an effi­cien­cy of around 20%.

The cost of solar panels has fal­len by 80% in ten years for good, and bad, reasons.

As for the cost of panels, it has fal­len by 80% in ten years, for good and bad rea­sons : the good rea­sons are tech­no­lo­gi­cal pro­gress and the sca­ling up of the ener­gy tran­si­tion. The bad rea­sons are mas­sive sub­si­dies, par­ti­cu­lar­ly in Ger­ma­ny, which ins­tead of hel­ping Euro­pean indus­try to take off have led to indus­trial over­ca­pa­ci­ty and a price war in which only a few Chi­nese manu­fac­tu­rers have been able to sur­vive ; they now exert an overw­hel­ming domi­na­tion over the mar­ket. Today, price is the main cri­te­rion, well ahead of per­for­mance, both for ins­tal­lers of pho­to­vol­taic parks and for pri­vate individuals.

Does this mean that the game is up for the Euro­pean industry ?

No, for at least three rea­sons. The first is that the mar­ket is boo­ming, and there is room for new players. We do not yet have the final figures for 2022, but in 2021, accor­ding to the Inter­na­tio­nal Ener­gy Agen­cy, world pho­to­vol­taic ener­gy pro­duc­tion increa­sed by 179 TWh (i.e. + 22%), a record, to exceed 1000 TWh. This growth is dri­ven by the Chi­nese mar­ket, fol­lo­wed by the US and the EU.  Accor­ding to the Uni­ted Nations Net Zero sce­na­rio, an annual solar PV pro­duc­tion level of about 7400 TWh will have to be rea­ched in 2030. Star­ting from the cur­rent 1000 TWh, this implies an ave­rage pro­duc­tion growth of about 25% per year during the per­iod 2022–2030.

In this huge mar­ket, pro­duc­tion in Chi­na will remain domi­nant, and we must look clo­se­ly at what is hap­pe­ning in the US. But the growth of the Euro­pean mar­ket will also be very impor­tant, which opens up pros­pects for Euro­pean players to get back into the race because – this is the second rea­son – we are ente­ring a phase of matu­ri­ty of seve­ral tech­no­lo­gi­cal inno­va­tions which, without being dis­rup­tive in the strict sense of the word, consti­tute deci­sive acce­le­ra­tions, with tru­ly new technologies. 

The most pro­mi­sing are the ‘tan­dem’ cells that com­bine sili­con and per­ovs­kite. This makes it pos­sible to bet­ter exploit the solar spec­trum, adding ultra­vio­let light to visible light and infra­red light (well cap­tu­red by sili­con). Such tech­no­lo­gy shifts the theo­re­ti­cal bar­rier that pre­vious­ly pla­ced the maxi­mum effi­cien­cy at just over 29%. It is now around 40%. In the labo­ra­to­ry, we are alrea­dy going very far : last Sep­tem­ber, Dutch resear­chers suc­cee­ded for the first time in cros­sing the 30% effi­cien­cy thre­shold. Indus­tria­li­sa­tion is in sight : the IPVF, which brings toge­ther the strengths of many players (inclu­ding EDF, Tota­lE­ner­gies, the CNRS and the Ecole Poly­tech­nique), is going to ins­tall the first pro­duc­tion line in Alsace using this sili­con-per­ovs­kite tan­dem tech­no­lo­gy with its indus­trial part­ner, Vol­tec Solar. Europe is the­re­fore at the fore­front of this break­through tech­no­lo­gy, both in research and development.

A third rea­son is that while the com­mo­di­ti­sa­tion of solar panels will conti­nue, with stan­dar­di­sed pro­ducts, we are now also wit­nes­sing the deve­lop­ment of a mar­ket with much more varied appli­ca­tions, dri­ven by a logic of dif­fe­ren­tia­tion. I will give you three examples. The first is agri­vol­taics, with semi-trans­pa­rent panels that make it pos­sible to opti­mise the asso­cia­tion bet­ween crops and panels on shades. Here we are dea­ling with fine adjust­ments, as close as pos­sible to the mar­ket, needs and wea­ther condi­tions : com­mer­cial­ly and indus­trial­ly, there is room for dif­fe­ren­tia­ted pro­ducts, sup­por­ted by players capable of pro­vi­ding a service.

The second example is solar ener­gy on vehicles. Today, this is a niche, with a few examples in the plea­sure boat indus­try (the chal­lenge : tur­ning off the engine without tur­ning off the air condi­tio­ning and the fridge). But the rise of elec­tric cars is crea­ting a mas­sive need for solu­tions to cool the vehicle when it is sta­tio­na­ry or, conver­se­ly, to keep the bat­te­ry warm so as not to lose per­for­mance in win­ter. Solar ener­gy is a good can­di­date : manu­fac­tu­rers and equip­ment sup­pliers have pro­jects in the pipeline.

Encou­ra­ged by well thought-out regu­la­tions, indus­trial players will extend the value chain to the last part of the life cycle : recycling.

Third example : solar panels are good for buil­dings, but they are not very ele­gant. A mar­ket for solar tiles is emer­ging, which again will deve­lop accor­ding to more local needs (not all tiles are the same, there are regio­nal dif­fe­rences) and on the basis of aes­the­tic qua­li­ty, from niches that will grow. Here again, there is room for agile and local players. Recent­ly, we have seen the deve­lop­ment of pho­to­vol­taic tiles with a desi­gn very close to that of tra­di­tio­nal tiles

Apart from these niche mar­kets, which are set to expand, can we ima­gine game chan­gers that would change the situa­tion for the Euro­pean industry ? 

Yes, par­ti­cu­lar­ly in the logic of the Euro­pean Green Deal, which com­bines indus­trial poli­cy and eco­lo­gi­cal requi­re­ments. In terms of pho­to­vol­taic panels, Euro­pean stan­dards and regu­la­tions have so far paid lit­tle atten­tion to the life cycle issue. Howe­ver, this will become increa­sin­gly impor­tant. Two points in par­ti­cu­lar could make a dif­fe­rence : the first is the amount of ener­gy consu­med (and CO2 emit­ted) to manu­fac­ture a panel. At present, the “ener­gy return” of panels is not very good : a pho­to­vol­taic module has to run for about two to three years to com­pen­sate for the ener­gy nee­ded to manu­fac­ture it. Moreo­ver, those manu­fac­tu­red in Chi­na have a car­bon foot­print that is not very tra­ceable, and pro­ba­bly not very good. A regu­la­tion empha­si­sing this dimen­sion would change the situation.

In the same spi­rit, ano­ther aspect of the life cycle is like­ly to become more impor­tant : recy­cla­bi­li­ty. This could encou­rage a form of cir­cu­lar eco­no­my, as soon as, encou­ra­ged by well thought-out regu­la­tions, indus­trial players extend the value chain to this last part of the life cycle. Here again, it is at the regio­nal level – that of the EU – that this inte­gra­tion bet­ween indus­try and ser­vices will be most relevant.

Richard Robert

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate