Home / Chroniques / HPI, gifted, zebra: what’s the scientific reality behind these French terms?
small beautiful girl in a school uniform against the background of a classroom, education, learning, child, kid, schoolgirl, student, pupil, smart person, portrait, face, knowledge, children, smiling
©Julia Zarubina, Adobe Stock
π Health and biotech π Society π Neuroscience

HPI, gifted, zebra: what’s the scientific reality behind these French terms?

Nicolas Gauvrit
Nicolas Gauvrit
Lecturer in Cognitive sciences at Université de Lille
Key takeaways
  • The most commonly used definition of the term HIP, often used in France, describes a person with above-average intellectual ability, i.e. an IQ above 130.
  • A number of other terms (zebra, gifted, precocious, etc.) are sometimes used in French, but their respective definitions do not relate to high intellectual potential.
  • A persistent stereotype of HIP people is that they are more unhappy and anxious than others, but scientific studies refute this idea.
  • One of the only personality traits exacerbated in HIP people is openness, which encompasses curiosity, imagination and an understanding of different moral values.
  • Diagnosing an HIP is not imperative: in some cases it is useful and sheds light on a situation, but sometimes the verdict becomes – wrongly – an explanation for everything.

In recent years, dis­cus­sions and debates about high intel­lec­tu­al poten­tial (“HIP”) have garnered a great deal of atten­tion. The phe­nomen­on has even become par­tic­u­larly pop­u­lar with the broad­cast on TF1 of a series of the same name (HPI) fea­tur­ing an invest­ig­at­or with above-aver­age intel­lec­tu­al abil­it­ies. With this grow­ing interest, tests are mul­tiply­ing to find out wheth­er or not you are HIP. The sub­ject has almost become a fad, which inev­it­ably brings with it its share of fantas­ies. How­ever, the term HIP encom­passes a sci­entif­ic reality.

“High intellectual potential is defined by an above-average intelligence quotient”: true

High intel­lec­tu­al poten­tial is defined by an intel­li­gence quo­tient (IQ) above 130, with the aver­age IQ being between 90 and 110. HIPs are in the top 2.3% in terms of IQ. This is the most com­mon defin­i­tion. The term HIP emphas­ises the fact that this is a poten­ti­al­ity. It means that the per­son has the abil­ity to achieve great things in the intel­lec­tu­al sphere. How­ever, this does not neces­sar­ily mean that they will, as oth­er factors come into play. The sci­entif­ic lit­er­at­ure some­times prefers the term high intel­li­gence quo­tient (IQ), which has the advant­age of being purely descriptive.

“Zebra, HIP, gifted, precocious all mean the same thing”: false

Dif­fer­ent words are used to describe high intel­lec­tu­al poten­tial, and they cov­er dif­fer­ent defin­i­tions. “Pre­co­cious” is the term used by the French Min­istry of Edu­ca­tion, refer­ring to a per­son who is intel­lec­tu­ally advanced. This is not quite cor­rect, since these pupils are not advanced, but are rather more gif­ted than aver­age. The cog­nit­ive skills curve rises until the age of 25 and then stag­nates. In the case of HIPs, levels stag­nate at above-aver­age levels. The word “sur­doué” in French sug­gests that someone is ‘too’ gif­ted. People whose high intel­li­gence ends up caus­ing social prob­lems and mis­align­ments. But this is not the case. In Canada, we use the term “dou­ance” a lot, which is close to “gif­ted­ness.” The term “zebra” was coined by psy­cho­lo­gist Jeanne Siaud-Fac­chin, but is nev­er used in sci­ence. On social net­works, the word is used to describe a mix­ture of hyper­sens­it­iv­ity, anxi­ety, and emo­tion­al dif­fi­culties, which does not cor­res­pond to the defin­i­tion of high intel­lec­tu­al potential.

“The IQ test is the only way to know if someone is HIP”: uncertain

In research, the most com­mon defin­i­tion is the IQ test. How­ever, some research­ers con­sider this meth­od inad­equate and pro­pose oth­er mod­els. Joseph Ren­zulli, an Amer­ic­an psy­cho­lo­gist, for example, cre­ated the three-ring mod­el. Spe­cial­ists agree that high poten­tials are people who could achieve great things in the intel­lec­tu­al sphere, and that intel­li­gence in the sense of IQ is a cent­ral ele­ment. The ques­tion is which per­son­al­ity traits devel­op this poten­tial. Joseph Ren­zulli adds two oth­er com­pon­ents: cre­ativ­ity, because you need to be cap­able of com­ing up with ori­gin­al ideas, and motiv­a­tion, which he calls com­mit­ment to the task. In his view, if you can’t work long and hard on the same sub­ject, you can’t bring about a cul­tur­al revolu­tion. This mod­el is sound, but these com­pon­ents remain dif­fi­cult to meas­ure, accord­ing to Nic­olas Gauvrit.

“HIPs face more difficulties than others”: false

There is still a cer­tain ste­reo­type accord­ing to which an HIP per­son is patho­lo­gic­ally out of step with oth­ers who are more anxious or sens­it­ive. But on this point, sci­entif­ic research is clear: it’s not true. Many stud­ies and data show that HIPs are no worse off than oth­ers. Nic­olas Gauv­rit and his col­leagues were able to study data on a sample of 260,000 people, pay­ing atten­tion to all kinds of dis­orders or dif­fi­culties. In gen­er­al, there is no dif­fer­ence between high poten­tials and oth­ers. When there is, it is usu­ally in favour of the HIP. High poten­tial can be seen as a strength, because intel­li­gence is a resource for over­com­ing life’s dif­fi­culties. Some­times being out of step with oth­ers can lead to com­plic­a­tions. Stud­ies show that the strength con­ferred by HIP out­weighs the difficulties.

What is hypersensitivity?

Sens­it­iv­ity is a per­son­al­ity trait that does not neces­sar­ily char­ac­ter­ise HIP people. Sens­it­ive people react more to stim­uli, wheth­er emo­tion­al or phys­ic­al. This can take the form of noti­cing small changes in the envir­on­ment or react­ing intensely to art, for example. Every­one is at a high­er or lower level of sensitivity.

The term “hyper­sens­it­ive” is used to describe people who are at the top of the sens­it­iv­ity scale. And this has both pos­it­ive and neg­at­ive aspects. On the one hand, these indi­vidu­als are more attent­ive; on the oth­er, their emo­tions are more intense and can be more dif­fi­cult to man­age. At the same time, hyper­sens­it­ive people are bet­ter able to under­stand their emo­tions. So, hyper­sens­it­iv­ity is not a dis­order, but stat­ist­ic­ally it is asso­ci­ated with more emo­tion­al dif­fi­culties – it’s a risk factor.

What’s more, hyper­sens­it­iv­ity is a dif­fer­ent per­son­al­ity trait from emo­tion­al­ity. Sens­it­iv­ity favours emo­tion­al­ity, but it is pos­sible to be sens­it­ive and know how to man­age strong emo­tions. Poor emo­tion­al man­age­ment is inde­pend­ent of hyper­sens­it­iv­ity. In fact, hyper­sens­it­ive people gen­er­ally man­age their emo­tions bet­ter. Like oth­er per­son­al­ity traits, sens­it­iv­ity can be measured.

“High intellectual potential is an invention”: false

There is a counter-legend that high poten­tials are noth­ing spe­cial, that they are a hol­low inven­tion, but this is not true. IQ is a con­tinuum: there’s not much dif­fer­ence between an IQ of 125 and 135, and it may seem arbit­rary to set the threshold at 130. How­ever, the dif­fer­ence does exist. This is com­par­able to height: if we say that people over 1m95 are “very tall”, this may seem arbit­rary for people who are 1m93. How­ever, it would be wrong to say that people meas­ur­ing 1m95 are noth­ing spe­cial. They are more likely to be seen in the under­ground, and they bump into each oth­er more often. So, there is indeed a dif­fer­ence, which can some­times lead to a feel­ing of being out of place – which is per­fectly manageable.

“HIPs have particular personality traits”: uncertain

There are no per­son­al­ity traits that can be used to detect high intel­lec­tu­al poten­tial. How­ever, of the five major per­son­al­ity traits tra­di­tion­ally con­sidered in psy­cho­logy (i.e. Open­ness, Con­scien­tious­ness, Extro­ver­sion, Agree­able­ness, Neur­oticism), only one dis­tin­guishes them from the oth­ers: open­ness. This term cov­ers curi­os­ity, but also the desire to dis­cov­er new things, intel­lec­tu­al open­ness, a taste for the ima­gin­ary, the abil­ity to under­stand dif­fer­ent mor­al val­ues, etc. On aver­age, HIPs have high­er scores on this per­son­al­ity trait. For the oth­er four main traits (extro­ver­sion, agree­able­ness, neur­oticism and con­scien­tious­ness), there is no sig­ni­fic­ant difference.

“You need to know if you are an HIP”: false

It is not at all neces­sary to know that you are intel­lec­tu­ally more gif­ted than aver­age. In fact, many psy­cho­lo­gists are very cau­tious and do not rush to the test when in doubt. You have to con­sider the effects on the indi­vidu­al of a pos­it­ive or neg­at­ive test. You can be dev­ast­ated when you think you are and you’re not. On the oth­er hand, once you’ve been dia­gnosed, you can start to explain everything in this way. So there is a risk, and it’s bet­ter to know what the answer is going to be used for. For example, it can be use­ful for an adult who wants to move towards a more intel­lec­tu­al career. As far as chil­dren are con­cerned, it may be more import­ant to know if there are prob­lems at school, or if there are plans to skip a grade. How­ever, even in these cases, it is not abso­lutely neces­sary. It is more of an indic­a­tion, but the French Min­istry of Edu­ca­tion spe­cifies that the fact of being an HIP is neither a pre­con­di­tion nor an auto­mat­ic reas­on for mov­ing up a grade.

Interview by Sirine Azouaoui

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate