Home / Chroniques / Microchimerism: foreign cells that do us good
AdobeStock_215532160
π Health and biotech

Microchimerism : foreign cells that do us good

Maria Sbeih
Maria Sbeih
Post-doctoral Researcher at Institut Cochin
Avatar
Nathalie Lambert
Research Director at INSERM Autoimmune Arthritis Unit
Key takeaways
  • Microchimeras are cells exchanged between a mother and foetus during pregnancy.
  • This non-self genetic material survives in the bone marrow, leaving the mother with a living record of the pregnancy for over 30 years after giving birth.
  • These cells could play a major role in repairing damaged tissues, such as skin or brain tissue.
  • Thanks to these regenerative properties, microchimerism forms a genetic reservoir with considerable therapeutic potential.
  • Recently, research into microchimeras has accelerated and could transform the world of regenerative medicine.

Cells from other indi­vi­duals can be found in all of us. These micro­che­me­ra, which are exchan­ged during pre­gnan­cy bet­ween a mother and her foe­tus, could play an essen­tial role in pro­tec­ting and repai­ring mater­nal tis­sues. Their pro­per­ties are attrac­ting the inter­est of scien­tists, offe­ring new pos­si­bi­li­ties for inno­va­tive cell the­ra­pies1.

Micro­chi­me­rism is a fas­ci­na­ting phe­no­me­non, but one that is lar­ge­ly unk­nown to the gene­ral public. It is pro­du­ced by a bidi­rec­tio­nal trans­fer of cells bet­ween the foe­tus and the mother during pre­gnan­cy. “This is non-self, which per­sists in our orga­nism in the form of a small quan­ti­ty of cells (…), gene­tic mate­rial that is not ours”, explains Maria Sbeih, who devo­ted her doc­to­ral the­sis to this subject.

The indelible traces of our family ties

These forei­gn cells can be pas­sed on to us by our mothers via the pla­cen­ta (foe­tal micro­chi­me­rism), or exchan­ged in ute­ro with a twin (twin micro­chi­me­rism). Some­times, howe­ver, micro­chi­me­rism can hold sur­prises. There are rare cases where indi­vi­duals car­ry within them the gene­tic imprint of an “eva­nes­cent” twin (who disap­pea­red at the embryo­nic stage), or that of a “phan­tom aunt”, where the mother trans­mits to her child cells that her own eva­nes­cent twin had bequea­thed to her decades earlier.

Never­the­less, these very spe­cial cases should not obs­cure the gene­ral rule of micro­chi­me­rism, which is that mothers pass on mater­nal cells to their foe­tuses and, conver­se­ly, each mother retains a living memo­ry of her pre­gnan­cy. Foe­tal micro­chi­me­rism is “detec­table in the mother’s body for more than 30 years after child­birth”, explains Maria Sbeih. In order to sur­vive for such a long time, the micro­chi­me­ric cells nestle in a microen­vi­ron­ment that is condu­cive to stem cells, such as the mother’s bone marrow.

Micro­chi­me­rism also plays a key role in “the tole­rance of the foe­tus in the mother’s body”, explains Natha­lie Lam­bert, direc­tor of the INSERM Autoim­mune Arthri­tis Unit in Mar­seille. In fact, when they cross the pla­cen­tal bar­rier, foe­tal cells go to the thy­mus, an organ that the resear­cher des­cribes as “the school of tole­rance”. This mecha­nism enables the mother’s body “to learn to accept the child she is car­rying, without rejec­ting it”, conti­nues the resear­cher. And, conver­se­ly, the foe­tus receives mater­nal cells that enable it to tole­rate the host (the mother).

Functions that remain a mystery

While recent stu­dies des­cribe the posi­tive and coope­ra­tive func­tions of micro­chi­me­ras for the body and tis­sue rege­ne­ra­tion, this has not always been the case. For a long time, these cells were consi­de­red to be poten­tial agents of autoim­mune diseases. Natha­lie Lam­bert, who was trai­ned and edu­ca­ted in micro­chi­me­rism by Lee Nel­son, a pio­neer in the field in the Uni­ted States, remem­bers taking part in the first stu­dies lin­king micro­chi­me­rism to autoim­mune diseases such as scle­ro­der­ma. “We assu­med that these forei­gn cells were atta­cking the mother’s immune cells, pro­vo­king a graft-ver­sus-host reac­tion”, she recalls.

In the wake of this work, nume­rous stu­dies have sought to esta­blish a link bet­ween the pre­sence of micro­chi­me­ras and autoim­mune diseases in women. But in science, a cor­re­la­tion does not neces­sa­ri­ly imply cau­sa­tion. “Just because you find fire­men at the site of a fire doesn’t mean they star­ted it”, says the resear­cher, using the meta­phor of jour­na­list Lise Bar­néoud, who has writ­ten a book2 on the sub­ject. In other words, micro­che­me­ra are not neces­sa­ri­ly res­pon­sible for the inflam­ma­tion of the tis­sue they are direc­ted at. It also remai­ned to be pro­ven that, des­pite their rari­ty, these few cells could have quan­ti­fiable immu­no­lo­gi­cal func­tions. This is what the resear­cher is in the pro­cess of demons­tra­ting in mouse models, where these micro­che­mi­cal cells are capable of pro­du­cing autoan­ti­bo­dies spe­ci­fic to rheu­ma­toid arthri­tis (an autoim­mune and dege­ne­ra­tive disease that leads to chro­nic inflam­ma­tion of the joints).

“It took us many years to break out of this para­digm”, stresses Natha­lie Lam­bert, who believes that scien­ti­fic research is final­ly giving micro­chi­me­rism the atten­tion it deserves. This is the case of the “Cuta­neous Bio­lo­gy” team (Ins­ti­tut Cochin, INSERM-CNRS, Uni­ver­si­té Paris Cité) to which Maria Sbeih was atta­ched during her the­sis. Scien­tists have recent­ly demons­tra­ted3 that micro­che­mi­cals can have high­ly bene­fi­cial effects on the mother’s health, by hel­ping to repair dama­ged tis­sues (inclu­ding the skin). “We obser­ved the acti­vi­ty of micro­chi­me­ric cells migra­ting towards dama­ged areas, or skin wounds in the case of our team”, explains the bio­lo­gist. The results were clear : micro­chi­me­ras are invol­ved in tis­sue repair, “either by secre­ting pro-hea­ling mole­cules or by adop­ting the phe­no­type of the cells in the dama­ged tissue”.

Exploiting microchimerism for therapeutic purposes

Micro­chi­me­rism forms a small the­ra­peu­tic gene­tic reser­voir with which we are all endo­wed. A series of medi­cine cabi­nets, made up of the genes of our chil­dren, our mothers, our grand­mo­thers and our older bro­thers and sis­ters, which have yet to reveal all their secrets. The medium-term ambi­tion of scien­tists is the­re­fore to find ways of exploi­ting these micro­che­mi­cal cells for the­ra­peu­tic purposes.

The pace of research has acce­le­ra­ted in recent years. Natha­lie Lam­bert and her team ana­ly­sed the blood of 92 pre­gnant women for the first time. They were able to deter­mine the “HLA typing” of three gene­ra­tions : the pre­gnant woman, her mother and her child. Using cut­ting-edge tech­niques, they were able to iden­ti­fy the pre­sence of mater­nal and grand-mater­nal cells in the cord blood. The team is cur­rent­ly wor­king on the publi­ca­tion of an article sho­wing a form of homeo­sta­sis (regu­la­tion, balance) bet­ween the dif­ferent micro­che­mi­cal sources. “We dis­co­ve­red that pre­gnant women with a high mater­nal micro­chi­me­rism (grand­mo­ther) at the start of pre­gnan­cy had less micro­chi­me­rism in their foe­tus during this per­iod, sug­ges­ting pos­sible com­pe­ti­tion bet­ween micro­chi­me­ras to balance the ove­rall quan­ti­ty”, explains the resear­cher from Marseilles.

From a cere­bral point of view, it has also been shown that foe­tal micro­chi­me­rism can play a role in the repair of cere­bral lesions. Maria Sbeih reports “having obser­ved4 real dif­fe­rences bet­ween mul­ti­pa­rous (having had at least one pre­gnan­cy) and nul­li­pa­rous (the oppo­site) ani­mal models in terms of their abi­li­ty to repair neu­ro­nal lesions”. Other stu­dies tend to show5 that post-stroke reco­ve­ry is more effec­tive in mul­ti­pa­rous ani­mal models, “with bet­ter revas­cu­la­ri­sa­tion of the dama­ged area”. While much remains to be dis­co­ve­red about the pre­cise pro­per­ties of micro­chi­me­ric cells, the simple fact of having this the­ra­peu­tic poten­tial within us could make it pos­sible “to bypass many of the tech­ni­cal com­plexi­ties asso­cia­ted with cur­rent cell the­ra­pies”, Maria Sbeih is deligh­ted to report, “such as having to har­vest stem cells, puri­fy them, ampli­fy them, reim­plant them, etc.”.

Dis­creet as they may be, micro­chi­me­ras could soon be making a big splash in the world of rege­ne­ra­tive medicine.

Samuel Belaud
1https://​inria​.hal​.science/​t​e​l​-​0​3​7​3​5448/
2http://​www​.pre​mier​pa​ral​lele​.fr/​l​i​v​r​e​/​l​e​s​-​c​e​l​l​u​l​e​s​-​b​u​i​s​s​o​n​n​ieres
3https://​pub​med​.ncbi​.nlm​.nih​.gov/​3​6​3​7​3248/
4 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969996122002844?via%3Dihub
5 https://​www​.pnas​.org/​d​o​i​/​f​u​l​l​/​1​0​.​1​0​7​3​/​p​n​a​s​.​1​6​0​7​0​02114

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate