huge alpine glacier melts, giving rise to a lake of clear water
Généré par l'IA / Generated using AI
π Space π Planet π Geopolitics
Climate, war, pollution: how satellites are documenting our greatest challenges

The extent of glacier melt measured from space

with Étienne Berthier, Glaciologist at CNRS and Fabien Maussion, Associate Professor at Bristol Glaciology Centre at University of Bristol
On September 24th, 2025 |
4 min reading time
R32_3505
Étienne Berthier
Glaciologist at CNRS
Fabien Maussion
Fabien Maussion
Associate Professor at Bristol Glaciology Centre at University of Bristol
Key takeaways
  • Global warming is causing glaciers and permafrost to melt, reducing the stability of mountainsides and causing accidents.
  • In regions with small glaciers, such as the Alps and Pyrenees, many of them will disappear before the end of the century.
  • Satellites now provide mapping and monitoring of changes in nearly 220,000 existing glaciers.
  • In 2021, satellite observations of glaciers showed a loss of 267 billion tonnes per year between 2000 and 2019.
  • Twice as much glacier mass could be lost if the temperature rises by 2.7°C by the end of the century.

At the end of May 2025, the vil­lage of Blat­ten in Switzer­land was large­ly destroyed by a glac­i­er col­lapse, claim­ing the life of one vic­tim. In moun­tain­ous areas, a trig­ger­ing event – such as heavy rain­fall or high tem­per­a­tures – can desta­bilise slop­ing ter­rain1. This some­times leads to cas­cad­ing process­es, result­ing in rock­falls or glac­i­er col­laps­es, for exam­ple. These risks have always exist­ed, but anthro­pogenic glob­al warm­ing is alter­ing their fre­quen­cy, mag­ni­tude and loca­tion2. Why is this hap­pen­ing? Ris­ing tem­per­a­tures are caus­ing glac­i­ers and per­mafrost to melt, reduc­ing the sta­bil­i­ty of slopes. In France, the num­ber of glacial and periglacial events accel­er­at­ed at the end of the Lit­tle Ice Age (late 19th cen­tu­ry) and again since 1980 (fig. 1.). In regions with small glac­i­ers, such as the Alps and Pyre­nees, many glac­i­ers will dis­ap­pear well before the end of the cen­tu­ry, regard­less of the mit­i­ga­tion efforts implemented.

Fig. 1. Annu­al num­ber of EGP (glacial and periglacial events) record­ed in France. Source: data mis­sion by da Sil­va Q., RTM, 2021. Note: data is aver­aged per decade except for 2020–2021, where the aver­age is cal­cu­lat­ed over two years. This inven­to­ry is undoubt­ed­ly far from exhaus­tive pri­or to 1850.)

Mon­i­tor­ing glac­i­er melt is cru­cial. Nat­ur­al haz­ards, fresh­wa­ter resources, sea lev­el rise, tourism… their melt has an impact on many aspects of soci­ety. How­ev­er, until recent­ly, data remained very sparse on a glob­al scale. “Before satel­lites, we didn’t know how many glac­i­ers there were in the world,” says Fabi­en Maus­sion. The first glob­al inven­to­ry of glac­i­ers dates back only to 20123. While only a few hun­dred glac­i­ers are mon­i­tored on the ground, satel­lite mea­sure­ments pro­vide map­ping and mon­i­tor­ing of changes in near­ly 220,000 exist­ing glac­i­ers4. “It was a rev­o­lu­tion, a new field of research was cre­at­ed: large-scale glaciol­o­gy, con­tin­ues Fabi­en Maussion.

Satellite data: a revolution in glacier observation

The first satel­lite glaciol­o­gy data was extract­ed from images tak­en by the ASTER sen­sor on board the Ter­ra satel­lite, which has been in orbit since 19995. “The mis­sion was not intend­ed for glaciol­o­gy, but Amer­i­can sci­en­tists quick­ly realised its poten­tial for this field of research,” says Éti­enne Berthi­er. Glac­i­ers were then very quick­ly includ­ed in the acqui­si­tions.” In prac­tice, sci­en­tists rely on stere­oscopy: based on two slight­ly off­set satel­lite images of the same region, it is pos­si­ble to recon­struct the region in 3D. This mod­el is called a dig­i­tal ter­rain mod­el [DTM]. By com­par­ing the dif­fer­ence in alti­tude of glac­i­ers over time, it is then pos­si­ble to esti­mate their melt­ing6. “With the ASTER and TanDEM‑X satel­lite mis­sions, the sci­en­tif­ic com­mu­ni­ty has access to opti­cal and radar space mis­sions that enable it to assess changes in the alti­tude of glac­i­ers around the world over the last two decades,” write the authors of an arti­cle in the jour­nal The Cryosphere.

As a result, knowl­edge about glac­i­ers is increas­ing expo­nen­tial­ly, and they are becom­ing key indi­ca­tors of cli­mate change. Changes in mass (fig. 2.), sur­face flow veloc­i­ty, extent and snow cov­er of the world’s glac­i­ers are being scru­ti­nised in detail by satel­lites, which are car­ry­ing more and more instru­ments – inter­fer­om­e­ters, radars, lasers and gravime­ters7. In 2021, the first esti­mate of the vol­ume vari­a­tions of all glac­i­ers was pub­lished: between 2000 and 2019, glac­i­ers lost 267 bil­lion tonnes per year, rep­re­sent­ing one-fifth of the glob­al sea lev­el rise8. These recent­ly updat­ed data show a 36% accel­er­a­tion between the first and sec­ond decades of the peri­od stud­ied9. “We have also high­light­ed that glac­i­er retreat is not uni­form across the plan­et,” adds Éti­enne Berthi­er. Sup­ple­ment­ing this with old­er data from field mea­sure­ments, anoth­er study shows that since 1976, glac­i­ers have lost more than 9 tril­lion tonnes10. This rep­re­sents a glob­al sea lev­el rise of more than 2 cm due sole­ly to the melt­ing of moun­tain glaciers.

Fig. 2. Annu­al mass bal­ance of ref­er­ence glac­i­ers with more than 30 years of ongo­ing gla­co­log­i­cal mea­sure­ments. Annu­al mass change val­ues are giv­en on the y‑axis in the unit meter water equivalent(m w.e.) which cor­re­sponds to tonnes per square meter (1 OOO kg m-2). Source: WGMS (2023, updat­ed and ear­li­er reports).

Between inevitable glacier melt and the importance of mitigation measures

“We use this vital infor­ma­tion about the past to cal­i­brate our math­e­mat­i­cal mod­els,” empha­sis­es Fabi­en Maus­sion. “This enables us to cal­cu­late pro­jec­tions of future changes in glac­i­er mass and their con­tri­bu­tion to sea lev­el rise. This infor­ma­tion is used by the IPCC and deci­sion-mak­ers and is only pos­si­ble thanks to satel­lites.” Last May, an inter­na­tion­al team (includ­ing Fabi­en Maus­sion) showed that the loss of cer­tain glac­i­ers, such as those in the Alps, is inevitable at cur­rent lev­els of warm­ing [11]11. But sci­en­tists also high­light the impor­tance of cli­mate change mit­i­ga­tion: twice as much glac­i­er mass would be lost if warm­ing reach­es 2.7°C by the end of the cen­tu­ry (the cur­rent tra­jec­to­ry) instead of 1.5°C.

Satel­lite data has revealed the glob­al extent of glac­i­er melt over the past two decades. “How­ev­er, there are no satel­lite mis­sions ded­i­cat­ed to glac­i­ers, and some cur­rent mis­sions will end with­in the next two to three years,” observes Éti­enne Berthi­er. “To ensure the con­ti­nu­ity of high-res­o­lu­tion spa­tio-tem­po­ral obser­va­tions, we are pro­mot­ing the 4D Earth mis­sion to space agen­cies.” As cli­mate change is a long process, data cov­er­ing sev­er­al decades is need­ed to quan­ti­fy its con­se­quences. While such data exists for some glac­i­ers thanks to old­er field mea­sure­ments, it is rare in cer­tain regions of Asia and South Amer­i­ca2. Final­ly, it is impos­si­ble to do with­out field data from satel­lites. “Field mea­sure­ments enable us to pro­duce sea­son­al assess­ments and mea­sure the den­si­ty and thick­ness of glac­i­ers. For exam­ple, it is essen­tial to know the den­si­ty of the snow cov­er­ing glac­i­ers and how it changes over time to cal­cu­late mass changes from satel­lite data,” con­cludes Éti­enne Berthier.

Anaïs Marechal
1https://​www​.edu​ca​tion​.gouv​.fr/​r​i​s​q​u​e​s​-​d​-​o​r​i​g​i​n​e​-​g​l​a​c​i​a​i​r​e​-​e​t​-​p​e​r​i​g​l​a​c​i​a​i​r​e​-​e​l​e​m​e​n​t​s​-​e​n​-​s​o​u​t​i​e​n​-​u​n​-​p​l​a​n​-​d​-​a​c​t​i​o​n​-​3​79044
2https://www.ipcc.ch/srocc/chapter/chapter‑2/
3https://​www​.glims​.org/RGI/
4https://​www​.earth​da​ta​.nasa​.gov/​n​e​w​s​/​f​e​a​t​u​r​e​-​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​/​g​l​i​m​s​-​d​a​t​a​b​a​s​e​-​a​d​v​a​n​c​e​s​-​g​l​a​c​i​e​r​-​m​o​n​i​t​o​r​i​n​g​-​f​r​o​m​-​space
5https://​www​.earth​da​ta​.nasa​.gov/​n​e​w​s​/​f​e​a​t​u​r​e​-​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​/​g​l​i​m​s​-​d​a​t​a​b​a​s​e​-​a​d​v​a​n​c​e​s​-​g​l​a​c​i​e​r​-​m​o​n​i​t​o​r​i​n​g​-​f​r​o​m​-​space
6https://​tc​.coper​ni​cus​.org/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​/​1​8​/​3​1​9​5​/​2024/
7Berthi­er review 2023
8https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021–03436‑z?fromPaywallRec=false
9https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024–08545‑z
10https://​essd​.coper​ni​cus​.org/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​/​1​7​/​1​9​7​7​/​2025/
11https://​www​.sci​ence​.org/​d​o​i​/​f​u​l​l​/​1​0​.​1​1​2​6​/​s​c​i​e​n​c​e​.​a​d​u4675

Our world through the lens of science. Every week, in your inbox.

Get the newsletter