Home / Chroniques / Dark side of the Moon: the first samples arrive on Earth
blue earth seen from the moon surface
π Space π Science and technology

Dark side of the Moon: the first samples arrive on Earth

Pierre-Yves Meslin
Pierre-Yves Meslin
Scientific Manager of DORN Mission at Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie
Key takeaways
  • The Chinese probe Chang'E 6, launched on 3rd May 3 2024, brought back to Earth the first samples from the far side of the Moon.
  • It carried DORN, the first French instrument to operate on the Moon’s surface; its mission was to measure radon (a radioactive gas continuously produced in regolith).
  • One of Chang'E's objectives is to understand the difference in volcanic activity on the Moon's visible and, more importantly, its hidden sides.
  • In one region of the far side, there may have been at least two volcanic events, occurring at different ages from those on the visible side.
  • Analyses will refine observations made by remote sensing, which have shown the specific geophysical, chemical and mineralogical composition of the far side.

China’s Chang’E 6 probe, launched on 3rd May  20241, brought back to Earth the first samples from the far side of the Moon. The mis­sion car­ried sev­er­al inter­na­tion­al pay­loads, includ­ing the French instru­ment DORN2 (Detec­tion of Out­gass­ing RadoN). This was the first act­ive French instru­ment deployed on the Moon’s sur­face, and its mis­sion was to meas­ure radon, a radio­act­ive gas con­tinu­ously pro­duced in the rego­lith, in order to study the ori­gin and dynam­ics of the thin atmo­sphere (known as the exo­sphere) sur­round­ing our satel­lite. It also aimed to bet­ter under­stand the spa­tial and tem­por­al vari­ations in this gas, which had been detec­ted from orbit by the Apollo 15–16, Lun­ar Pro­spect­or and Kaguya-SELENE mis­sions, and which sug­ges­ted the pres­ence of highly loc­al­ized out­gass­ing activ­ity, pos­sibly cor­rel­ated with cer­tain seis­mic events.

DORN was designed and built at IRAP3, the Insti­tute for Research in Astro­phys­ics and Plan­et­o­logy, and is a pro­ject man­aged by the Centre nation­al d’études spa­tiales (CNES) in col­lab­or­a­tion with CNRS, Toulouse III – Paul Sabati­er Uni­ver­sity, and the Insti­tute of Geo­logy and Geo­phys­ics of the Chinese Academy of Sci­ences (IGG-CAS). This instru­ment is the first col­lab­or­a­tion between France and China in the field of plan­et­ary explor­a­tion. Its dis­cov­er­ies will help us to bet­ter under­stand the migra­tion of gases on the sur­face of the Moon (the most access­ible body without an atmo­sphere) and, more gen­er­ally, the inter­ac­tions and exchanges between plan­et­ary sur­faces and their space environment.

An asymmetry between the visible and hidden sides of the Moon

The samples from the new 54-day mis­sion are very dif­fer­ent from those col­lec­ted by pre­vi­ous mis­sions, which all came from the vis­ible side of the Moon. Chang’E landed on 2nd June 2 2024 at a pre-selec­ted site (the Apollo crater) inside a very large impact basin 2,400 km in dia­met­er, known as the South Pole-Aitken (SPA), which may have exposed lun­ar mantle rocks on the sur­face. The chosen site is covered with dark, cooled lava flows (basalts), which resemble the lun­ar seas found mainly on the vis­ible side of the Moon (also of vol­can­ic ori­gin), but which are scarcely present on its hid­den side.

Photo taken on the sur­face of the Moon by the lander Chang’E 64.

One of the aims of recov­er­ing samples from this region is to under­stand the asym­metry between the vis­ible and hid­den sides of the Moon, and to under­stand why vol­can­ic activ­ity there has been dif­fer­ent. The samples – over 2 kg of rego­lith and lun­ar rocks – were obtained using a drill and robot­ic arm5. The load then lif­ted off from the lun­ar sur­face, docked and trans­ferred to the re-entry cap­sule, which remained in orbit, before return­ing to Earth.

“DORN recor­ded almost 110 hours of data in orbit and 20 hours of data dur­ing sur­face oper­a­tions,” explains Pierre-Yves Meslin, sci­entif­ic man­ager of the DORN mis­sion at IRAP.  He and his team are cur­rently ana­lys­ing the data.

Hypotheses about volcanic activity on the far side of the Moon

For the Chinese sci­ent­ists, the first ana­lyses of the samples car­ried out in the labor­at­ory using radiomet­ric dat­ing, based on meas­ure­ments of lead, rubid­i­um and stron­ti­um iso­topes, indic­ate the pres­ence of basalt­ic rock frag­ments dat­ing back 4.2 and 2.8 bil­lion years, thus reveal­ing the exist­ence of at least two vol­can­ic events in this region. The vol­can­ic activ­ity that took place on the far side appears to have occurred at dif­fer­ent ages from the vol­can­ism that is char­ac­ter­ist­ic of the vis­ible side, which mainly dates back more than 3 bil­lion years, accord­ing to estim­ates based on the ana­lys­is of lun­ar samples brought back by the Amer­ic­an ‘Apollo’ and Soviet ‘Luna’ mis­sions. These new dis­cov­er­ies were pub­lished by Zexi­an Cui and his col­leagues from the Guang­zhou Insti­tute of Geo­chem­istry of the Chinese Academy of Sci­ences in the journ­al Sci­ence6, and by Qian Zhang’s team from the Beijing Insti­tute of Geo­logy and Geo­phys­ics in the journ­al Nature7. The lat­ter study dates cer­tain samples back 4.2 bil­lion years.

The research­ers believe that the thin crust beneath the SPA basin may have allowed vol­can­ism to per­sist in this region. They have been able to show that it was prob­ably not the con­tent of radio­act­ive ele­ments (urani­um, thori­um, potassi­um-40), highly enriched in cer­tain vol­can­ic plains on the vis­ible side, that was respons­ible for this vol­can­ism. But the rel­at­ive rar­ity of traces of vol­can­ism on the hid­den face remains to be explained.

The non-basalt­ic samples also col­lec­ted will provide a bet­ter under­stand­ing of the form­a­tion of the primary lun­ar crust (light-col­oured high plat­eaux char­ac­ter­ist­ic of the far side of the Moon), the effect of impact pro­cesses on this crust, and per­haps access to the com­pos­i­tion of the lun­ar mantle, pos­sibly exposed in the SPA basin. 

“These ana­lyses will make it pos­sible to refine pre­vi­ous obser­va­tions made by remote sens­ing, which have shown that the far side of the Moon is dif­fer­ent from the vis­ible side in terms of geo­phys­ics (dif­fer­ences in the thick­ness of the crust, for example) and the chem­ic­al and min­er­alo­gic­al com­pos­i­tion of the rocks,” explains Pierre-Yves Meslin. For example, the quant­it­ies of potassi­um, rare earths and phos­phor­us (known togeth­er as KREEP) dif­fer from one side of the Moon to the other.

The giant impact that cre­ated the SPA basin could be the cause, since it was power­ful enough to redis­trib­ute lun­ar mater­i­als. For example, it could have trans­por­ted mater­i­als rich in KREEP towards the vis­ible side of the Moon, leav­ing the mantle on the hid­den side depleted in KREEP.

Isabelle Dumé
1https://​cnes​.fr/​a​c​t​u​a​l​i​t​e​s​/​c​h​a​n​g​e​-​6​d​o​r​n​-​s​u​c​c​e​s​-​d​e​-​m​i​s​s​i​o​n​-​f​a​c​e​-​c​a​c​h​e​e​-​d​e​-lune
2https://​cnes​.fr/​p​r​o​j​e​t​s​/dorn
3https://​www​.irap​.omp​.eu
4Cred­its: CNSA
5https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024–01625‑0
6https://​www​.sci​ence​.org/​d​o​i​/​1​0​.​1​1​2​6​/​s​c​i​e​n​c​e​.​a​d​t1093
7https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024–08382‑0

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate