Ciment Bas Carbone
π Industry
How to reduce the carbon footprint of the construction industry

“We can reduce CO2 emissions from cement by a factor of 10”

Isabelle Dumé, Science journalist
On January 6th, 2022 |
3 mins reading time
1
“We can reduce CO2 emissions from cement by a factor of 10”
Mohend Chaouche
Mohend Chaouche
CNRS research director at ENS Paris Saclay
Key takeaways
  • Cement, which is the main component of concrete, is responsible for approximately 7% of global CO2 emissions.
  • The goal of the new Matériaux cimentaires éco-efficaces (MC²E) laboratory, a collaboration between the CNRS, l’ENS Paris Saclay et Ecocem, is to develop alternative low-carbon-impact cements.
  • Researchers at the MC²E have managed to reduce the amount of cement in concrete by a factor of five.
  • They have also developed a new (patented) cement based on waste residues from the steel industry that has an 80% smaller carbon impact than conventional cement. The new cement is already on the market.
  • It might thus be possible to achieve carbon neutrality quite quickly in this area without having to resort to so-called disruptive techniques.

Le dérè­gle­ment cli­ma­tique, lié notam­ment aux 43 mil­liards de tonnes de dioxyde de car­bone (CO2) émis­es par les activ­ités humaines par an rend urgent l’accélération des activ­ités de recherche dans tous les domaines vers des solu­tions à faible impact car­bone. Le ciment, qui est le prin­ci­pal con­sti­tu­ant du béton, est à l’origine à lui seul d’en­v­i­ron 7 % des émis­sions mon­di­ales de CO2

L’objectif du nou­veau lab­o­ra­toire « Matéri­aux cimen­taires éco-effi­caces » (MC²E) est de dévelop­per des ciments à faible impact car­bone. Il est le fruit d’une col­lab­o­ra­tion entre le CNRS, l’ENS Paris Saclay et la société Eco­cem. Cette col­lab­o­ra­tion a notam­ment per­mis de met­tre au point un nou­veau ciment breveté basé sur des résidus de l’in­dus­trie sidérurgique et dont l’im­pact car­bone est réduit d’en­v­i­ron 80 % par rap­port à un ciment classique. 

How is cement made?

Since it was invent­ed two cen­turies ago, con­ven­tion­al, « Port­land », cement, has been the main com­po­nent of build­ing mate­ri­als. This cement is made by mix­ing lime­stone and clay in a ratio of approx­i­mate­ly 80% and 20% respec­tive­ly. The mix­ture is heat­ed to high tem­per­a­tures and under­goes a chem­i­cal reac­tion known as cal­ci­na­tion. Most of the CO2 emis­sions from the man­u­fac­ture of cement result from the break­down of the lime­stone through cal­ci­na­tion (into lime and CO2). Over­all, one tonne of cement pro­duces between 800kg and one tonne of CO2.

One way to reduce these emis­sions would be to sim­ply reduce the amount of cement used in con­struc­tion mate­ri­als such as con­crete. This is fea­si­ble since cement is just a “filler” or “glue” and is main­ly used to fill in the holes between aggre­gates and sand in con­struc­tion mate­ri­als to make them stick together. 

A fivefold reduction in carbon impact

First of all, we man­aged to reduce the amount of cement in con­crete by a fac­tor of five, start­ing with the idea that it is just a binder/glue and that the inter-gran­u­lar space can be filled with some­thing oth­er than cement. For con­ven­tion­al indus­tri­al adhe­sives, such as poly­mer-based glues, the start­ing point is a liq­uid sub­stance that is used to wet the two sur­faces to be bond­ed. This adhe­sive then hard­ens to give the struc­ture its mechan­i­cal strength. Cement works in the same way: cement pow­der is mixed with water to pro­duce a liq­uid that can flow between the aggre­gates and wet them. This liq­uid then hard­ens into a sol­id mate­r­i­al like concrete.

Our new cement men­tioned above is com­plete­ly dif­fer­ent since it does not con­tain con­ven­tion­al cement mate­ri­als. It is made of ground slag, which is the waste residue pro­duced by the steel-mak­ing indus­try. We added a small amount of inert chem­i­cals or “addi­tives”) to this “fine­ly ground gran­u­lat­ed blast-fur­nace slag”, as it is known, to obtain a cement that can be used to make con­crete with a per­for­mance sim­i­lar to that of Port­land-cement-based concrete.

Only 90kg of CO2 emitted per tonne of cement

The pro­duc­tion of one tonne of this new cement results in the emis­sion of approx­i­mate­ly 90kg of CO2. Using this cement instead of Port­land cement could thus pro­duce high per­for­mance, long-last­ing low-car­bon con­crete. In addi­tion, its chem­i­cal char­ac­ter­is­tics give it long-term mechan­i­cal strength and improved resis­tance to sul­phates and chlorides.

The cement we have pro­duced is already on the mar­ket and has been used on a large scale by the Vin­ci Group to build part of its head­quar­ters in the La Défense dis­trict, just out­side Paris. The new mate­r­i­al will also be used in the Paris 2024 Olympic vil­lage and to con­struct the tun­nels of line 18 of the cap­i­tal’s metro.

Artificial Intelligence helps make improved cement 

Until now, builders have not opt­ed for envi­ron­men­tal­ly friend­ly cement alter­na­tives because cement as a mate­r­i­al is so cheap. So much so that there is a lot of waste in the con­struc­tion sec­tor. In addi­tion, con­struc­tion com­pa­nies often use much more cement than nec­es­sary in their con­crete because they – wrong­ly – believe that the final prod­uct is mechan­i­cal­ly safer if it con­tains more cement. The devel­op­ment of arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence tools, such as machine learn­ing, will sim­pli­fy the meth­ods for for­mu­lat­ing con­crete – in par­tic­u­lar when deter­min­ing the opti­mal quan­ti­ties of cement to use in con­struc­tion mate­ri­als and thus reduce their impact in terms of CO2. Such an approach is new in the field, as, until now, engi­neers relied on com­put­er sim­u­la­tions that require spe­cial­ist knowl­edge. Machine learn­ing, on the oth­er hand, can be used by anyone.

We there­fore believe that it is pos­si­ble to achieve car­bon neu­tral­i­ty fair­ly quick­ly in this area with­out hav­ing to resort to so-called dis­rup­tive tech­niques, that is, invent­ing com­plete­ly new ways of mak­ing cement. What could slow down this move­ment are inter­na­tion­al stan­dards, which are always slow­er to evolve than inno­va­tion itself.