3_santeBiomimetisme
π Science and technology π Health and biotech π Planet
Biomimicry: when science draws inspiration from nature

When regenerative medicine imitates nature

with Catherine Picart, Director of the Biosanté joint research unit (INSERM, CEA, Univ. Grenoble Alpes), and head of the "Biomimetics and Regenerative Medicine" team (BRM)
On October 25th, 2023 |
3 min reading time
Catherine Picart
Catherine Picart
Director of the Biosanté joint research unit (INSERM, CEA, Univ. Grenoble Alpes), and head of the "Biomimetics and Regenerative Medicine" team (BRM)
Key takeaways
  • Biomimicry makes it possible to create new tools for medicine, particularly surgical procedures.
  • Restorative medicine is on the way to becoming regenerative, i.e. being able to restore biological tissues and their functions.
  • This biomimetic approach uses bioengineering to create biomaterials for bone repair: “osteo-inducers”.
  • By understanding the molecular mechanisms involved in the formation of bone tissue, this technique will make it possible to regenerate tailor-made bones.

Bio­mi­mi­cry is beco­ming increa­sin­gly popu­lar in bio­me­di­cal research. It per­meates both fun­da­men­tal bio­lo­gi­cal research and the deve­lop­ment of medi­cal tech­no­lo­gy. Here are a few examples.

A new tur­ning point for res­to­ra­tive medi­cine, which is on the way to beco­ming rege­ne­ra­tive, i.e. tru­ly capable of res­to­ring bio­lo­gi­cal tis­sues and their func­tions. The aim is to repro­duce living orga­nisms and their pro­cesses, in other words to deve­lop a bio­mi­me­tic approach to medi­cine. This is com­bi­ned with ano­ther approach, bioen­gi­nee­ring, at the inter­sec­tion bet­ween mate­rials science and the bio­lo­gi­cal sciences. Cathe­rine Picart, head of the Bio­mi­me­tics and Rege­ne­ra­tive Medi­cine team in the Bio­san­té Unit at CEA Gre­noble, is using these tools to create bio­ma­te­rials to repair bone tis­sue, in col­la­bo­ra­tion with maxil­lo­fa­cial sur­geons at Anne­cy hos­pi­tal.  The aim is to pro­vide the dama­ged bone with an envi­ron­ment in which it can rebuild itself. To do this, the team desi­gns bio­ma­te­rials contai­ning bone growth fac­tors. They are 3D-prin­ted and a bio­mi­me­tic film, known as an “osteoin­du­cer”, is applied to encou­rage bone regeneration.

New concepts

These bio­ma­te­rials are poly­mers that resemble the extracel­lu­lar matrix, the bio­lo­gi­cal gel found bet­ween ani­mal cells. This cross-lin­ked poly­mer is com­po­sed of hya­lu­ro­nic acid, a poly­mer found in the skin and capable of for­ming very thin films on which growth fac­tor, the pro­tein that controls bone growth, can be depo­si­ted. The film is depo­si­ted on the sur­face of a porous bio­ma­te­rial pro­du­ced by 3D prin­ting. The cells adhere to it and fill the spaces, pro­du­cing bone. This was demons­tra­ted in rodent models in 20161.

This approach has also pro­ved its worth in large ani­mals (pigs, sheep) with bone defects in the jaw and leg23. In humans, this type of mal­for­ma­tion cur­rent­ly requires seve­ral bone graf­ting ope­ra­tions. With the concept of bone rege­ne­ra­tion, it could be as simple as graf­ting syn­the­tic bone and lea­ving it to rebuild itself.

This tech­nique has the advan­tage of pro­du­cing a cus­to­mi­sed, made-to-mea­sure res­to­ra­tion. The 3D mould controls the shape and poro­si­ty of the res­to­red bone, while the sur­face film defines its quan­ti­ty and the speed at which it grows back.

In addi­tion to this bio­mi­me­tic approach, ano­ther focus of the team is to unders­tand how these arti­fi­cial matrices, com­bi­ned with growth fac­tors, act on cells. In par­ti­cu­lar, the aim is to repro­duce in vitro the control they exert over cell com­mu­ni­ca­tion and tis­sue for­ma­tion4

The dif­fi­cul­ty with this work is that the rigi­di­ty of the sur­faces affects the res­ponse of the cells. The Gre­noble resear­chers have the­re­fore deve­lo­ped an approach using flexible bio­mi­me­tic films that are less than two micro­metres thick. The films are depo­si­ted on 96-well plates, com­mon­ly used in bio­me­di­cal research. Each well can the­re­fore consti­tute an expe­ri­men­tal condi­tion, and 96 expe­ri­ments can be car­ried out simul­ta­neous­ly, each with dif­ferent matrix or growth fac­tor compositions.

This approach pro­vides insights into the mole­cu­lar mecha­nisms of bone tis­sue for­ma­tion, which may be use­ful for the cli­ni­cal approach to bone repair.

New tools

Bio­mi­mi­cry also makes it pos­sible to create new medi­cal tools, par­ti­cu­lar­ly for sur­ge­ry. There is a whole range of medi­cal tech­no­lo­gies that seek to repro­duce the pro­per­ties of cer­tain ani­mal or plant spe­cies. One such example is sur­gi­cal needles5 ins­pi­red by para­si­tic wasps, deve­lo­ped by the uni­ver­si­ties of Delft and Wage­nin­gen. Ultra-thin, these needles are made up of seven inde­pendent rods that ensure the elas­ti­ci­ty and strength of the system.

Also in the field of sur­ge­ry, resear­chers at the Ame­ri­can Uni­ver­si­ty of Illi­nois have crea­ted a suc­tion cup ins­pi­red by the octo­pus6 and desi­gned to trans­fer deli­cate tis­sue during trans­plants. This sys­tem uses the elec­tro­ther­mal pro­per­ties of a poly­mer to repro­duce the deli­cate suc­tion of the tentacles.

Sur­gi­cal adhe­sives are ano­ther very pro­mi­sing field of bio­mi­me­tic tools. French com­pa­ny Tis­sium7 appears to be one of the most advan­ced in this field. The Paris-based com­pa­ny has repro­du­ced the pro­per­ties of a marine worm, Phrag­ma­to­po­ma cali­for­ni­ca, which builds sand castles to house its colo­nies. A water-resis­tant cement ensures the soli­di­ty of the edi­fices. A pro­per­ty that is of great inter­est to the sur­gi­cal community.

From fun­da­men­tal research to medi­cal tech­no­lo­gy, the concept of bio­mi­mi­cry is dri­ving medi­cal inno­va­tion. A stu­dy8 by the Indo-Bri­tish stra­te­gic ana­ly­sis firm Pre­ce­dence Research esti­mates that the bio­mi­me­tic medi­cal inno­va­tion mar­ket will be worth more than 33 bil­lion dol­lars in 2022 and could reach 65 bil­lion dol­lars in 2032. These esti­mates are undoub­ted­ly based on a broad defi­ni­tion of bio­mi­me­tic inno­va­tion, but they point to a trend in which a great deal of research will be ente­ring the mar­ket in the next few years.

Agnès Vernet
1Bouyer M et al., Bio­ma­te­rials (2016) 104:168–81. doi : 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.001
2Garot C et al., Adv Heal­thc Mater (2023), e2301692 doi : 10.1002/adhm.202301692
3Bouyer M. et al., Mater Today Bio (2021) 11:100113. doi : 10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100113
4Sales A et al. Bio­ma­te­rials (2022) 281:121363. doi : 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121363.
5https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748–3190/aa92b9
6https://​www​.science​.org/​d​o​i​/​1​0​.​1​1​2​6​/​s​c​i​a​d​v​.​a​b​c5630
7https://​tis​sium​.com
8https://​www​.pre​ce​den​ce​re​search​.com/​m​e​d​i​c​a​l​-​b​i​o​m​i​m​e​t​i​c​s​-​m​arket

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate