Home / Chroniques / Resistance: how to encourage uptake of new innovations 
π Videos π Society π Science and technology

Resistance : how to encourage uptake of new innovations 

Cécile Chamaret
Cécile Chamaret
Professor in Marketing and Consumer Behaviour at Ecole Polytechnique (IP Paris)
Etienne Bressoud
Étienne Bressoud
Head of Marketing Science at Institut BVA
Key takeaways
  • If individuals perceive risks linked to an innovation, however small, then resistance and opposition can become a barrier.
  • People tend to overestimate the losses rather than the gains that an innovation is likely to bring them.
  • This is what happened with the Linky metres, which met with strong resistance in France and across the EU for economic or ecological reasons.
  • A nudge is an incentive, which can be visual or auditory, that leads an individual to opt for one product or behaviour rather than another.
  • With nudges, it is possible to achieve up to 20-30% behavioural change in a given population.

What are the rea­sons why people adopt or reject an inno­va­tion ? Can we encou­rage people to fol­low a spe­ci­fic beha­viour rather than one that is adop­ted “natu­ral­ly”? This is the research topic of Cécile Cha­ma­ret, lec­tu­rer at École Poly­tech­nique (IP Paris). She is inter­es­ted in the mecha­nisms of resis­tance to inno­va­tion by indi­vi­duals, but also by lar­ger scale orga­ni­sa­tions such as local authorities. 

Linky, a textbook case 

Cécile Cha­ma­ret has publi­shed a stu­dy on the rea­sons why near­ly 1,000 muni­ci­pa­li­ties in France refu­sed, under pres­sure from their consti­tuents, to replace conven­tio­nal elec­tri­ci­ty metres with Lin­ky “smart” metres. The lat­ter are desi­gned to be more effi­cient and pro­vide new ser­vices such as remote acti­va­tion and dai­ly moni­to­ring of ener­gy consump­tion. “We loo­ked in detail at the rea­sons behind near­ly 450 decrees issued by muni­ci­pa­li­ties to pro­hi­bit the ins­tal­la­tion of these new metres,” explains the researcher.

Some town coun­cils put for­ward the risk of data pira­cy (and the­re­fore of non-res­pect pri­va­cy), some insis­ted on the eco­no­mic risk such as higher bills, and others fea­red the phy­si­cal effects on consu­mers’ health, lin­ked to the waves ema­na­ting from these metres. Final­ly, eco­lo­gi­cal argu­ments were also put for­ward such as what is the need to replace 50 mil­lion metres, which are still func­tio­nal and expec­ted to last 50 years, with metres with a life span of 15 years ? And what’s more, without kno­wing what was going to be done with the old metres !

As Cécile Cha­ma­ret points out, if people or public autho­ri­ties per­ceive risks lin­ked to an inno­va­tion, howe­ver small, then the phe­no­me­na of resis­tance and oppo­si­tion will be very signi­fi­cant. Because the various risks asso­cia­ted with the new metres were not consi­de­red, well-foun­ded or not, « posi­tive » com­mu­ni­ca­tion efforts by the public ener­gy com­pa­ny ins­tal­ling them, Ene­dis, did not convince the recal­ci­trant – argu­ments which inclu­ded free ins­tal­la­tion the eco­lo­gi­cal bene­fits. “Adop­ting a new pro­duct repre­sents finan­cial costs for the indi­vi­dual, but also the psy­cho­lo­gi­cal costs of lear­ning and giving up the pre­vious pro­duct”, she points out.

Adopting innovations 

The dis­h­wa­sher is a good example. Des­cri­bed as a dis­rup­tive inno­va­tion, because it pro­vi­ded a ser­vice that did not exist before its inven­tion, it never­the­less had a hard time gai­ning accep­tance. At first, people only saw the disad­van­tages ! It was expen­sive, requi­red a lot of hand­ling and adap­ted pro­ducts (rin­sing liquid, salts, spe­ci­fic dis­h­wa­shing pro­ducts); it made noise, took up space, and moreo­ver it endan­ge­red the social role of the hou­se­wife ! Faced with the out­cry, manu­fac­tu­rers qui­ck­ly chan­ged their stra­te­gy, and rather than tar­ge­ting pri­vate indi­vi­duals, they sold dis­h­wa­shers to kit­chen desi­gners, who were res­pon­sible for intro­du­cing them into the dai­ly lives of pri­vate individuals… 

“Contra­ry to what you might think, people tend to over­va­lue what they have and ove­res­ti­mate the losses rather than the gains that a new pro­duct is like­ly to bring them,” adds Cécile Cha­ma­ret. If your inno­va­tion is just a lit­tle bet­ter than what alrea­dy exists, it is unli­ke­ly to be adop­ted. It’s a balan­cing act bet­ween a cost and a bene­fit : what will this new pro­duct bring and vice ver­sa ?

If your inno­va­tion is just a lit­tle bit bet­ter than what alrea­dy exists, it is unli­ke­ly to be adopted.

Today, Cécile Cha­ma­ret is wor­king on a new research pro­gramme on sobrie­ty to bet­ter unders­tand an indi­vi­dual’s moti­va­tions for chan­ging or not chan­ging their beha­viour. She is also stu­dying « dro­pouts », dri­vers who have adop­ted the elec­tric vehicle only to return to the inter­nal com­bus­tion vehicle. In the Uni­ted States, this repre­sents 20% of elec­tric vehicle buyers ! This shows that inno­va­tion is never easy… 

But it is always pos­sible to influence consu­mer beha­viour so that they go for a par­ti­cu­lar pro­duct, par­ti­cu­lar­ly through what are known as “nudges”. Étienne Bres­soud, depu­ty direc­tor gene­ral of the BVA Nudge Unit, is the spe­cia­list in France the nudge – incen­tives that can be visual or audi­to­ry, and that will lead an indi­vi­dual to opt for a beha­viour, or for a pro­duct, rather than another. 

The influence of nudges

To stu­dy the issue, Etienne Bres­soud uses beha­viou­ral sciences (cog­ni­tive psy­cho­lo­gy, social psy­cho­lo­gy, neu­ros­cience), which show that human beings are not as ratio­nal as we might think in their deci­sions and that they are great­ly influen­ced by the phy­si­cal and social context in which they find themselves. 

For example, if you are with your col­leagues in a room where there is a free cof­fee machine and a small sign tells you to put 20 cents in a pig­gy bank when you have a cof­fee, you will cer­tain­ly put the 20 cents if your col­leagues are present, but if you are alone, you will tend to “for­get”. To check this, resear­chers used a visual nudge : they stuck a pos­ter above the cof­fee machine sho­wing a pair of wide-open eyes fixed on the poten­tial cof­fee consu­mer. With the pos­ter, the money dona­ted was three times greater !

Richard Tha­ler and Cathe­rine Steen are the two Ame­ri­can co-authors of the nudge concept, which they publi­shed in 2008. Having become an advi­sor to David Came­ron in England in 2010, Richard Tha­ler first used nudges in public poli­cy to encou­rage the English to pay their taxes more qui­ck­ly, by sen­ding out a gene­ra­li­sed let­ter sta­ting that 9 out of 10 people paid their taxes as soon as they recei­ved their tax notice. To com­ply with this social norm, more English people paid their taxes qui­ck­ly ! In France, from 2013 onwards, nudges have also been used by the tax autho­ri­ties to encou­rage more people to switch from paper to elec­tro­nic declarations. 

Nudges help people move from inten­tion to action.

“Final­ly, the nudge allows us to help people move from inten­tion to action,” says Étienne Bres­soud. It’s not about get­ting them to adopt beha­viours that they don’t want to do. Applied to consump­tion, nudge is not going to make a cus­to­mer buy a pro­duct he or she doesn’t want. But nudge can guide cer­tain pur­cha­sing behaviour. 

Targeting consumers

For example, manu­fac­tu­rers have deve­lo­ped com­pres­sed deo­do­rant bot­tles that have exact­ly the same content as tra­di­tio­nal bot­tles but are more envi­ron­men­tal­ly friend­ly (same amount of pro­duct trans­por­ted with fewer trucks, less space on the shelves, etc.). “But no mat­ter how much you explain to the consu­mer that they have the same content in a clas­sic deo­do­rant as in a com­pres­sed deo­do­rant, they will have the impres­sion that they are paying the same price for a less inter­es­ting pro­duct, » explains Etienne Bres­soud. “Because in the super­mar­ket aisle, the indi­vi­dual is in an almost auto­ma­tic, non-reflec­tive pur­cha­sing sys­tem. The nudge in this case will consist of modi­fying the phy­si­cal envi­ron­ment of the consu­mer, by playing on the shelf layout : by pla­cing the small deo­do­rant on a wedge, it will be at the same height as the large one, so that the consu­mer will more easi­ly buy the com­pres­sed deodorant.”

Can the nudge be used to mani­pu­late indi­vi­duals ? “If the com­pa­ny uses nudges for its own pur­poses at the expense of the consu­mer, this is cal­led the dark nudge,” says Etienne Bres­soud. For example, many com­pa­nies use default choices (pre-ticked boxes, for example) in mai­lings sent online to their cus­to­mers to force them into their data­bases and then force them to receive pro­mo­tio­nal offers, some­times dai­ly. This method of choice by default is so power­ful that the legis­la­tor has sei­zed upon it and pro­hi­bi­ted its use to pro­tect per­so­nal data. “But if I explain the rea­sons why I have set up a par­ti­cu­lar nudge and the per­son agrees with the motives (to encou­rage the pur­chase of more eco­lo­gi­cal pro­ducts, for example), then we are very far from a pure­ly com­mer­cial approach,” argues Étienne Bressoud. 

Depen­ding on the indi­vi­dual and the type of nudge, the effec­ti­ve­ness will be more or less impor­tant, but it is pos­sible to obtain up to 20 to 30% of beha­viou­ral changes in a given population.

Marina Julienne

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate