Home / Chroniques / How to put life on hold… or die temporarily
Set of different legumes in glass jars on, concrete white table. A source of protein for vegetarians. The concept of healthy eating and food storage.
π Science and technology π Society

How to put life on hold… or die temporarily

Tania Louis
Tania Louis
PhD in biology and Columnist at Polytechnique Insights
Key takeaways
  • Death is a process with a complex definition, characterised by a number of different elements.
  • The living world is full of examples that overturn our binary representation.
  • Seeds, for example, can remain in a state of inactivity, known as dormancy, until the right external conditions trigger their germination.
  • Dormancy or cryptobiosis, a form of temporary death, can become veritable time capsules, giving “organisms remarkable longevity.
  • These different forms of slowed life open up a debate on our definition of death and the world around us.

The heart stops, there is no brain activ­ity, the body cools down and, finally, the molecu­lar activ­ity with­in each cell dis­ap­pears. Although not sim­ul­tan­eous, human death is marked by sev­er­al char­ac­ter­ist­ic ele­ments. How­ever, determ­in­ing wheth­er an organ­ism is dead or alive is not always straight­for­ward. There are com­plex clin­ic­al situ­ations: anim­als, for example, prac­tice thanatosis, or death sim­u­la­tion, to deter pred­at­ors. Many organ­isms can go through states that chal­lenge our bin­ary per­cep­tion of life and death. 

In your kit­chen cup­boards you may find rice, len­tils, nuts, pota­toes, onions, apples… All these struc­tures are of plant ori­gin. In oth­er words, they were once alive. But which ones are still alive? In some cases, the answer is obvi­ous: a stalk pro­trud­ing from a potato fil­let or a sprout pier­cing the skin of an onion are not so subtle clues. There is life in your cup­boards. But it’s not always so clear-cut: how can you tell the dif­fer­ence between a dead and a liv­ing lentil?

Seeds are repro­duct­ive struc­tures, con­tain­ing an embryo and nutri­ent reserves sheltered by a pro­tect­ive integ­u­ment. They are cap­able of remain­ing in a state of appar­ent inactiv­ity until extern­al con­di­tions (tem­per­at­ure, light, humid­ity, etc.) trig­ger ger­min­a­tion. In the mean­time, they show no signs of life, but this does not mean they are dead. In fact, they are in an extremely slowed-down state of life known as dormancy. And this state is revers­ible: if you place len­tils on wet cot­ton wool, they will prob­ably end up ger­min­at­ing. But there’s no point in try­ing the same thing with white rice. Those seeds have been hulled and only the nutri­ent tis­sue they con­tained has reached your kitchen.

Slowing life down to a standstill

Dormancy is a wide­spread phe­nomen­on in the nat­ur­al world. In some organ­isms, it is sys­tem­at­ic and genet­ic­ally pro­grammed, while in oth­ers it is triggered only when liv­ing con­di­tions become too unfa­vour­able. The term dia­pause or qui­es­cence is also used to describe cer­tain forms of life slow­ing down. Like seed plants, vari­ous mam­mals can, for example, put their repro­duc­tion on hold, with females sav­ing embry­os without imme­di­ately implant­ing them in their uter­us. This pro­cess, known as embryon­ic dia­pause1, makes it pos­sible to adapt life cycles to the resources avail­able – which vary accord­ing to the sea­son – and to ensure the best pos­sible con­di­tions for the offspring.

In some organ­isms, the meta­bol­ism doesn’t just slow down: it stops. These organ­isms are said to be in crypto­bi­os­is, lit­er­ally “hid­den life.” They are not dead, since this state is revers­ible, but they are no longer obvi­ously alive. Crypto­bi­os­is can there­fore be con­sidered as life in a lat­ent state, a form of tem­por­ary death, or as a third state, dif­fer­ent from both life and death2. In fact, the physiology of organ­isms in crypto­bi­os­is is pro­foundly altered.

There are sev­er­al forms of crypto­bi­os­is, linked to dif­fer­ent extreme con­di­tions. The most extens­ively stud­ied is anhyd­ro­bi­os­is. Anhyd­ro­bi­os­is is char­ac­ter­ised by the loss of almost all the water in an organ­ism, which is essen­tial for main­tain­ing its integ­rity at cel­lu­lar and bod­ily level3. Loc­al replace­ment of water, trans­ition to a vit­ri­fied state or spe­cif­ic pro­tec­tion of cer­tain com­pounds, vari­ous molecu­lar adapt­a­tions make it pos­sible to tol­er­ate this drastic change4. As a res­ult, when they are rehyd­rated, anhyd­ro­bi­ot­ic organ­isms can come back to life, or reviv­i­fy. Under­stand­ing the mech­an­isms involved in this phe­nomen­on could be a source of innov­a­tion for all pro­cesses for pre­serving bio­lo­gic­al struc­tures by dry­ing or freez­ing, both in medi­cine and the food industry.

The inventiveness of micro-organisms

Crypto­bi­os­is exists on every branch of the liv­ing tree. Anim­als are cap­able of it, not­ably roti­fers, nem­at­odes and the fam­ous tar­di­grades5. But plants are also affected, such as mosses and cer­tain ferns. The list extends to lichens, fungi and many uni­cel­lu­lar, euk­a­ryot­ic and proka­ryot­ic organ­isms. Many micro-organ­isms can also form res­ist­ance struc­tures, more or less dehyd­rated, whose meta­bol­ic activ­ity is slowed or even stopped.

Some fungi and myx­o­my­cetes, such as the blob Physar­um poly­ceph­alum, sur­vive dif­fi­cult peri­ods in the form of desic­cated scler­o­tia. Bac­teria can divide asym­met­ric­ally to pro­duce endospores that are extremely res­ist­ant, includ­ing to heat and anti­bi­ot­ics. Many prot­ists, unclas­si­fi­able uni­cel­lu­lar euk­a­ryotes that are neither anim­als, plants nor fungi, form cysts. Res­ist­ant to cold and desic­ca­tion, these struc­tures enable many para­sit­ic spe­cies to spread. Sim­il­arly, vir­al particles are inert in the extern­al envir­on­ment until they encounter a cell to be infected.

Wheth­er this is dormancy or true crypto­bi­os­is with ces­sa­tion of meta­bol­ism (which is not eas­ily determ­ined in prac­tice6), these aston­ish­ing states can become ver­it­able time cap­sules, par­tic­u­larly when placed in favour­able con­ser­va­tion con­di­tions. Cysts have been brought back to life after spend­ing a hun­dred years in the sed­i­ments of a Swedish fjord7 or at the bot­tom of the Balt­ic Sea8. Mosses have been revived after a thou­sand years in the Ant­arc­tic per­ma­frost9. In the Arc­tic, nem­at­odes that emerged from 30,000 to 40,000-year-old per­ma­frost have been revived in the labor­at­ory10, as have partheno­gen­et­ic roti­fers that have been bur­ied for around 24,000 years11. The old­est vir­uses that are still infec­tious, taken from frozen Siberi­an soil, are giant vir­uses that infect amoebas and are close to 50,000 years old…

Questioning our definitions

The exist­ence of dif­fer­ent forms of slowed or arres­ted life has giv­en rise to debate among spe­cial­ists: where does dormancy end and crypto­bi­os­is begin? Is the lat­ter just an extreme form of the former? Which struc­tures fall into which cat­egor­ies? The world around us is in fact a con­tinuum, in which it may seem futile to try to dis­tin­guish clear-cut cat­egor­ies. And this also applies to the notions of life and death. Wheth­er we favour a defin­i­tion based on func­tions, struc­tures, phys­ic­al chem­istry or philo­sophy, extreme cases are valu­able food for thought.

Can we say that micro­scop­ic anim­als that have sur­vived for tens of thou­sands of years in frozen ground have “lived” there? Did they live for an extremely long time, were they tem­por­ar­ily dead, or did they exper­i­ence a state that is neither life nor death? These ques­tions seem to be taken from works of sci­ence fic­tion, involving long inter­stel­lar jour­neys, but they are being asked by organ­isms that live on our plan­et today. And for the moment, there is no con­sensus on how to answer them.

1Char­lotte Cristin. La dia­pause embry­on­naire et sa régu­la­tion chez les mam­mi­fères, étude bib­li­o­graph­ique de 1850 à nos jours. Sci­ences du Vivant [q‑bio]. 2022.
2James S. Clegg. Crypto­bi­os­is — a pecu­li­ar state of bio­lo­gic­al organ­iz­a­tion. Com­par­at­ive Bio­chem­istry and Physiology Part B: Bio­chem­istry and Molecu­lar Bio­logy, Volume 128, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 613–624, ISSN 1096–4959.
3Grzyb, T.; Skłodowska. A. Intro­duc­tion to Bac­teri­al Anhyd­ro­bi­os­is: A Gen­er­al Per­spect­ive and the Mech­an­isms of Desic­ca­tion-Asso­ci­ated Dam­ageMicroor­gan­isms 2022, 10, 432. 
4Hib­sh­man Jonath­an D., Clegg James S., Gold­stein Bob. Mech­an­isms of Desic­ca­tion Tol­er­ance: Themes and Vari­ations in Brine Shrimp, Round­worms, and Tar­di­grades. Fron­ti­ers in Physiology, Volume 11, 2020.
5Nadja Møb­jerg, Ricardo Car­doso Neves. New insights into sur­viv­al strategies of tar­di­grades, Com­par­at­ive Bio­chem­istry and Physiology Part A: Molecu­lar & Integ­rat­ive Physiology, Volume 254, 2021, 110890, ISSN 1095–6433.
6Bosch, J., Varliero, G., Hall­s­worth, J.E., Dal­las, T.D., Hop­kins, D., Frey, B., Kong, W., Lebre, P., Makhalan­yane, T.P. and Cow­an. D.A. (2021), Micro­bi­al anhyd­ro­bi­os­is. Environ Micro­bi­ol, 23: 6377–6390.   
7Nina Lund­holm, Sofia Ribeiro, Thor­b­jørn J. Ander­sen, Trine Koch, Anna Godhe, Flem­ming Eke­lund & Mari­anne Elleg­aard (2011) Bur­ied alive – ger­min­a­tion of up to a cen­tury-old mar­ine prot­ist rest­ing stages, Phy­co­lo­gia, 50:6, 629–640, DOI: 10.2216/11–16.1
8Anke Kremp, Jana Hin­ners, Riina Klais, Ari-Pekka Lep­pän­en & Antti Kal­lio (2018) Pat­terns of ver­tic­al cyst dis­tri­bu­tion and sur­viv­al in 100-year-old sed­i­ment archives of three spring dino­fla­gel­late spe­cies from the North­ern Balt­ic Sea, European Journ­al of Phy­co­logy, 53:2, 135–145, DOI: 10.1080/09670262.2017.1386330
9Esme Roads, Royce E. Long­ton, Peter Con­vey. Mil­len­ni­al times­cale regen­er­a­tion in a moss from Ant­arc­tica, Cur­rent Bio­logy, Volume 24, Issue 6, PR222-R223, 2014.
10Shat­ilovich, A.V., Tchesun­ov, A.V., Neretina, T.V. et al. Viable Nem­at­odes from Late Pleis­to­cene Per­ma­frost of the Kolyma River Low­landDokl Biol Sci 480, 100–102 (2018).
11Lyubov Shmakova, Stas Malav­in, Nat­aliia Iakoven­ko et al. A liv­ing bdel­loid roti­fer from 24,000-year-old Arc­tic per­ma­frost, Cur­rent Bio­logy, Volume 31, Issue 11, 2021. [12] M, Santini S, et al. An Update on Euk­a­ryot­ic Vir­uses Revived from Ancient Per­ma­frostVir­uses. 2023; 15(2):564.

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate