Home / Chroniques / Three possible ways of turning back the clocks of ageing
Andrew Steele
π Health and biotech

Three possible ways of turning back the clocks of ageing

Andrew Steele
Andrew Steele
PhD in physics from the University of Oxford, Science Writer and Columnist at Polytechnique Insights
Key takeaways
  • Scientists now understand better than ever the fundamental biology of what causes us to grow old and, most excitingly, how we can slow down or even reverse these biological changes.
  • The study of telomerase a major aspect of the ageing research around ageing. An idea is to extend telomeres to revert cells to a more youthful form.
  • Another theory is to remove “senescent” cells (responsible for ageing) so that we may live longer and younger.
  • Finally, a solution could be cellular reprogramming, which consists of taking any cell from our body and converting it into a “pluripotent cell” to replace damaged ones.

Many of us think of the age­ing pro­cess as a fact of life. As humans, our risk of death rises by 10% each year thanks to the ever-tick­ing bio­lo­gic­al clock of the age­ing pro­cess. Older people are more likely to suf­fer from dis­eases like can­cer and demen­tia, more likely to be frail, lose their sight, hear­ing or memory, and much more besides.

How­ever, this pro­cess may not be so depress­ingly inev­it­able as we usu­ally ima­gine. Sci­ent­ists now under­stand bet­ter than ever the fun­da­ment­al bio­logy of what causes us to grow old1 and, most excit­ingly, how we can slow down or even reverse these bio­lo­gic­al changes.

Here are three ideas to watch which could one day soon be turn­ing back your bio­lo­gic­al clock.

1. Telomerase: revitalising our DNA

One of the best known areas of age­ing research is study­ing ‘telomeres’: pro­tect­ive caps which ensure the integ­rity of the ends of our DNA. How­ever, many cells in our bod­ies are con­stantly divid­ing: tis­sues like our skin, our blood and the lin­ing of our guts need to be con­stantly replaced due to wear and tear, and freshly divided new cells replace the old-timers. And unfor­tu­nately, cel­lu­lar divi­sion comes at a cost to our telomeres: they get short­er every time a cell divides.

The longer you live, the more times your cells will have divided, and the short­er your telomeres will be on aver­age. And meas­ur­ing telomere length isn’t just a round­about way of determ­in­ing how old you are—telomeres seem to have a caus­al role in age­ing too. Short­er telomeres make age-related dis­eases more likely, and slightly mor­bid stud­ies of identic­al twins have found that the one with short­er telomeres is likely to die soon­er.2

Sci­ent­ists in the 1990s were thus very excited by telomerase: an enzyme which can extend telomeres and, per­haps, make cells more youth­ful at the same time. Unfor­tu­nately, its ten­ure as the immor­tal­ity enzyme didn’t last long: exper­i­ments in mice showed that telomerase did indeed give their cells the poten­tial to divide far more times—at the cost of massively increas­ing the risk of the deadly dis­ease for whom excess­ive cell divi­sion is its mod­us operandi: can­cer3.

Luck­ily, not all research­ers aban­doned telomerase as a poten­tial ther­apy. In the last ten or fif­teen years, sci­ent­ists have shown that it can extend the lives of mice if coupled with meas­ures to reduce the risk of can­cer, or if used inter­mit­tently rather than activ­ated con­tinu­ously as it was in early experiments.

The next step will be to try some of these ideas in humans4.

2. Senolytic treatments: killing aged cells

As we grow grey and wrinkled on the out­side, so too the cells that make up our insides grow old. As we age, some of our cells become ‘sen­es­cent’ — the sci­entif­ic word for aged — and, in doing so, they can accel­er­ate the age­ing of the rest of our body too. We now under­stand that sen­es­cent cells aren’t just benign bystand­ers in the age­ing pro­cess, the cel­lu­lar equi­val­ent of candles on a birth­day cake, but emit a tox­ic cock­tail of molecules which can increase the risk of heart dis­ease, can­cer, cog­nit­ive decline, and much more besides.

The good news is, it might not have to be this way. Sci­ent­ists have come up with a num­ber of dif­fer­ent ways to kill these cells, while leav­ing the rest of the cells in the body intact. The idea fur­thest along in devel­op­ment is ‘senolyt­ic’ drugs, the first of which were dis­covered in 20155, and sev­er­al of which are already in human clin­ic­al trials.

A 2018 study6 showed the wide-ran­ging effects of giv­ing senolyt­ics to old mice: the anim­als lived longer, which is a good start, but they also lived young­er, with less chance of dis­ease, less frailty (meas­ured by per­form­ance on tiny mouse-sized gym equip­ment, from tread­mills, to tightropes, to wires to hang from), improved cog­ni­tion, and even bet­ter fur! This sug­gests that sen­es­cent cells aren’t just respons­ible for a single aspect of age­ing, but have effects on many or even all of its facets—meaning that remov­ing them could have wide­spread pre­vent­at­ive medi­cines for many dif­fer­ent diseases.

There are cur­rently over two dozen com­pan­ies aim­ing to com­mer­cial­ise senolyt­ic treat­ments7, from drugs, to chem­ic­als called pep­tides, to encour­aging our immune sys­tems to clear up these aber­rant cells. This diversity means we’ve got a lot of options in case some approaches don’t work out—and means that senolyt­ics are a strong con­tender for our first true anti-age­ing treatment.

3. Cellular reprogramming: turning back the biological clock

Its name makes it sound like sci­ence fic­tion — and, once you hear what it actu­ally entails, it only sounds moreso — but cel­lu­lar repro­gram­ming is prob­ably the hot­test idea in age­ing bio­logy right now, with enorm­ous poten­tial to improve our health. The ques­tion is, do we know enough to get it from sci­ence fact in the lab, to work­able med­ic­al tech­no­logy in the real world?

The tech­nique was first dis­covered in the mid-2000s8, when Japan­ese sci­ent­ist Shinya Yaman­a­ka was try­ing to work out what enables cells in the embryo to grow up into any kind of cell in the body, from heart, to skin, to brain. He found that a com­bin­a­tion of just four genes, now known as the ‘Yaman­a­ka factors’, was enough to revert any cell in the body to this ‘pluri­po­tent’ state, mean­ing that they could turn into any type of adult cell. I could take a skin cell from your arm, use these genes to turn it into a pluri­po­tent stem cell, and then ‘dif­fer­en­ti­ate’ that stem cell into any kind of cell I liked.

Yaman­a­ka received the Nobel Prize in 2012 for this dis­cov­ery, and it was around this time that we real­ised quite how extens­ively this pro­cess of indu­cing pluri­po­tency turns back the clock in cells. Not only does it wind back the devel­op­ment­al clock, revert­ing the cell to a pluri­po­tent state, but it also seems to reduce the bio­lo­gic­al age of the cells, mak­ing them young­er and health­i­er in a num­ber of dif­fer­ent ways.

Turn­ing all our cells into stem cells would be a ter­rible idea — I’m quite fond of my brain cells being brain cells, thanks very much — but the good news is, if you activ­ate the Yaman­a­ka factors inter­mit­tently rather than con­tinu­ously, a cell can shed a few years of bio­lo­gic­al age without turn­ing into a dif­fer­ent kind of cell9. Doing exactly this has been shown to improve the health of mice with a dis­ease that causes them to age pre­ma­turely, and regen­er­ate tis­sues in adult mice that would nor­mally only heal prop­erly before birth, not in an adult mouse.

The prom­ise of this approach made head­lines when bil­lion­aires includ­ing Amazon founder Jeff Bezos cre­ated a $3bn star­tup called Altos Labs10 and recruited a num­ber of the top sci­ent­ists work­ing on repro­gram­ming, includ­ing Yaman­a­ka, to work on turn­ing this idea from great news for mice, to great news for people. The ques­tion is wheth­er we can move this from a phe­nomen­on observed in genet­ic­ally mod­i­fied mice in the lab to us unmod­i­fied humans walk­ing around in the wild—and $3bn may just be enough to find out.

1C. López-Otín, M. A. Blasco, L. Part­ridge, M. Ser­rano, G. Kroe­mer, The hall­marks of aging. Cell. 153, 1194–1217 (2013)
2M. Kimura et al., Telomere length and mor­tal­ity: a study of leuk­o­cytes in eld­erly Dan­ish twins. Am. J. Epi­demi­ol. 167, 799–806 (2008)
3S. E. Artandi et al., Con­stitutive telomerase expres­sion pro­motes mam­mary car­cino­mas in aging mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 8191–8196 (2002)
4Research­ers cure lung fibrosis in mice with a single gene ther­apy – Lifespan​.io
5Y. Zhu, et al., The Achilles’ heel of sen­es­cent cells: from tran­scrip­tome to senolyt­ic drugs. Aging Cell 14, 644–658 (2015)
6M. Xu, et al., Senolyt­ics improve phys­ic­al func­tion and increase lifespan in old age. Nat. Med. (2018) DOI:10.1038/s41591-018‑0092‑9.
7E. Dol­gin, Send in the senolyt­ics. Nat. Bio­tech­n­ol. (2020) DOI:10.1038/s41587-020–00750‑1
8K. Taka­hashi, S. Yaman­a­ka, Induc­tion of pluri­po­tent stem cells from mouse embryon­ic and adult fibro­blast cul­tures by defined factors. Cell. 126, 663–676 (2006).
9A. Ocampo et al., In Vivo Ameli­or­a­tion of Age-Asso­ci­ated Hall­marks by Par­tial Repro­gram­ming, Cell 167, 1719–1733.e12 (2016)
10Meet Altos Labs, Sil­ic­on Valley’s latest wild bet on liv­ing forever – Tech­no­logy review

Contributors

Andrew Steele

Andrew Steele

PhD in physics from the University of Oxford, Science Writer and Columnist at Polytechnique Insights

After a PhD in physics from the University of Oxford, Andrew Steele decided that ageing was the single most important scientific challenge of our time, and switched fields to computational biology. After five years using machine learning to investigate DNA and NHS medical records, he is now a full-time writer, author of Ageless: The new science of getting older without getting old, presenter and campaigner.

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate