Home / Chroniques / Immense remaining oil reserves and the challenge of reducing consumption
π Energy π Geopolitics π Industry

Immense remaining oil reserves and the challenge of reducing consumption

LE SOLLEUZ_Antoine
Antoine Le Solleuz
Director of Studies at the École des Mines de Nancy
GANTOIS_Olivier
Olivier Gantois
Executive Chairman of Ufip Energies and Mobilities
Key takeaways
  • Oil, a major contributor to the greenhouse effect, now accounts for 32% of the global energy mix.
  • The global economic recovery following the pandemic has increased demand for oil worldwide.
  • But there will be no “peak oil”: we have more oil reserves than we need, at 150-160 Gt at its lowest.
  • Oil has certain advantages and will continue to be used unless governments take restrictive measures.
  • There are several ways to reduce GHG emissions, such as energy sobriety or the development of renewable energies.

Taking into account the most conser­va­tive esti­mates, the known and quan­ti­fied volumes of hydro­car­bon reserves remai­ning on Earth today cor­res­pond to the total amount we have consu­med since the begin­ning of the oil era (i.e. the end of the 19th Cen­tu­ry). This is equi­va­lent to 150–160 Gt1 oil equi­va­lent. These quan­ti­ties are four times higher if we consi­der the stocks that have not yet been pre­ci­se­ly quan­ti­fied (600 Gt), although some of these resources may be dif­fi­cult to exploit for geo­lo­gi­cal, eco­no­mic, or geo­po­li­ti­cal rea­sons. Accor­ding to a new report2 , the world’s fos­sil fuel reserves contain the equi­va­lent of 3,500 bil­lion tonnes of green­house gases (GHGs). These gases, if relea­sed, would jeo­par­dise inter­na­tio­nal cli­mate tar­gets3 .

The inven­to­ry, which contains data on more than 50,000 sites in near­ly 90 coun­tries, is used to pro­vide the infor­ma­tion nee­ded to manage the phase-out of fos­sil fuels. In par­ti­cu­lar, it shows that the US and Rus­sia each hold enough reserves to blow the entire glo­bal car­bon bud­get, even if all other coun­tries stop­ped pro­duc­tion imme­dia­te­ly. It also finds that the world’s most power­ful source of emis­sions is in the Gha­war oil field in Sau­di Arabia.

Peak oil will not happen

“We grew up with the idea of peak oil, thin­king that there would be an inevi­table shor­tage by 2010–2020,” explains Antoine Le Sol­leuz. “This notion no lon­ger exists, because oil com­pa­nies have inves­ted so much in hydro­car­bon explo­ra­tion that they dis­co­ver new depo­sits eve­ry year. We are now in a situa­tion where pos­sible oil reserves exceed consumption.”

We are now in a situa­tion where pos­sible oil reserves exceed consumption.

“The notion of peak oil results from the notion of oil reserves,” adds Oli­vier Gan­tois. “What is announ­ced as oil reserves at any given time are the volumes of oil that have been iden­ti­fied and that we know how to pro­duce with today’s tech­no­lo­gies and at today’s prices. The price of a bar­rel is $85, but if we have a part of the reserves that costs $100/barrel to pro­duce, we don’t count it as reserves because it is not eco­no­mic. This means that if tomor­row we have the same quan­ti­ties of hydro­car­bons, but the price of a bar­rel rises to $120 bar­rel (as was the case last July), these volumes can then be coun­ted as part of the reserves.”

These sources of oil are clas­si­fied as conven­tio­nal or uncon­ven­tio­nal. In conven­tio­nal sources, the oil in the bedrock migrates to a per­meable reser­voir, from which it can then be extrac­ted rela­ti­ve­ly easily.

Uncon­ven­tio­nal sources are dif­ferent in that the reserve is either contai­ned in a vir­tual­ly imper­meable reser­voir or in the bedrock itself, from which it must be extrac­ted – which is tech­ni­cal­ly more dif­fi­cult. The dis­co­ve­ry of uncon­ven­tio­nal depo­sits, the best known of which is shale gas, has qua­dru­pled in recent years com­pa­red to the begin­ning of the cen­tu­ry, and these sources have even become the norm in some coun­tries. Indeed, they have enabled coun­tries such as the Uni­ted States to become ener­gy inde­pendent, allo­wing them to disen­gage from the conflicts in the Middle East. 

In addi­tion to the US, uncon­ven­tio­nal depo­sits have also been dis­co­ve­red in Cana­da, France, the UK, Poland, Rus­sia, and Alge­ria, to name a few. France has deci­ded not to exploit these depo­sits, unlike other Euro­pean coun­tries. It should be noted that non-conven­tio­nal depo­sits involve the use of tech­niques such as hydrau­lic frac­tu­ring, which is cur­rent­ly pro­hi­bi­ted by law4 .

The danger of incorrect estimates

“There are pos­sible reserves (90% uncer­tain­ty), pro­bable reserves (50% uncer­tain­ty) and pro­ven reserves (10% uncer­tain­ty),” says Antoine Le Sol­leuz. “Vene­zue­la, for example, is still consi­de­red to have the lar­gest esti­ma­ted reserves, although this can­not be confir­med by other coun­tries as the esti­mates are publi­shed by the Vene­zue­lan autho­ri­ties them­selves. There are also coun­tries that are self-suf­fi­cient and have refu­sed to involve large pri­vate ener­gy com­pa­nies such as BP, Shell, Total and Exxon. This allows them to esti­mate their own reserves, which also frees them from the stock mar­ket and other eco­no­mic sys­tems. This is the case in Sau­di Ara­bia, for example, where only the natio­nal com­pa­ny, Sau­di Aram­co, is allo­wed to operate.”

Howe­ver, a country’s esti­mates can be “incor­rect” – inten­tio­nal­ly or unin­ten­tio­nal­ly – which can create insta­bi­li­ties in the stock mar­kets because other coun­tries can­not com­pare them­selves and thus set a rea­lis­tic price. To gain the confi­dence of inves­tors, major oil com­pa­nies publish their own esti­mates : if they under- or ove­res­ti­mate their reserves, they suf­fer direct conse­quences on the finan­cial markets.

BP and Shell, for example, faced scan­dals of ove­res­ti­ma­ting their pro­ven reserves in conven­tio­nal reser­voirs. As a result, the finan­cial mar­kets lost confi­dence in these com­pa­nies. Howe­ver, this finan­cial and scien­ti­fic confi­dence is essen­tial, as it is the key to sus­tai­ning finan­cial invest­ments in explo­ra­tion and pro­duc­tion. These invest­ments are beco­ming increa­sin­gly impor­tant over time, using more and more sophis­ti­ca­ted geo­phy­si­cal tech­niques, more and more com­plex wells, in more and more extreme geo­lo­gi­cal contexts. 

“We can­not (and should not) ans­wer the ques­tion of reserves in terms of num­ber of years if we conti­nue to consume at the same rate as today,” main­tains Antoine Le Sol­leuz. “Because the more we invest, the more we find. And the oil com­pa­nies conti­nue to invest.”

Our cur­rent eco­no­my is hea­vi­ly dependent on it, but oil is a major contri­bu­tor to green­house gas emis­sions. Today, it accounts for 32% of the glo­bal ener­gy mix5. To meet the com­mit­ments of the Paris Agree­ment and reduce GHG emis­sions by 45% by 2030 (com­pa­red to 2010 levels), we need to gra­dual­ly reduce our use of oil in favour of decar­bo­ni­sed energy.

Regulation is needed

France aims to esta­blish a sus­tai­nable ener­gy model, thanks to the 2015 Ener­gy Tran­si­tion Act6 and an invest­ment of more than five bil­lion euros per year in rene­wable ener­gies, by diver­si­fying the ener­gy mix : fos­sil fuels should be redu­ced by 30% by 2030 (com­pa­red to 2012). The ener­gy-cli­mate law of 8th  Novem­ber 2019 has even set a new, even more ambi­tious tar­get of 40%. 

Other mea­sures affect pro­duc­tion, and France has adop­ted two laws concer­ning the exploi­ta­tion of hydro­car­bons. The first one bans outright the explo­ra­tion and exploi­ta­tion of non-conven­tio­nal hydro­car­bon mines by hydrau­lic frac­tu­ring. The second puts an end to the explo­ra­tion and exploi­ta­tion of hydro­car­bons by 2040.

Consu­mers will conti­nue to use oil if res­tric­tive mea­sures are not put in place by the government.

The glo­bal eco­no­mic reco­ve­ry fol­lo­wing the Covid-19 pan­de­mic is increa­sing the level of demand for oil, which had fal­len signi­fi­cant­ly during the per­iod when res­tric­tions were put in place to contain the spread of the virus. Demand has almost retur­ned to its pre-cri­sis level (100 mil­lion bar­rels per day), which is reflec­ted in the price of Brent crude oil today.

The growth in demand must be control­led to control GHG emis­sions, accor­ding to the IEA which publi­shed a report in June 20217. The mea­sures advo­ca­ted in the report include the intro­duc­tion of a new ener­gy model based on rene­wable ener­gy and nuclear power.

“The pro­blem that we are facing today is that oil and oil pro­ducts have many advan­tages,” explains Oli­vier Gan­tois. “They are concen­tra­ted forms of ener­gy, so they are easy to trans­port and store. Consu­mers will the­re­fore conti­nue to use oil and pos­si­bly even more of it if res­tric­tive mea­sures are not put in place by public authorities.”

The EU has deci­ded to ban the sale of inter­nal com­bus­tion engine vehicles from 2035.

An example : a few weeks ago, the EU deci­ded to ban the sale of inter­nal com­bus­tion engine vehicles, those using liquid fuels, from 2035. Only deci­sions like this will reduce the use of liquid fuel for road trans­port. Howe­ver, it will take some time to see the effects of this mea­sure : in France, we have about 45 mil­lion vehicles on the road, and new vehicles account for only 2 mil­lion per year.

“As we like to put it, there are five main ways to reduce GHG emis­sions : Not consu­ming ener­gy (com­mon­ly refer­red to as ener­gy sobrie­ty); using ener­gy more effi­cient­ly ; deve­lo­ping rene­wable ener­gies that do not emit GHGs ; decar­bo­ni­sing liquid ener­gies (pro­du­cing them from waste, or bio­mass); the cir­cu­lar eco­no­my – i.e. reu­sing eve­ry­thing that can be reu­sed (plas­tics that we use direct­ly, car­bon emis­sions that we reco­ver to make syn­the­tic fuels…). Each of these five dyna­mics will lead to a reduc­tion in oil consump­tion and thus in GHG emis­sions into the atmosphere.”

Isabelle Dumé
1Gt : giga tonne 
2https://​fos​sil​fuel​re​gis​try​.org
3https://​car​bon​tra​cker​.org/​f​i​n​a​l​l​y​-​w​e​-​h​a​v​e​-​a​-​g​l​o​b​a​l​-​r​e​g​i​s​t​r​y​-​o​f​-​f​o​s​s​i​l​-​f​uels/
4https://​www​.legi​france​.gouv​.fr/​l​o​d​a​/​i​d​/​J​O​R​F​T​E​X​T​0​0​0​0​2​4​3​6​1355/
5https://www.statistiques.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/2019–05/datalab-46-chiffres-cles-du-climat-edition-2019-novembre2018.pdf
6https://​www​.vie​-publique​.fr/​l​o​i​/​2​0​7​2​9​-​e​c​o​l​o​g​i​e​-​t​r​a​n​s​i​t​i​o​n​-​e​n​e​r​g​e​t​i​q​u​e​-​c​r​o​i​s​s​a​n​c​e​-​verte
7https://​www​.iea​.org/​r​e​p​o​r​t​s​/​n​e​t​-​z​e​r​o​-​b​y​-2050

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate