1_satellitesPointsLagranges
π Space π Science and technology
Satellites, black holes, exoplanets: when science extends beyond our planet

Satellites : why are ‘Lagrange points’ so important ?

with Paul Ramond, Post-doctoral Fellow in Astrophysics at Université Paris Dauphine-PSL
On June 1st, 2022 |
5min reading time
Paul Ramond modifiée
Paul Ramond
Post-doctoral Fellow in Astrophysics at Université Paris Dauphine-PSL
Key takeaways
  • The JWST satellite, launched on 25th December 2021, recently reached its anchor point in orbit around the sun, known as the L2 Lagrange point.
  • Lagrange points are based on a mathematical conundrum known as the ‘three-body problem’, which involves, for example, two celestial bodies orbiting the sun. This orbit is the first Lagrange point.
  • The co-rotating frame of reference, which reduces the satellite’s trajectory to a single point, allows us to find the other two Lagrange points - L2 and L3 - on the same axis.
  • But there are actually more than three Lagrange points. It was Joseph Louis Lagrange who demonstrated that there are five. However, the two other points are not in the same reference frame as the first ones.

The James Webb Space Teles­cope has arri­ved safe­ly at its des­ti­na­tion – the famous Lagrange point L2 loca­ted in the inter­pla­ne­ta­ry void of our Solar sys­tem, some 1.5 mil­lion kilo­metres from Earth. But why there ? What is so spe­cial about Lagrange points, of which there are seve­ral, that space agen­cies have been sen­ding satel­lites to for the past 50 years ?

The three-body problem

Since Isaac New­ton for­mu­la­ted the laws of mecha­nics and gra­vi­ta­tion at the end of the 17th  Cen­tu­ry, the “three-body pro­blem”, which consists of deter­mi­ning the motion of three celes­tial objects under their mutual gra­vi­ta­tio­nal attrac­tions, has been one of the most fruit­ful pro­blems of clas­si­cal phy­sics. Attempts to solve it have led to count­less theo­re­ti­cal advances, which in turn have enabled many revo­lu­tio­na­ry prac­ti­cal appli­ca­tions. Even though we have a much bet­ter unders­tan­ding of the pro­blem and its dif­fi­cul­ty, in par­ti­cu­lar thanks to the work of Hen­ri Poin­ca­ré at the end of the 19th Cen­tu­ry, it is not, to this day, com­ple­te­ly solved.

Lagrange points natu­ral­ly appear as spe­cial solu­tions of the so-cal­led ‘res­tric­ted’ three-body pro­blem, in which one of the bodies is very small com­pa­red to the other two. This is the case for the motion of a satel­lite around the Sun and a planet.

The balance of forces

Let us first consi­der the orbit of the Earth around the Sun, which is a near-per­fect circle. The Earth makes a com­plete orbit around the Sun in one year, a per­iod known as its revo­lu­tion. Let us now ima­gine pla­cing a satel­lite in a cir­cu­lar orbit around the Sun with the the same revo­lu­tion (exact­ly one year) and such that it always lies on the Earth-Sun axis. By adjus­ting its dis­tance from the Sun in just the right way, the force of attrac­tion of the Sun will exact­ly com­pen­sate for that of the Earth and the satel­lite will be ‘in equilibrium’.

Howe­ver, the satel­lite is also sub­ject to a cen­tri­fu­gal force (the one that pulls us out­wards in a mer­ry-go-round). This force adds to the gra­vi­ta­tio­nal attrac­tions, but does not change the big pic­ture : we can always adjust the posi­tion of the satel­lite on the Sun-Earth axis so that the three forces can­cel one ano­ther, as shown in the figure below.

The orbit of the Earth (green) and that of the satel­lite (grey) around the Sun (orange) in the centre. The attrac­tive forces of the Earth and the Sun are shown, as well as the cen­tri­fu­gal force expe­rien­ced by the satel­lite, in purple.

The co-turning reference frame

The orbit that we have just construc­ted for the satel­lite is pre­ci­se­ly what astro­no­mers call a ‘Lagrange point’. But why Lagrange ‘point’ and not ‘orbit’? The rea­son lies in ano­ther way of loo­king at our pro­blem. Indeed, since the satel­lite and the Earth orbit the Sun in a year, we can ima­gine orbi­ting with them, and take this revo­lu­tion into account in the gra­phic repre­sen­ta­tion of the pro­blem. The satel­li­te’s tra­jec­to­ry is then redu­ced to a point, pla­ced bet­ween the Sun and the Earth, which is also fixed in this so-cal­led ‘co-tur­ning’ refe­rence frame. This point, which in fact repre­sents an orbit, is the Lagrange point L1.

The first three

The co-tur­ning refe­rence frame is very use­ful and allows us to unco­ver four addi­tio­nal Lagrange points, by sim­ply loo­king for other spots where all three forces (Earth and Sun’s attrac­tion and the cen­tri­fu­gal force) can­cel out. Two of these points, cal­led L2 and L3, are also on the Sun-Earth axis, as shown in the figure below.

The orbit of the Earth (green) and the Lagrange points (black) around the Sun (orange) at the centre, in the co-rota­ting refe­rence frame. The attrac­tive and cen­tri­fu­gal forces expe­rien­ced by a satel­lite in each of them are shown. Here the dis­tances and sizes are extre­me­ly exag­ge­ra­ted (see the box for the real values).

The Lagrange point L2 lies on the other side of the Earth from L1, and L3 on the other side of the Sun. It is clear from the figure that the three forces expe­rien­ced by a satel­lite at these points can­cel out : this is why they are also cal­led ‘equi­li­brium points’. Toge­ther with L1, the points L2 and L3 cor­res­pond to three exact solu­tions of the three-body pro­blem deter­mi­ned by Leo­nard Euler and publi­shed in 1765. Loca­ted at the oppo­site end of the Sun from us, the point L3 has been the sub­ject of many flights-of-fan­cy since ancient times. One of these is a hypo­the­ti­cal ‘anti-Earth’, which would exist at L3 but which would be exact­ly hid­den from us by the Sun.

Artificial satellites

On the prac­ti­cal side of things, it is main­ly the L1 and L2 Lagrange points that have inter­es­ted space agen­cies. Indeed, satel­lites are regu­lar­ly sent there for spe­ci­fic scien­ti­fic mis­sions. The first time was in 1978 with the ISEE (Inter­na­tio­nal Sun-Earth Explo­rer) pro­gramme, whose modules were pla­ced in orbit around the L1 Lagrange point of the Sun-Earth sys­tem (loca­ted at 1.5 mil­lion km, that is, at less than 1% of the Earth-Sun dis­tance). Since 2018, the L1 point in the Earth-Moon sys­tem (326,000 km from Earth, 15% of the Earth-Moon dis­tance) has also been home to the Chi­nese relay satel­lite Que­qiao, which com­mu­ni­cates with the Chang’e 4 lunar probe on the far side of the Moon.

The point L2 (also loca­ted about 1.5 mil­lion km from the Earth) of the Sun-Earth sys­tem is home to some of the most extra­or­di­na­ry space mis­sions. Among the most recent is the Planck satel­lite1, laun­ched in 2009 to mea­sure the oldest light in the Uni­verse (known as the cos­mic micro­wave back­ground) with extreme pre­ci­sion. Ano­ther is the LISA Path­fin­der satel­lite, which was laun­ched in 2015 and which aimed to demons­trate how mature the tech­no­lo­gy nee­ded for the future LISA space gra­vi­ty inter­fe­ro­me­ter is. More recent­ly, the Gaia mis­sion2, which cata­logues the posi­tion, speed and light of more than a bil­lion celes­tial objects (stars, but also aste­roids, galaxies, etc.), has also found itself at L2. The latest satel­lite to reach L2 is the James Webb Space Teles­cope3, laun­ched on 25 Decem­ber 2021. Suc­ces­sor to the famous Hubble Space Teles­cope, its mis­sion is to stu­dy near­by exo­pla­nets and explore the far­thest reaches of the Uni­verse to observe the very first galaxies.

It may sound crow­ded up there and you might ask your­self : don’t all those satel­lites at the L2 point run the risk of col­li­ding with each other ? After all, there is only so much space at a Lagrange ‘point’! For­tu­na­te­ly, these satel­lites are not sent to the exact posi­tion of the Lagrange points, but in orbit around them, in an area that is huge com­pa­red to the scale of a satel­lite : seve­ral hun­dred thou­sand kilo­metres in dia­me­ter. The satel­lites are thus in orbit around the Lagrange point, but the small num­ber of adjust­ments requi­red to keep them there are negli­gible com­pa­red to what it would take to keep them in such an orbit elsew­here in the Solar sys­tem. This is the main advan­tage of Lagrange points : gra­vi­ta­tion and mecha­nics ‘natu­ral­ly’ take care of a satellite’s motion so that astro­no­mers can devote them­selves to the beau­ti­ful science that these mis­sions allow !

The last two

It was Joseph-Louis Lagrange who sho­wed in 1772 that two other points, L4 and L5, exist. These are not on the Sun-Earth axis, but loca­ted at equal dis­tance from both, so as to make an equi­la­te­ral tri­angle. At these points, the two gra­vi­ta­tio­nal forces and the cen­tri­fu­gal force, although not ali­gned, still can­cel out exact­ly, as shown in the figure below. In prac­tice, the satel­lite is the­re­fore almost on the Ear­th’s orbit, 60° ahead of (L4) or behind (L5) it.

Natural objects

Since Lagrange points are asso­cia­ted with equi­li­brium posi­tions, it would not be sur­pri­sing to find natu­ral objects (such as small aste­roids) at these loca­tions in the Solar sys­tem. In the case of the Sun-Jupi­ter sys­tem, about 10 000 aste­roids have been obser­ved to date around the L4 and L5 Lagrange points. Cal­led Tro­jan aste­roids, some of these even have natu­ral satel­lites of their own, such as the lar­gest cal­led ‘(624) Hec­tor’ and its aste­roi­dal moon “Sca­man­drios”.

These thou­sands of objects are proof that the Lagran­gian sta­bi­li­ty regions are real and not just theo­re­ti­cal. In fact, most pla­nets of the Solar sys­tem have Tro­jan aste­roids, that is,  small rocky bodies loca­ted near the L4 and L5 loca­tions of the cor­res­pon­ding Sun-pla­net sys­tem. Howe­ver, one mys­te­ry remains, as no Tro­jans have ever been obser­ved for the Earth-Saturn sys­tem. It is sus­pec­ted that gra­vi­ta­tio­nal dis­tur­bances crea­ted by Jupi­ter prevent aste­roids from staying there too long4. Yet, iro­ni­cal­ly, two of Saturn’s natu­ral satel­lites, Tethys and Dionne, have Tro­jans themselves !

1https://​planck​sa​tel​lite​.org​.uk/​m​i​s​sion/
2https://​gaia​-mis​sion​.cnes​.fr/​e​n​/​G​A​I​A​/​i​n​d​e​x.htm
3https://​www​.jwst​.nasa​.gov/
4Influence of the coor­bi­tal reso­nance on the rota­tion of the Tro­jan satel­lites of Saturn, Phi­lippe Robu­tel, Nico­las Ram­baux & Maryame El Mou­ta­mid Celes­tial Mecha­nics and Dyna­mi­cal Astro­no­my volume 113, pages1–22 (2012)

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate