Home / Chroniques / HPI, gifted, zebra: what’s the scientific reality behind these French terms?
small beautiful girl in a school uniform against the background of a classroom, education, learning, child, kid, schoolgirl, student, pupil, smart person, portrait, face, knowledge, children, smiling
©Julia Zarubina, Adobe Stock
π Health and biotech π Society π Neuroscience

HPI, gifted, zebra : what’s the scientific reality behind these French terms ?

Nicolas Gauvrit
Nicolas Gauvrit
Lecturer in Cognitive sciences at Université de Lille
Key takeaways
  • The most commonly used definition of the term HIP, often used in France, describes a person with above-average intellectual ability, i.e. an IQ above 130.
  • A number of other terms (zebra, gifted, precocious, etc.) are sometimes used in French, but their respective definitions do not relate to high intellectual potential.
  • A persistent stereotype of HIP people is that they are more unhappy and anxious than others, but scientific studies refute this idea.
  • One of the only personality traits exacerbated in HIP people is openness, which encompasses curiosity, imagination and an understanding of different moral values.
  • Diagnosing an HIP is not imperative: in some cases it is useful and sheds light on a situation, but sometimes the verdict becomes – wrongly – an explanation for everything.

In recent years, dis­cus­sions and debates about high intel­lec­tual poten­tial (“HIP”) have gar­ne­red a great deal of atten­tion. The phe­no­me­non has even become par­ti­cu­lar­ly popu­lar with the broad­cast on TF1 of a series of the same name (HPI) fea­tu­ring an inves­ti­ga­tor with above-ave­rage intel­lec­tual abi­li­ties. With this gro­wing inter­est, tests are mul­ti­plying to find out whe­ther or not you are HIP. The sub­ject has almost become a fad, which inevi­ta­bly brings with it its share of fan­ta­sies. Howe­ver, the term HIP encom­passes a scien­ti­fic reality.

“High intellectual potential is defined by an above-average intelligence quotient”: true

High intel­lec­tual poten­tial is defi­ned by an intel­li­gence quo­tient (IQ) above 130, with the ave­rage IQ being bet­ween 90 and 110. HIPs are in the top 2.3% in terms of IQ. This is the most com­mon defi­ni­tion. The term HIP empha­sises the fact that this is a poten­tia­li­ty. It means that the per­son has the abi­li­ty to achieve great things in the intel­lec­tual sphere. Howe­ver, this does not neces­sa­ri­ly mean that they will, as other fac­tors come into play. The scien­ti­fic lite­ra­ture some­times pre­fers the term high intel­li­gence quo­tient (IQ), which has the advan­tage of being pure­ly descriptive.

“Zebra, HIP, gifted, precocious all mean the same thing”: false

Dif­ferent words are used to des­cribe high intel­lec­tual poten­tial, and they cover dif­ferent defi­ni­tions. “Pre­co­cious” is the term used by the French Minis­try of Edu­ca­tion, refer­ring to a per­son who is intel­lec­tual­ly advan­ced. This is not quite cor­rect, since these pupils are not advan­ced, but are rather more gif­ted than ave­rage. The cog­ni­tive skills curve rises until the age of 25 and then stag­nates. In the case of HIPs, levels stag­nate at above-ave­rage levels. The word “sur­doué” in French sug­gests that someone is ‘too’ gif­ted. People whose high intel­li­gence ends up cau­sing social pro­blems and misa­li­gn­ments. But this is not the case. In Cana­da, we use the term “douance” a lot, which is close to “gif­ted­ness.” The term “zebra” was coi­ned by psy­cho­lo­gist Jeanne Siaud-Fac­chin, but is never used in science. On social net­works, the word is used to des­cribe a mix­ture of hyper­sen­si­ti­vi­ty, anxie­ty, and emo­tio­nal dif­fi­cul­ties, which does not cor­res­pond to the defi­ni­tion of high intel­lec­tual potential.

“The IQ test is the only way to know if someone is HIP”: uncertain

In research, the most com­mon defi­ni­tion is the IQ test. Howe­ver, some resear­chers consi­der this method inade­quate and pro­pose other models. Joseph Ren­zul­li, an Ame­ri­can psy­cho­lo­gist, for example, crea­ted the three-ring model. Spe­cia­lists agree that high poten­tials are people who could achieve great things in the intel­lec­tual sphere, and that intel­li­gence in the sense of IQ is a cen­tral ele­ment. The ques­tion is which per­so­na­li­ty traits deve­lop this poten­tial. Joseph Ren­zul­li adds two other com­po­nents : crea­ti­vi­ty, because you need to be capable of coming up with ori­gi­nal ideas, and moti­va­tion, which he calls com­mit­ment to the task. In his view, if you can’t work long and hard on the same sub­ject, you can’t bring about a cultu­ral revo­lu­tion. This model is sound, but these com­po­nents remain dif­fi­cult to mea­sure, accor­ding to Nico­las Gauvrit.

“HIPs face more difficulties than others”: false

There is still a cer­tain ste­reo­type accor­ding to which an HIP per­son is patho­lo­gi­cal­ly out of step with others who are more anxious or sen­si­tive. But on this point, scien­ti­fic research is clear : it’s not true. Many stu­dies and data show that HIPs are no worse off than others. Nico­las Gau­vrit and his col­leagues were able to stu­dy data on a sample of 260,000 people, paying atten­tion to all kinds of disor­ders or dif­fi­cul­ties. In gene­ral, there is no dif­fe­rence bet­ween high poten­tials and others. When there is, it is usual­ly in favour of the HIP. High poten­tial can be seen as a strength, because intel­li­gence is a resource for over­co­ming life’s dif­fi­cul­ties. Some­times being out of step with others can lead to com­pli­ca­tions. Stu­dies show that the strength confer­red by HIP out­weighs the difficulties.

What is hypersensitivity ?

Sen­si­ti­vi­ty is a per­so­na­li­ty trait that does not neces­sa­ri­ly cha­rac­te­rise HIP people. Sen­si­tive people react more to sti­mu­li, whe­ther emo­tio­nal or phy­si­cal. This can take the form of noti­cing small changes in the envi­ron­ment or reac­ting inten­se­ly to art, for example. Eve­ryone is at a higher or lower level of sensitivity.

The term “hyper­sen­si­tive” is used to des­cribe people who are at the top of the sen­si­ti­vi­ty scale. And this has both posi­tive and nega­tive aspects. On the one hand, these indi­vi­duals are more atten­tive ; on the other, their emo­tions are more intense and can be more dif­fi­cult to manage. At the same time, hyper­sen­si­tive people are bet­ter able to unders­tand their emo­tions. So, hyper­sen­si­ti­vi­ty is not a disor­der, but sta­tis­ti­cal­ly it is asso­cia­ted with more emo­tio­nal dif­fi­cul­ties – it’s a risk factor.

What’s more, hyper­sen­si­ti­vi­ty is a dif­ferent per­so­na­li­ty trait from emo­tio­na­li­ty. Sen­si­ti­vi­ty favours emo­tio­na­li­ty, but it is pos­sible to be sen­si­tive and know how to manage strong emo­tions. Poor emo­tio­nal mana­ge­ment is inde­pendent of hyper­sen­si­ti­vi­ty. In fact, hyper­sen­si­tive people gene­ral­ly manage their emo­tions bet­ter. Like other per­so­na­li­ty traits, sen­si­ti­vi­ty can be measured.

“High intellectual potential is an invention”: false

There is a coun­ter-legend that high poten­tials are nothing spe­cial, that they are a hol­low inven­tion, but this is not true. IQ is a conti­nuum : there’s not much dif­fe­rence bet­ween an IQ of 125 and 135, and it may seem arbi­tra­ry to set the thre­shold at 130. Howe­ver, the dif­fe­rence does exist. This is com­pa­rable to height : if we say that people over 1m95 are “very tall”, this may seem arbi­tra­ry for people who are 1m93. Howe­ver, it would be wrong to say that people mea­su­ring 1m95 are nothing spe­cial. They are more like­ly to be seen in the under­ground, and they bump into each other more often. So, there is indeed a dif­fe­rence, which can some­times lead to a fee­ling of being out of place – which is per­fect­ly manageable.

“HIPs have particular personality traits”: uncertain

There are no per­so­na­li­ty traits that can be used to detect high intel­lec­tual poten­tial. Howe­ver, of the five major per­so­na­li­ty traits tra­di­tio­nal­ly consi­de­red in psy­cho­lo­gy (i.e. Open­ness, Conscien­tious­ness, Extro­ver­sion, Agreea­ble­ness, Neu­ro­ti­cism), only one dis­tin­guishes them from the others : open­ness. This term covers curio­si­ty, but also the desire to dis­co­ver new things, intel­lec­tual open­ness, a taste for the ima­gi­na­ry, the abi­li­ty to unders­tand dif­ferent moral values, etc. On ave­rage, HIPs have higher scores on this per­so­na­li­ty trait. For the other four main traits (extro­ver­sion, agreea­ble­ness, neu­ro­ti­cism and conscien­tious­ness), there is no signi­fi­cant difference.

“You need to know if you are an HIP”: false

It is not at all neces­sa­ry to know that you are intel­lec­tual­ly more gif­ted than ave­rage. In fact, many psy­cho­lo­gists are very cau­tious and do not rush to the test when in doubt. You have to consi­der the effects on the indi­vi­dual of a posi­tive or nega­tive test. You can be devas­ta­ted when you think you are and you’re not. On the other hand, once you’ve been diag­no­sed, you can start to explain eve­ry­thing in this way. So there is a risk, and it’s bet­ter to know what the ans­wer is going to be used for. For example, it can be use­ful for an adult who wants to move towards a more intel­lec­tual career. As far as chil­dren are concer­ned, it may be more impor­tant to know if there are pro­blems at school, or if there are plans to skip a grade. Howe­ver, even in these cases, it is not abso­lu­te­ly neces­sa­ry. It is more of an indi­ca­tion, but the French Minis­try of Edu­ca­tion spe­ci­fies that the fact of being an HIP is nei­ther a pre­con­di­tion nor an auto­ma­tic rea­son for moving up a grade.

Interview by Sirine Azouaoui

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate