Construction Economie Circulaire
π Industry π Planet π Science and technology
How to reduce the carbon footprint of the construction industry

Towards a circular economy in the construction sector ?

with Isabelle Dumé, Science journalist
On January 6th, 2022 |
4min reading time
Noe Basch
Noé Basch
Founder of Lab Ingénierie and Co-founder of Mobius Réemploi
Key takeaways
  • The company, mobius réemploi, is proposing a way to integrating reused materials originating into new or rehabilitated buildings.
  • Their approach involves carrying out in-depth study, from the design phase onwards, to evaluate whether reused materials are better in terms of environmental impact than completely new materials.
  • While reuse of construction materials is good for the environment, at present, it remains more expensive than using new materials.
  • That said, from 2022 onwards the construction sector will be subject to regulations requiring the limitation of carbon emissions, so the question of materials from reuse will become important.
  • The advantage of reuse is that it does not depend raw material markets, so prices can remain stable over time.

With an annual tur­no­ver of around €300bn1, the construc­tion and public works sec­tor accounts for 40% of annual waste pro­duc­tion in France2. These was­ted mate­rials can still often be tech­ni­cal­ly used but they can be cost­ly to dis­pose of, have some­times gone “out of fashion” or no lon­ger com­ply with modern construc­tion stan­dards. This same sec­tor also accounts for approxi­ma­te­ly 30% of green­house gas emis­sions3, main­ly from two sources : the ener­gy consu­med for com­fort of use (hea­ting, air condi­tio­ning, arti­fi­cial ligh­ting, mecha­ni­cal ven­ti­la­tion and hot water) and the ener­gy requi­red for extrac­ting the construc­tion mate­rials, trans­for­ming them into pro­ducts, trans­por­ting them and final­ly trea­ting them at the end of their use­ful life.

The first life cycle ana­lyses car­ried out by construc­tion pro­fes­sio­nals have shown that the car­bon impact of mate­rials over an entire life cycle is 50% for a new buil­ding and 30% for a refur­bi­shed one4. Rough­ly spea­king, half of the car­bon impact of a buil­ding is paid for month­ly by its ener­gy bill, and the other half (“invi­sible” to the inha­bi­tant), lies in the pro­ducts and mate­rials used to construct the building.

Possible solutions

Solu­tions for limi­ting the car­bon impact of ener­gy consump­tion are now well known and are gra­dual­ly being put in place. They include : limi­ting ener­gy needs through bio­cli­ma­tic archi­tec­ture and a ther­mal­ly effi­cient construc­tion ; good pro­duct consump­tion mana­ge­ment ; and using low-car­bon ener­gy pro­duc­tion (heat pumps, wood-fired boi­lers, ther­mal and pho­to­vol­taic solar panels and low-car­bon urban hea­ting networks).

Such decar­bo­ni­sa­tion solu­tions are less com­mon when it comes to mate­rials, but if we take a clo­ser look, they alrea­dy exis­ted in the past : bio-sour­ced mate­rials (struc­tures made of wood or insu­la­tion made of vege­table or ani­mal wool) and recy­cled or reu­sed mate­rials (that do not require an unrea­so­nable amount of ener­gy to recycle).

Mobius reuses

Mobius strives to deve­lop re-employ­ment (a door becomes a door again), reuse (a door becomes a table5) and recy­cling (a door is shred­ded and then used as chip­board or burnt for energy).

Our approach first involves diag­no­sing buil­dings to define the quan­ti­ty, qua­li­ty, ease of remo­val and car­bon impact of each of the pro­ducts and mate­rials used in their construc­tion. This step is fol­lo­wed by the deve­lop­ment of a “mas­ter plan”, which involves either mate­rial conser­va­tion, dona­tion or sale. If the mate­rials can­not be kept, because, for example, they are dee­med too old, they can be dona­ted to asso­cia­tions or buil­ding com­pa­nies, for example, who could then trans­fer the mate­rials to a buil­ding site and/or reuse them for their own needs, so dis­pen­sing with the need to pur­chase new mate­rials and avoi­ding the asso­cia­ted car­bon emis­sions. The waste the­re­fore becomes a valuable com­mo­di­ty because it is no lon­ger consi­de­red as waste but as a resource.

These mate­rials can also be reco­ve­red by a conven­tio­nal waste-treat­ment or demo­li­tion com­pa­ny, but using pro­cesses that allow them to be reu­sed, packa­ged and trans­por­ted. This implies crea­ting and mana­ging sto­rage on site, which is often limi­ted in terms of the space avai­lable, so that these ele­ments can be direct­ly recu­pe­ra­ted or sold. The per­cen­tage of sales is cur­rent­ly rela­ti­ve­ly low, howe­ver, and the main mar­kets are gene­ra­tors, woo­den frames and radiators.

In contrast, we pro­pose inte­gra­ting mate­rials ori­gi­na­ting from reuse into new or reha­bi­li­ta­ted buil­dings. This approach involves car­rying out an archi­tec­tu­ral and tech­ni­cal fea­si­bi­li­ty stu­dy, from the desi­gn phase onwards, to eva­luate whe­ther these mate­rials are bet­ter in terms of envi­ron­men­tal impact than com­ple­te­ly new materials.

It is then a mat­ter of loo­king for future demo­li­tion sites from which to reco­ver poten­tial mate­rials for reuse and then recon­di­tion them before sen­ding them to a new site. This approach has been deve­lo­ped, for example, in the ZAC Saint-Vincent-de-Paul in the 14th arron­dis­se­ment of Paris, where more than 60 000 m²6 of buil­dings have recent­ly been demolished.

Mobius re-industrialises

The main pro­blem with inte­gra­ting mate­rials coming from reuse is the lack of treat­ment chan­nels : if you want to ins­tall 1,000 recon­di­tio­ned radia­tors in one ope­ra­tion in 12 months, for example, it is not easy to find a com­pa­ny big enough to do this. Indeed, reuse is a new domain and requires a cer­tain amount of exper­tise – for example : iden­ti­fying demo­li­tion sites ; reco­ve­ring the mate­rials ; trans­por­ting them from a reco­ve­ry site to a recon­di­tio­ning site ; and then recon­di­tio­ning these ele­ments and sen­ding them to a new, ins­tal­la­tion, site.

This is the chal­lenge we have taken on by deve­lo­ping reu­sed sub­floo­ring, which comes from demo­li­tion sites throu­ghout France and which is then sent to our Ros­ny-sous-Bois fac­to­ry, where, after being bru­shed, san­ded and re-gra­ded, will be reu­sed in office buil­dings, main­ly in the Paris region. The result is a 75% car­bon saving com­pa­red to using a new pro­duct, and more than 2 400 tonnes of waste avoi­ded. The return is low, howe­ver, because a pro­duct made by trans­for­ming or assem­bling exis­ting mate­rials is still chea­per. Reuse is the oppo­site : you have to pay people to reco­ver, treat, trans­port and repa­ckage the waste.

Towards a circular economy ?

The reuse of construc­tion mate­rials is good for the envi­ron­ment, but, at present, it remains more expen­sive than using new mate­rials. It is the­re­fore dif­fi­cult to imple­ment without a par­ti­cu­lar willin­gness on the part of construc­tion companies/builders. That said, from next year the construc­tion sec­tor will be sub­ject to regu­la­tions requi­ring the limi­ta­tion of car­bon emis­sions7. The ques­tion will then be : is it bet­ter to build with wood, stone, recy­cled or reu­sed materials ? 

Final­ly, as we have seen in recent months, the prices of raw mate­rials can fluc­tuate shar­ply and deli­ve­ry times can become lon­ger. For example, the price of wood and metal has been par­ti­cu­lar­ly affec­ted, lea­ding to both addi­tio­nal costs and a slow-down in construc­tion or even fac­to­ry clo­sures. The advan­tage of reuse is that it does not depend on these mar­kets and prices can the­re­fore remain stable over time.

1Tableaux de l’économie fran­çaise, Construc­tion, INSEE, 2019
2Data­lab, Entre­prises du BTP, Minis­tère de l’Environnement, de l’Energie et de la Mer, 2017
3Pano­ra­ma des émis­sions fran­çaises de gaz à effet de serre, Rap­port sur l état de l’environnement, Répu­blique Fran­çaise, 2021
4Retour d’expérience, lab-ingé­nie­rie, 2021
5Ceci n’est pas une porte, AAVP, mobius réem­ploi, Pavillon de l’Arsenal, Faire 2019
6Faire Paris Autre­ment, un pro­gramme mixte, incar­né, ouvert à tous : https://​www​.pari​set​me​tro​pole​-ame​na​ge​ment​.fr/​f​r​/​s​a​i​n​t​-​v​i​n​c​e​n​t​-​d​e​-​p​a​u​l​-​p​a​r​i​s-14e
7RE2020 : Une nou­velle étape vers une future règle­men­ta­tion envi­ron­ne­men­tale des bâti­ments neufs plus ambi­tieuse contre le chan­ge­ment cli­ma­tique, Minis­tère de la Tran­si­tion Eco­lo­gique, 2020

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate