Home / Chroniques / Three possible ways of turning back the clocks of ageing
Andrew Steele
π Health and biotech

Three possible ways of turning back the clocks of ageing

Andrew Steele
Andrew Steele
PhD in physics from the University of Oxford, Science Writer and Columnist at Polytechnique Insights
Key takeaways
  • Scientists now understand better than ever the fundamental biology of what causes us to grow old and, most excitingly, how we can slow down or even reverse these biological changes.
  • The study of telomerase a major aspect of the ageing research around ageing. An idea is to extend telomeres to revert cells to a more youthful form.
  • Another theory is to remove “senescent” cells (responsible for ageing) so that we may live longer and younger.
  • Finally, a solution could be cellular reprogramming, which consists of taking any cell from our body and converting it into a “pluripotent cell” to replace damaged ones.

Many of us think of the ageing pro­cess as a fact of life. As humans, our risk of death rises by 10% each year thanks to the ever-ticking bio­lo­gi­cal clock of the ageing pro­cess. Older people are more like­ly to suf­fer from diseases like can­cer and demen­tia, more like­ly to be frail, lose their sight, hea­ring or memo­ry, and much more besides.

Howe­ver, this pro­cess may not be so depres­sin­gly inevi­table as we usual­ly ima­gine. Scien­tists now unders­tand bet­ter than ever the fun­da­men­tal bio­lo­gy of what causes us to grow old1 and, most exci­tin­gly, how we can slow down or even reverse these bio­lo­gi­cal changes.

Here are three ideas to watch which could one day soon be tur­ning back your bio­lo­gi­cal clock.

1. Telomerase : revitalising our DNA

One of the best known areas of ageing research is stu­dying ‘telo­meres’: pro­tec­tive caps which ensure the inte­gri­ty of the ends of our DNA. Howe­ver, many cells in our bodies are constant­ly divi­ding : tis­sues like our skin, our blood and the lining of our guts need to be constant­ly repla­ced due to wear and tear, and fre­sh­ly divi­ded new cells replace the old-timers. And unfor­tu­na­te­ly, cel­lu­lar divi­sion comes at a cost to our telo­meres : they get shor­ter eve­ry time a cell divides.

The lon­ger you live, the more times your cells will have divi­ded, and the shor­ter your telo­meres will be on ave­rage. And mea­su­ring telo­mere length isn’t just a roun­da­bout way of deter­mi­ning how old you are—telomeres seem to have a cau­sal role in ageing too. Shor­ter telo­meres make age-rela­ted diseases more like­ly, and slight­ly mor­bid stu­dies of iden­ti­cal twins have found that the one with shor­ter telo­meres is like­ly to die soo­ner.2

Scien­tists in the 1990s were thus very exci­ted by telo­me­rase : an enzyme which can extend telo­meres and, per­haps, make cells more you­th­ful at the same time. Unfor­tu­na­te­ly, its tenure as the immor­ta­li­ty enzyme didn’t last long : expe­ri­ments in mice sho­wed that telo­me­rase did indeed give their cells the poten­tial to divide far more times—at the cost of mas­si­ve­ly increa­sing the risk of the dead­ly disease for whom exces­sive cell divi­sion is its modus ope­ran­di : can­cer3.

Lucki­ly, not all resear­chers aban­do­ned telo­me­rase as a poten­tial the­ra­py. In the last ten or fif­teen years, scien­tists have shown that it can extend the lives of mice if cou­pled with mea­sures to reduce the risk of can­cer, or if used inter­mit­tent­ly rather than acti­va­ted conti­nuous­ly as it was in ear­ly experiments.

The next step will be to try some of these ideas in humans4.

2. Senolytic treatments : killing aged cells

As we grow grey and wrink­led on the out­side, so too the cells that make up our insides grow old. As we age, some of our cells become ‘senes­cent’ — the scien­ti­fic word for aged — and, in doing so, they can acce­le­rate the ageing of the rest of our body too. We now unders­tand that senes­cent cells aren’t just beni­gn bys­tan­ders in the ageing pro­cess, the cel­lu­lar equi­va­lent of candles on a bir­th­day cake, but emit a toxic cock­tail of mole­cules which can increase the risk of heart disease, can­cer, cog­ni­tive decline, and much more besides.

The good news is, it might not have to be this way. Scien­tists have come up with a num­ber of dif­ferent ways to kill these cells, while lea­ving the rest of the cells in the body intact. The idea fur­thest along in deve­lop­ment is ‘seno­ly­tic’ drugs, the first of which were dis­co­ve­red in 20155, and seve­ral of which are alrea­dy in human cli­ni­cal trials.

A 2018 stu­dy6 sho­wed the wide-ran­ging effects of giving seno­ly­tics to old mice : the ani­mals lived lon­ger, which is a good start, but they also lived youn­ger, with less chance of disease, less frail­ty (mea­su­red by per­for­mance on tiny mouse-sized gym equip­ment, from tread­mil­ls, to tigh­tropes, to wires to hang from), impro­ved cog­ni­tion, and even bet­ter fur ! This sug­gests that senes­cent cells aren’t just res­pon­sible for a single aspect of ageing, but have effects on many or even all of its facets—meaning that remo­ving them could have wides­pread pre­ven­ta­tive medi­cines for many dif­ferent diseases.

There are cur­rent­ly over two dozen com­pa­nies aiming to com­mer­cia­lise seno­ly­tic treat­ments7, from drugs, to che­mi­cals cal­led pep­tides, to encou­ra­ging our immune sys­tems to clear up these aber­rant cells. This diver­si­ty means we’ve got a lot of options in case some approaches don’t work out—and means that seno­ly­tics are a strong conten­der for our first true anti-ageing treatment.

3. Cellular reprogramming : turning back the biological clock

Its name makes it sound like science fic­tion — and, once you hear what it actual­ly entails, it only sounds more­so — but cel­lu­lar repro­gram­ming is pro­ba­bly the hot­test idea in ageing bio­lo­gy right now, with enor­mous poten­tial to improve our health. The ques­tion is, do we know enough to get it from science fact in the lab, to wor­kable medi­cal tech­no­lo­gy in the real world ?

The tech­nique was first dis­co­ve­red in the mid-2000s8, when Japa­nese scien­tist Shi­nya Yama­na­ka was trying to work out what enables cells in the embryo to grow up into any kind of cell in the body, from heart, to skin, to brain. He found that a com­bi­na­tion of just four genes, now known as the ‘Yama­na­ka fac­tors’, was enough to revert any cell in the body to this ‘plu­ri­potent’ state, mea­ning that they could turn into any type of adult cell. I could take a skin cell from your arm, use these genes to turn it into a plu­ri­potent stem cell, and then ‘dif­fe­ren­tiate’ that stem cell into any kind of cell I liked.

Yama­na­ka recei­ved the Nobel Prize in 2012 for this dis­co­ve­ry, and it was around this time that we rea­li­sed quite how exten­si­ve­ly this pro­cess of indu­cing plu­ri­po­ten­cy turns back the clock in cells. Not only does it wind back the deve­lop­men­tal clock, rever­ting the cell to a plu­ri­potent state, but it also seems to reduce the bio­lo­gi­cal age of the cells, making them youn­ger and heal­thier in a num­ber of dif­ferent ways.

Tur­ning all our cells into stem cells would be a ter­rible idea — I’m quite fond of my brain cells being brain cells, thanks very much — but the good news is, if you acti­vate the Yama­na­ka fac­tors inter­mit­tent­ly rather than conti­nuous­ly, a cell can shed a few years of bio­lo­gi­cal age without tur­ning into a dif­ferent kind of cell9. Doing exact­ly this has been shown to improve the health of mice with a disease that causes them to age pre­ma­tu­re­ly, and rege­ne­rate tis­sues in adult mice that would nor­mal­ly only heal pro­per­ly before birth, not in an adult mouse.

The pro­mise of this approach made head­lines when bil­lio­naires inclu­ding Ama­zon foun­der Jeff Bezos crea­ted a $3bn star­tup cal­led Altos Labs10 and recrui­ted a num­ber of the top scien­tists wor­king on repro­gram­ming, inclu­ding Yama­na­ka, to work on tur­ning this idea from great news for mice, to great news for people. The ques­tion is whe­ther we can move this from a phe­no­me­non obser­ved in gene­ti­cal­ly modi­fied mice in the lab to us unmo­di­fied humans wal­king around in the wild—and $3bn may just be enough to find out.

1C. López-Otín, M. A. Blas­co, L. Par­tridge, M. Ser­ra­no, G. Kroe­mer, The hall­marks of aging. Cell. 153, 1194–1217 (2013)
2M. Kimu­ra et al., Telo­mere length and mor­ta­li­ty : a stu­dy of leu­ko­cytes in elder­ly Danish twins. Am. J. Epi­de­miol. 167, 799–806 (2008)
3S. E. Artan­di et al., Consti­tu­tive telo­me­rase expres­sion pro­motes mam­ma­ry car­ci­no­mas in aging mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 8191–8196 (2002)
4Resear­chers cure lung fibro­sis in mice with a single gene the­ra­py – Lifes​pan​.io
5Y. Zhu, et al., The Achilles’ heel of senes­cent cells : from trans­crip­tome to seno­ly­tic drugs. Aging Cell 14, 644–658 (2015)
6M. Xu, et al., Seno­ly­tics improve phy­si­cal func­tion and increase lifes­pan in old age. Nat. Med. (2018) DOI:10.1038/s41591-018‑0092‑9.
7E. Dol­gin, Send in the seno­ly­tics. Nat. Bio­tech­nol. (2020) DOI:10.1038/s41587-020–00750‑1
8K. Taka­ha­shi, S. Yama­na­ka, Induc­tion of plu­ri­potent stem cells from mouse embryo­nic and adult fibro­blast cultures by defi­ned fac­tors. Cell. 126, 663–676 (2006).
9A. Ocam­po et al., In Vivo Ame­lio­ra­tion of Age-Asso­cia­ted Hall­marks by Par­tial Repro­gram­ming, Cell 167, 1719–1733.e12 (2016)
10Meet Altos Labs, Sili­con Valley’s latest wild bet on living fore­ver – Tech­no­lo­gy review

Contributors

Andrew Steele

Andrew Steele

PhD in physics from the University of Oxford, Science Writer and Columnist at Polytechnique Insights

After a PhD in physics from the University of Oxford, Andrew Steele decided that ageing was the single most important scientific challenge of our time, and switched fields to computational biology. After five years using machine learning to investigate DNA and NHS medical records, he is now a full-time writer, author of Ageless: The new science of getting older without getting old, presenter and campaigner.

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate