02_accordsParis
π Planet π Energy
Mitigating climate change: are efforts paying off?

10 years after the Paris Agreement, who are the G20’s “good performers”?

with Anna Pérez Català, Head of Research at Institut du Développement Durable et des Relations Internationales
On April 23rd, 2025 |
4 min reading time
PHOTO UP-20230110-TORRES‑2–2‑2
Anna Pérez Català
Head of Research at Institut du Développement Durable et des Relations Internationales
Key takeaways
  • This year marks the 10th anniversary of the Paris Agreement, an international treaty aimed at keeping global temperature rise below 2°C compared to pre-industrial levels.
  • The average temperature over the last decade was already 1.1°C higher than in the pre-industrial period, and we are still far from meeting the mitigation targets.
  • However, some countries stand out for their effective mitigation measures and have succeeded in reducing their greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Ten G20 regions and nations have reached their peak emissions, an essential prerequisite for achieving carbon neutrality.
  • Countries with particularly ambitious targets include the United Kingdom, South Africa and Chile.

This year marks the tenth anni­ver­sa­ry of the Paris Agree­ment. This legal­ly bin­ding inter­na­tio­nal trea­ty aims to keep the glo­bal ave­rage tem­pe­ra­ture rise well below 2°C above pre-indus­trial levels1. Ten years after its adop­tion, where do we stand ? “There is evi­dence of pro­gress, but the pace needs to increase signi­fi­cant­ly,” sum­ma­rises Anna Pérez Cata­là. Some coun­tries are stan­ding out with effec­tive miti­ga­tion mea­sures and have begun to reduce their green­house gas emis­sions, sho­wing that it is pos­sible to put huma­ni­ty on the right track. The solu­tions are well known : deve­lop rene­wable ener­gy, elec­tri­fy urban sys­tems, improve ener­gy effi­cien­cy and agri­cul­tu­ral mana­ge­ment, and reduce food waste2. It is essen­tial to achieve car­bon neu­tra­li­ty, i.e. to emit no more CO2 than car­bon sinks are capable of absorbing.

The ave­rage tem­pe­ra­ture over the last decade was alrea­dy 1.1°C higher than in the pre-indus­trial per­iod3. Make no mis­take, while this article high­lights some examples of coun­tries that are doing well, the miti­ga­tion tra­jec­to­ry is still far from mee­ting the Paris Agree­ment tar­gets. In 2023, green­house gas (GHG) emis­sions rea­ched a new record high after years of growth : 57.1 bil­lion tonnes of CO2 equi­va­lent (a unit that takes into account all GHGs4). Pro­jec­tions show that cur­rent poli­cies are com­pa­tible with a war­ming of 2.7°C to 3.1°C by 2100, accor­ding to esti­mates5. In an opti­mis­tic sce­na­rio where coun­tries deli­ver on all their pro­mises (as sta­ted in their natio­nal­ly deter­mi­ned contri­bu­tions and car­bon neu­tra­li­ty com­mit­ments), war­ming would reach 1.9°C by the end of the century.

Source : Emis­sions Gap Report 20246

Positive signs of decarbonisation

There are posi­tive signs. Ten G20 regions and nations have rea­ched peak emis­sions, an essen­tial pre­re­qui­site for achie­ving car­bon neu­tra­li­ty (Argen­ti­na, Aus­tra­lia, Bra­zil, Cana­da, the Euro­pean Union, Japan, Rus­sia, South Afri­ca, the Uni­ted King­dom and the Uni­ted States). A report publi­shed in 2021 high­lights the impor­tance of car­bon neu­tra­li­ty as a dri­ver of change7. Accor­ding to the authors, “even if these changes do not neces­sa­ri­ly trans­late into suf­fi­cient­ly ambi­tious emis­sions reduc­tions, they help to gra­dual­ly create the condi­tions for deep decar­bo­ni­sa­tion in the coming decades.” Accor­ding to the Uni­ted Nations Emis­sion Gap Report, 107 coun­tries – repre­sen­ting 82% of glo­bal GHG emis­sions – had adop­ted car­bon neu­tra­li­ty com­mit­ments by Sep­tem­ber 2024. Five coun­tries repre­sen­ting 0.1% of glo­bal emis­sions have achie­ved car­bon neu­tra­li­ty (Bhu­tan, Como­ros, Gabon, Guya­na and Suri­name8). Accor­ding to the Cli­mate Action Tra­cker upda­ted in Decem­ber 2023, only five regions and nations have ade­qua­te­ly desi­gned car­bon neu­tra­li­ty tar­gets : Chile, Colom­bia, Cos­ta Rica, the Euro­pean Union and the Uni­ted King­dom9.

“When we look at socie­tal changes or legis­la­tion, we see that a tran­si­tion is under­way,” says Anna Pérez Cata­là. “Cur­rent mea­sures are not enough, but the Paris Agree­ment pro­vides for per­io­dic reviews, which helps bring us clo­ser to the long-term goals.” A cen­tral ins­tru­ment of the Paris Agree­ment, natio­nal­ly deter­mi­ned contri­bu­tions (NDCs) are regu­lar­ly upda­ted. They reflect each country’s efforts to reduce GHG emis­sions. The latest review, expec­ted in Februa­ry 2025, is still ongoing for many coun­tries. Howe­ver, there remains a gap bet­ween ambi­tion and rea­li­ty. Among the G20 coun­tries, 11 would not be able to achieve their NDC tar­gets with cur­rent poli­cies. Seve­ral G20 mem­bers could achieve their tar­gets, but these have not been sca­led up, or have been sca­led up only mar­gi­nal­ly, since the Paris Agreement.

Source : Emis­sions Gap Report 202410

Countries with ambitious goals to combat global warming

Is it pos­sible to iden­ti­fy the best per­for­mers ? “No coun­try is per­fect, but accor­ding to the indi­ca­tors obser­ved, some coun­tries are sho­wing signi­fi­cant ambi­tion,” replies Anna Pérez Cata­là. She conti­nues : “One example is the Uni­ted King­dom, which has pro­du­ced an impres­sive upda­ted NDC, ali­gned with the scien­ti­fic objec­tives and the goal of limi­ting glo­bal war­ming to 1.5°C. South Afri­ca also prio­ri­tises cli­mate issues, with a dedi­ca­ted pre­si­den­tial com­mis­sion. Chile stands out for cal­cu­la­ting emis­sions reduc­tions in abso­lute rather than rela­tive terms. It is essen­tial to consi­der dif­ferent indi­ca­tors to deter­mine whe­ther a coun­try is on track.”

As the world’s lar­gest emit­ter of green­house gases, ener­gy is one of these impor­tant indi­ca­tors. Fos­sil fuels are still the main source of glo­bal ener­gy, but their share is decli­ning as solar and wind power gene­ra­tion increases. Emis­sions from the ener­gy sec­tor could soon peak. The Uni­ted King­dom is one of the coun­tries lea­ding the way with a rapid ener­gy tran­si­tion. It was one of the first to legis­late in favour of a long-term GHG emis­sion reduc­tion tar­get for the entire eco­no­my. All coal-fired power sta­tions have been clo­sed, and rene­wable ener­gies have been deployed on a mas­sive scale, par­ti­cu­lar­ly off­shore wind farms. Bet­ween the ear­ly 2000s and 2023, the country’s CO2 emis­sions fell from around 570 mega­tonnes per year to 305 mega­tonnes. Scot­land, Aus­tria, Den­mark and Cali­for­nia also aim to gene­rate 100% of their elec­tri­ci­ty from renewables.

“It is also impor­tant to ensure a fair and equi­table tran­si­tion, other­wise there is a risk of gene­ra­ting resis­tance, as is cur­rent­ly the case with boi­lers in Ger­ma­ny and elec­tric cars in France,” adds Anna Pérez Cata­là. It is dif­fi­cult to pro­vide a miracle solu­tion for the tran­si­tion, as miti­ga­tion stra­te­gies dif­fer from one region to ano­ther. But there are cer­tain­ly examples of suc­cess that can be repli­ca­ted. “For example, Spain has achie­ved a social­ly just phase-out of coal by trai­ning and re-employing for­mer miners in other sec­tors of the local eco­no­my,” explains Anna Pérez Cata­là. “This requires signi­fi­cant plan­ning and invest­ment, but it is neces­sa­ry to ensure fair transitions.”

While eco­no­mic growth remains a goal for many coun­tries, the IPCC noted in 2022 that 43 out of 166 coun­tries mana­ged to sta­bi­lise or reduce their GHG emis­sions while increa­sing their GDP bet­ween 2010 and 201511. “A group of deve­lo­ped coun­tries, such as some EU coun­tries and the Uni­ted States, and some deve­lo­ping coun­tries, such as Cuba, have achie­ved a com­plete decou­pling of consump­tion-based CO2 emis­sions and GDP growth,” the IPCC conti­nues. “Once again, a just tran­si­tion that incor­po­rates long-term stra­te­gies is cru­cial to suc­cess­ful miti­ga­tion,” concludes Anna Pérez Cata­là. “Geo­po­li­ti­cal chal­lenges such as wars and poli­ti­cal changes are hin­de­ring coope­ra­tion, but we have high hopes for the next COP in Bra­zil, whose diplo­ma­tic skills could posi­ti­ve­ly influence the outcome.”

Anaïs Marechal

1https://unfccc.int/fr/a‑propos-des-ndcs/l‑accord-de-paris
2https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/chapter/chapter‑4/
3https://​www​.ipcc​.ch/​r​e​p​o​r​t​/​a​r​6​/​s​y​r​/​d​o​w​n​l​o​a​d​s​/​r​e​p​o​r​t​/​I​P​C​C​_​A​R​6​_​S​Y​R​_​S​P​M.pdf
4Uni­ted Nations Envi­ron­ment Pro­gramme (2024). Emis­sions Gap Report 2024 : No more hot air … please ! With a mas­sive gap bet­ween rhe­to­ric and rea­li­ty, coun­tries draft new cli­mate com­mit­ments. Nai­ro­bi. https://​doi​.org/​1​0​.​5​9​1​1​7​/​2​0​.​5​0​0​.​1​1​8​2​2​/​46404.
5https://​cli​ma​teac​tion​tra​cker​.org/​g​l​o​b​a​l​/​c​a​t​-​t​h​e​r​m​o​m​eter/
6https://​www​.unep​.org/​r​e​s​o​u​r​c​e​s​/​e​m​i​s​s​i​o​n​s​-​g​a​p​-​r​e​p​o​r​t​-2024
7https://www.iddri.org/sites/default/files/PDF/Publications/Catalogue%20Iddri/Rapport/DDP_beyond%20emissions%20report.pdf
8https://​zero​tra​cker​.net
9https://​cli​ma​teac​tion​tra​cker​.org/​g​l​o​b​a​l​/​c​a​t​-​n​e​t​-​z​e​r​o​-​t​a​r​g​e​t​-​e​v​a​l​u​a​t​ions/
10https://​www​.unep​.org/​r​e​s​o​u​r​c​e​s​/​e​m​i​s​s​i​o​n​s​-​g​a​p​-​r​e​p​o​r​t​-2024
11https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/chapter/chapter‑2/

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate