1_cadrillage
π Space
Is the satellite industry entering a “low-cost” era?

Nanosatellites : more than an educational tool ?

with Antoine Tavant, Technical Director of the Space Centre at École polytechnique (IP Paris)
On April 27th, 2021 |
4min reading time
Antoine Tavant
Antoine Tavant
Technical Director of the Space Centre at École polytechnique (IP Paris)
Key takeaways
  • A nanosatellite can weigh up to 6,000 times less than a “standard” telecommunications satellite. This raises the question: what can you do in space with such a light object?
  • The interest in nanosatellites lies largely in their ability to be sent in constellations; one of the reasons why the number of launches has increased more than tenfold since 2013.
  • Their plug-and-play nature is also one of their major assets, as is their low cost.
  • All of this makes nanosatellites an excellent teaching tool for university projects such as the one at the École Polytechnique Space Centre.

Space, hither­to an area res­tric­ted to a few govern­men­tal agen­cies, is now acces­sible to a wide range of people. As such, satel­lites have bene­fi­ted from the minia­tu­ri­sa­tion of elec­tro­nics to shrink to the size of “nano­sa­tel­lites”. Even if this cate­go­ry is not clear­ly defi­ned, it gene­ral­ly desi­gnates small-sized satel­lites : bet­ween 1 and 25 kg, while “mini­sa­tel­lites” weigh bet­ween 100 and 500 kg and a stan­dard tele­com­mu­ni­ca­tions satel­lite weighs near­ly 6,000 kg.

Their small size, low cost and the rise of an eco­sys­tem of sup­pliers have gran­ted stu­dents, scien­tists, or pri­vate com­pa­nies, an easier access to space. From 1998 to 2012, only 136 nano­sa­tel­lites were laun­ched. In the past seven years, this figure has been mul­ti­plied by 10 and has rea­ched a total of 1338 nano­sa­tel­lites. They have a bright future ahead of them : an esti­ma­ted 630 nano­sa­tel­lites are to be laun­ched on ave­rage each year in the near future1.

The ori­gins of nanosatellites

Intro­du­ced as a desi­gn exer­cise at the Stan­ford Uni­ver­si­ty in 1999, the Cube­Sat for­mat is one of the pre­cur­sors of nano­sa­tel­lites. It is the first stan­dard space plat­form which made it pos­sible to reuse sys­tems bet­ween dif­ferent mis­sions. It allo­wed many com­pa­nies to offer ele­ments based on the plug-and-play model to rapid­ly deve­lop new mis­sions. In view of the pro­li­fe­ra­tion of these satel­lites, ride­share launch ser­vices (to allow com­pa­nies to share laun­chers) became wides­pread and many launch pro­jects emer­ged. More than 140 micro-laun­chers are now in deve­lop­ment to meet the increa­sing demand and eight of them are alrea­dy ope­ra­tio­nal2.

Scien­tists and engi­neers very qui­ck­ly used these new low-cost plat­forms to deve­lop mis­sions of tech­no­lo­gy demons­tra­tion, like the GomX series (ESA and Gom­Space), as well as scien­ti­fic mis­sions like AMI­Cal Sat, UVS­Q­Sat and Eye­sat to only men­tion French Cube­Sats laun­ched in the past two years.

Their small size does not pre­clude com­mer­cial mis­sions. This has not gone unno­ti­ced by French com­pa­nies which have sent into orbit satel­lites such as ANGELS to locate bea­cons (Heme­ria, 2019), or the BRO satel­lites for elec­tro­ma­gne­tic intel­li­gence (Unseen­Labs, 2019 and 2020).

Ion­Sat satel­lite Satel­lite Ion­Sat © Space Centre at École polytechnique

A power­ful edu­ca­tio­nal tool

Their redu­ced cost usual­ly makes nano­sa­tel­lites a first-class edu­ca­tio­nal tool. They ans­wer a real need in higher edu­ca­tion by making it pos­sible for stu­dents to acquire concrete expe­rience through student pro­jects. Indeed, up until now, an engi­neer left his or her school with a won­der­ful theo­re­ti­cal back­ground, but with no prac­ti­cal expe­rience. This pro­blem is even more impor­tant in the space sec­tor because engi­neers, once they get a posi­tion, can spend years desi­gning a space sys­tem without ever real­ly seeing it.

Par­ti­ci­pa­ting in a space pro­ject during stu­dies thus repre­sents a rich expe­rience for stu­dents. All the more so since they work on various fields cove­ring mecha­ni­cal desi­gn and embar­ked data pro­ces­sing, as well as ther­mal ana­ly­sis and flight mecha­nics, not to men­tion pro­ject mana­ge­ment and team­work. The expe­rience is all the more rewar­ding because a nano­sa­tel­lite remains a com­ple­te­ly non-repai­rable auto­no­mous sys­tem ope­ra­ting in a dif­fi­cult, even hos­tile, envi­ron­ment : there is no second chance.

It is for these rea­sons that the École Poly­tech­nique chose to men­tor Cube­Sat student pro­jects as ear­ly as 2011. The X‑CubeSat mis­sion (mem­ber of the QB-50 mis­sion laun­ched in April 2017, and which ended in Februa­ry 2019) invol­ved more than 80 stu­dents from 7 dif­ferent year groups. Fol­lo­wing that ope­ra­tio­nal and aca­de­mic suc­cess, a second pro­ject, named Ion­Sat3, was ini­tia­ted by the Space Centre of the École Poly­tech­nique in 2017, in col­la­bo­ra­tion with the ThrustMe start-up. The main mis­sion of Ion­Sat is kee­ping the nano­sa­tel­lite in very low orbit thanks to an elec­tric thrus­ter. More than 50 stu­dents have alrea­dy contri­bu­ted to the pre­li­mi­na­ry desi­gn of this 6‑unit Cube­Sat (a volume of 30x20x10 cm). But these pro­jects are also of inter­est for major sta­ke­hol­ders. Thus, Ion­Sat is led in part­ner­ship with Thales Ale­nia Space, which is, in addi­tion to Aria­ne­Group, a spon­sor of the edu­ca­tion pro­gram “Space : science and space-rela­ted chal­lenges” of École polytechnique.

The new para­digm of constellations

The limi­ted per­for­mance of these nano­sa­tel­lites is off­set by their use as satel­lite constel­la­tions (mea­ning in net­works or swarms) in order to offer ser­vices which typi­cal mis­sions can­not achieve. The Ame­ri­can com­pa­ny Pla­net thus laun­ched more than 100 3‑unit Cube­Sats (30x10x10 cm) bet­ween 2013 and 2020 to observe all the Earth’s sur­face at least once a day. In 2020, 90 constel­la­tion pro­jects were thus recor­ded4.

Howe­ver, all the weak­nesses of nano­sa­tel­lites can­not be sol­ved by laun­ching them in great num­bers. For example, there is a ques­tion of balance bet­ween the part of the satel­lite dedi­ca­ted to the mis­sion and the other func­tio­na­li­ties, for ins­tance to main­tain orbit. For obser­va­tion, reso­lu­tion is pro­por­tio­nal to sen­sor size, nano­sa­tel­lites are thus limi­ted in this res­pect. The for­mat poses fur­ther limi­ta­tions, espe­cial­ly with regard to com­mu­ni­ca­tions : these are limi­ted by the low agi­li­ty and elec­tri­cal capa­ci­ty of the platform.

To face these chal­lenges, some com­pa­nies, like the Kineis com­pa­ny from Tou­louse, pro­duce slight­ly big­ger satel­lites, but which are still small enough to belong to the “nano­sa­tel­lite” cate­go­ry. Others, with a big­ger mar­ket, have cho­sen to increase the per­for­mance of their satel­lites by taking advan­tage of the bene­fits of constel­la­tion without limi­ting their size to the nano­sa­tel­lite for­mat. That is why more ambi­tious mega-constel­la­tion pro­jects, such as One­Web and Star­link, focus on “Small­Sats” (150 kg and 230 kg, res­pec­ti­ve­ly). With a big num­ber of low-cost but power­ful satel­lites, they have the best of both worlds.

A strong latent potential

Yet nano­sa­tel­lites will not stay limi­ted to low-cost or edu­ca­tio­nal pro­jects only. Indeed, the expe­rience feed­back from pio­neer mis­sions has shown their value in the context of scien­ti­fic mis­sions5. In addi­tion to obser­ving Earth, as pre­vious­ly men­tio­ned, these Cube­Sats can be used in solar wea­ther research thanks to mass spec­tro­me­ters (SENSE in 2013) or X‑ray detec­tors (Min­XSS in 2016); in astro­phy­sics with the minia­ture teles­cope ASTERIA (2017) or the Halo­Sat mis­sion (2018); in space explo­ra­tion, as was the case for the Mar­CO Cube­Sats (Mars Cube One) which accom­pa­nied the Insight Probe to Mars in 2018, and the Lunar Fla­sh­light which will accom­pa­ny the Arte­mis I mis­sion on the Moon in 2021. The appli­ca­tions of nano­sa­tel­lites are thus limi­ted only by our imagination !

1https://​www​.nano​sats​.eu/
2Joseph N. Pel­ton, Scott Madry – Hand­book of Small Satel­lites-Sprin­ger Inter­na­tio­nal Publishing_Springer (2020)
3https://​cen​tre​spa​tial​-poly​tech​nique​.fr/​i​o​nsat/
4G. Cur­zi et al. Large Constel­la­tions of Small Satel­lites : A Sur­vey of Near Future Chal­lenges and Mis­sions. Aeros­pace. 2020 ; 7(9):133. https://​doi​.org/​1​0​.​3​3​9​0​/​a​e​r​o​s​p​a​c​e​7​0​90133
5A. Pogho­syan, A. Gol­kar, Cube­Sat evo­lu­tion : Ana­ly­zing Cube­Sat capa­bi­li­ties for conduc­ting science mis­sions, Pro­gress in Aeros­pace Sciences, 2017, https://​doi​.org/​1​0​.​1​0​1​6​/​j​.​p​a​e​r​o​s​c​i​.​2​0​1​6​.​1​1.002

Contributors

Antoine Tavant

Antoine Tavant

Technical Director of the Space Centre at École polytechnique (IP Paris)

Antoine Tavant coordinates the activities of the Centre Spatial de l'École polytechnique (CSEP), which proposes and conducts space-related student projects at the École polytechnique. These projects include two nanosatellite projects and three experimental rocket projects in 2021. These projects aim to have students work on concrete and innovative projects, in line with the current space sector. Antoine is an alumnus of both École polytechnique and ISAE SUPAERO, having started his research at the University of California at Berkley, before doing a thesis on electric propulsion for satellites with Safran at the Plasma Physics Laboratory.

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate