Home / Chroniques / Satellites are detecting plastic pollution in the ocean worldwide
Généré par l'IA / Generated using AI
π Planet

Satellites are detecting plastic pollution in the ocean worldwide

Jérôme Benveniste_vf
Jérôme Benveniste
Chair of the COSPAR Scientific Committee on Space Studies of the Earth's Surface, Meteorology and Climate, formerly Senior Adviser at ESA
Audrey Hasson_VF
Audrey Hasson
Doctor of Physical Oceanography and Executive Director of the GEO Blue Planet Initiative
François Galgani
Senior Scientist at Ifremer, Specialist in the Marine Environment and Pollution
Key takeaways
  • Between 1950 and 2017, approximately 9.2 billion tonnes of plastic were produced and 7 billion tonnes became waste.
  • In 2021, the total amount accumulated in the oceans was estimated to between 75 and 199 million tonnes of plastic, which represents more than 80% of the debris present in aquatic systems.
  • Scientists use three techniques to quantify plastic debris and its movements: numerical models, in situ measurements and satellite monitoring.
  • Depending on the resolution of the device, satellites can detect plastic clusters with a minimum surface area of 5 m2.
  • The “plastics index” is a new indicator based on an object’s reflection in light, which makes it possible to extract the spectral signature of the plastic.

The harm­ful effects of plas­tic pol­lu­tion on human health and bio­di­ver­si­ty are well docu­men­ted. Howe­ver, last sum­mer, the nego­tia­ting com­mit­tee mee­ting in Gene­va once again fai­led to reach an inter­na­tio­nal trea­ty against plas­tic pol­lu­tion. This pol­lu­tion is accu­mu­la­ting in the oceans : 75 to 199 mil­lion tonnes of plas­tic are thought to have ended up in the oceans in 20211, and annual discharges now amount to tens of mil­lions of tonnes. Plas­tic accounts for more than 80% of the debris present in aqua­tic sys­tems2. “There is cur­rent­ly no glo­bal assess­ment of pol­lu­tion in the sea,” laments Audrey Has­son, ocea­no­gra­pher and coor­di­na­tor of the GEO Blue Pla­net Ini­tia­tive. Yet this would enable reduc­tion tar­gets to be set and the effec­ti­ve­ness of pre­ven­tion poli­cies to be moni­to­red.” For seve­ral years now, scien­tists have been trying to use satel­lites for this purpose.

Bet­ween 1950 and 2017, approxi­ma­te­ly 9.2 bil­lion tonnes of plas­tic were pro­du­ced. Of this volume, 7 bil­lion tonnes became waste. This waste is sent to land­fill, enters uncon­trol­led waste streams or is dum­ped in the envi­ron­ment. Most of the plas­tic waste in the oceans comes from land-based sources. Once at sea, it is car­ried by the cur­rents3. “Without a glo­bal view, it is very dif­fi­cult to find solu­tions to the pro­blem of plas­tic pol­lu­tion,” com­ments Fran­çois Gal­ga­ni. “Howe­ver, the tools avai­lable to pro­vide this glo­bal view are very limi­ted, and satel­lite mea­su­re­ments are one of the few that can do so.”

Satellite observation

Scien­tists use three main tech­niques to quan­ti­fy plas­tic debris and its move­ments4 : nume­ri­cal models, in situ mea­su­re­ments (at sea on board a ship, for example) and satel­lite moni­to­ring. The use of satel­lite data to stu­dy plas­tic pol­lu­tion is a recent deve­lop­ment, dating back to the 2010s, and two major stu­dies were publi­shed in 2020 56. In the same year, the Euro­pean Space Agen­cy sup­por­ted a cam­pai­gn7 dedi­ca­ted to mea­su­ring marine debris from space for the first time.

In prac­tice, the data used consists of high-reso­lu­tion images in the visible spec­trum, as well as infra­red and radar images. “There is no dedi­ca­ted satel­lite mis­sion, so we use data from the Sen­ti­nel 1, 2 and 3 Earth obser­va­tion satel­lites,” explains Audrey Has­son. Stu­dies show that it is pos­sible to detect plas­tic clus­ters with a mini­mum sur­face area of 5 m2 using Sentinel‑2. “We can only detect large pieces of plas­tic ; the reso­lu­tion of the detec­tion depends on the reso­lu­tion of the ins­tru­ment used,” adds Audrey Has­son. It is the­re­fore impos­sible to detect indi­vi­dual pieces of plas­tic, only clus­ters of debris.

Howe­ver, the chal­lenge of detec­ting plas­tic by satel­lite is that it is neces­sa­ry to ascer­tain the nature of the object obser­ved. How can plas­tic be dis­tin­gui­shed from algae, drift­wood or foam ? A publi­ca­tion in Nature has suc­cee­ded for the first time in deve­lo­ping an indi­ca­tor : the plas­tics index. Depen­ding on its nature, each object reflects light dif­fe­rent­ly, a pro­per­ty that can be obser­ved in its spec­tral signa­ture. Scien­tists have thus cha­rac­te­ri­sed the spec­tral signa­ture of plas­tic to dis­tin­guish it from other mate­rials in Sen­ti­nel images. “Plas­tics mix with foam or vege­ta­tion, so dif­fe­ren­tia­tion remains very com­pli­ca­ted,” cau­tions Audrey Has­son. Fran­çois Gal­ga­ni, an ocea­no­gra­phy resear­cher at Ifre­mer, adds : “Today, some detec­tion methods are quite reliable, such as in the case of contai­ner losses. We also expect to be able to locate aban­do­ned fibre­glass boats, which represent a reser­voir of 500,000 to one mil­lion tonnes of plastic.”

Mapping hotspots

To date, space-based detec­tion of plas­tic pol­lu­tion remains at the R&D stage and no ope­ra­tio­nal appli­ca­tions exist. In a recent stu­dy 8[3], scien­tists show that space-based detec­tion is not wide­ly favou­red by the scien­ti­fic com­mu­ni­ty : among the 46 scien­tists sur­veyed, field obser­va­tions and drone mea­su­re­ment cam­pai­gns are the most com­mon­ly used tech­niques, ahead of satel­lite ima­ge­ry and GPS tracking.

To over­come cur­rent tech­no­lo­gi­cal limi­ta­tions, an inter­na­tio­nal team has deve­lo­ped a new ana­ly­sis method. Their goal : to bypass the dif­fi­cult step of iden­ti­fying the nature of the debris. Scien­tists show that cer­tain types of floa­ting waste clus­ters (regard­less of their nature) that are reco­gni­sable by their shape are indi­ca­tors of recent pol­lu­tion inci­dents 9[4]. The team states : “Des­pite the limi­ta­tions of space tech­no­lo­gy, satel­lite detec­tions are suf­fi­cient to map hots­pots and cap­ture trends, pro­vi­ding an unpre­ce­den­ted view of marine debris from its source to its final des­ti­na­tion.” This data is inva­luable for bet­ter anti­ci­pa­ting pol­lu­tion peaks and thus limi­ting them.

Ano­ther ave­nue : laun­ching dedi­ca­ted satel­lite mis­sions. “We hope to launch the first nano­sa­tel­lite from the Des­de­mone uni­ver­si­ty pro­gramme within three years,” says Jérôme Ben­ve­niste, Pre­sident of the Com­mit­tee on Space Research (COSPAR) and for­mer senior expert in ocea­no­gra­phy and hydro­lo­gy at the Euro­pean Space Agen­cy. Thanks to this nano­sa­tel­lite moni­to­ring sys­tem, the pro­gramme aims to mea­sure the concen­tra­tions and flows of macro-plas­tic waste in the Medi­ter­ra­nean in order to moni­tor, anti­ci­pate and act in near real time, while pro­vi­ding trai­ning in space-rela­ted pro­fes­sions10. Ano­ther ave­nue is being explo­red : detec­ting micro­plas­tics by satellite.

“Once the debris degrades, it becomes micro­plas­tic and is unde­tec­table by satel­lite,” explains Jérôme Ben­ve­niste. “One of the Euro­pean Space Agen­cy’s pro­grammes aims to test whe­ther the spec­tral signa­ture of sea­wa­ter changes in regions with high levels of microplastics.”

Anaïs Maréchal
1https://​imdos​.org/​m​a​r​i​n​e​-​d​ebris
2https://​wedocs​.unep​.org/​i​t​e​m​s​/​5​5​e​f​1​0​6​c​-​e​0​6​5​-​4​7​0​9​-​a​5​d​5​-​4​2​9​d​c​4​5​57762
3https://​ocean​brief​.eu4o​cea​nobs​.eu/​u​s​e​-​c​a​s​e​s​/​m​a​r​i​n​e​-​l​i​t​t​e​r​/​e​x​pert/
4https://​marine​.coper​ni​cus​.eu/​f​r​/​s​e​r​v​i​c​e​s​/​p​o​l​l​u​t​i​o​n​-​p​l​a​s​t​i​q​u​e​/​d​e​t​e​c​t​i​o​n​-​p​o​l​l​u​t​i​o​n​-​p​l​a​s​tique
5https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020–62298‑z
6https://www.mdpi.com/2072–4292/12/12/2013 utm_source=researchgate.net&medium=article
7https://​earth​.esa​.int/​e​o​g​a​t​e​w​a​y​/​s​u​c​c​e​s​s​-​s​t​o​r​y​/​t​p​m​-​d​a​t​a​-​h​e​l​p​-​a​d​v​a​n​c​e​-​p​l​a​s​t​i​c​-​l​i​t​t​e​r​-​d​e​t​e​c​t​i​o​n​-​f​r​o​m​-​space
8https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969724066841?via%3Dihub
9https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024–48674‑7
10https://​fon​da​tion​va​nal​len​.edu​.umont​pel​lier​.fr/​f​i​l​e​s​/​2​0​2​5​/​0​8​/​2​5​0​3​2​0​_​p​l​a​q​u​e​t​t​e​-​d​e​s​d​e​m​o​n​e​_​v​1​4.pdf

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate