Home / Chroniques / Pandemic positives: 7% less CO2 emissions in 2020
π Planet

Pandemic positives: 7% less CO2 emissions in 2020

Cyril Crevoisier
Cyril Crevoisier
CNRS Research Director at the Dynamic Meteorology Laboratory (LMD*) at the École Polytechnique (IP Paris)

NB: Ini­tial­ly, the title of this col­umn stat­ed the fig­ure 8%. Since this arti­cle was writ­ten, the 8% glob­al CO2 emis­sions in 2020 has been re-eval­u­at­ed at 7%.

Before the pan­dem­ic we were on a worst-case sce­nario tra­jec­to­ry in terms of green­house gas emis­sions. Accord­ing to the Inter­gov­ern­men­tal Pan­el on Cli­mate Change (IPCC) 1, we need to pre­vent a glob­al tem­per­a­ture rise of 2°C if we are to avert irre­versible envi­ron­men­tal changes. We are cur­rent­ly set to face an increase of twice that: 4°C. The pan­dem­ic and lock­down restric­tions around the world rep­re­sent­ed a sig­nif­i­cant change in the inter­ac­tions between humans and the envi­ron­ment. My team stud­ies atmos­pher­ic com­po­si­tion and cli­mate using obser­va­tions from both ground sta­tions and satel­lites, which explains why we were rapid­ly called upon when pan­dem­ic became global.

Depend­ing on the type of gas or par­ti­cle we are refer­ring to, the observed effect of the pan­dem­ic is dif­fer­ent. Anthro­pogenic green­house gas­es like car­bon diox­ide (CO2) and methane (CH4) stay in the atmos­phere for around 100 and 10 years, respec­tive­ly. So it is dif­fi­cult to reli­ably mea­sure changes over a rel­a­tive­ly short time span. How­ev­er, high­ly reac­tive species and pol­lu­tant par­ti­cles found in the air have much short­er lifes­pans, and we did see big changes there. For exam­ple, we observed a 30% reduc­tion in ultra­fine par­ti­cles around Paris in com­par­i­son to the same peri­od over the last 10 years. More­over, obser­va­tions from the Euro­pean satel­lite, Sen­tinel-5P, revealed a decrease of over 50% NO2 – an indi­ca­tor of fos­sil fuel emis­sions – in Euro­pean megac­i­ties dur­ing Spring.

How­ev­er, to speak of a pos­i­tive impact of the lock­down on cli­mate is actu­al­ly more com­pli­cat­ed to answer than it would seem. If we look at the green­house gas­es present in the atmos­phere, we actu­al­ly don’t see much change. But this is not the best way to mea­sure effects of human activ­i­ty over short time­frames; atmos­pher­ic con­cen­tra­tions of CO2 can be masked by plant activ­i­ty across the world. Instead, we mea­sured emis­sions based on ener­gy demand and in doing so we saw a sig­nif­i­cant decrease in CO2 released into the atmos­phere. In April 2020, glob­al CO2 emis­sions were 17% low­er than last year – equiv­a­lent to 17 mega­tons of CO2 per day. And esti­ma­tions for 2020 over­all say that CO2 emis­sions were 8% less than in 2019. 

How­ev­er, when you look at the green­house gas­es in the atmos­phere, you don’t real­ly see a change.

This 8% reduc­tion in CO2 emis­sions dur­ing the pan­dem­ic is great news for the plan­et. But it is worth not­ing that this only real­ly takes us back to 2016 lev­els – car­bon emis­sions dras­ti­cal­ly increased between 2016–2019. To respect the 2015 Paris Agree­ment, we need to reduce green­house gas emis­sions by 8% per year 2. The effect of the glob­al pan­dem­ic and large-scale lock­down peri­ods is proof that the cli­mate goal is, in the­o­ry, achievable. 

Nev­er­the­less, the mea­sures have been dras­tic. The eco­nom­ic and social con­straints result­ing from the pan­dem­ic are unsus­tain­able over the long-term. ‚These results do, how­ev­er, pro­vide use with an indi­ca­tion of where we should focus our efforts. That is to say by point­ing out the glob­al sec­tors where the biggest changes can be made if we are to effec­tive­ly reduce green­house gas emis­sions. We saw, for exam­ple, a 75% reduc­tion in the avi­a­tion indus­try. But avi­a­tion is only respon­si­ble for 2–3% of glob­al green­house gas emis­sions so it is not nec­es­sar­i­ly the indus­try that is like­ly to have the biggest over­all impact. 

If we turn our atten­tion to the ener­gy sec­tor, we see that it is respon­si­ble for 44% of glob­al green­house gas emis­sions. And dur­ing the first lock­down in 2020 we saw a 6% reduc­tion in emis­sions due to low­er ener­gy demand. Anoth­er impor­tant sec­tor is ground trans­port. Almost 50% of the reduc­tion in emis­sions dur­ing the lock­down can be attrib­uted to reduced sur­face traf­fic. So, the ener­gy and road trans­port sec­tors are areas we should be pay­ing atten­tion to. 

Nev­er­the­less, there is a risk that polit­i­cal deci­sions involv­ing envi­ron­men­tal issues, or “green deals”, shift out of view whilst the world focus­es on restart­ing the econ­o­my. But the cli­mate cri­sis is not going away just because there is a health cri­sis. We should do every­thing to avoid turn­ing our back on cli­mate-relat­ed polit­i­cal decisions. 

If we look at the evo­lu­tion of CO2 emis­sions in rela­tion to pre­vi­ous eco­nom­ic crises such as the ‘Cred­it Crunch’ in 2008 the pat­tern is unset­tling. In every case we see that once the econ­o­my recov­ers, CO2 emis­sions return to their orig­i­nal tra­jec­to­ry – or more. This means that by 2021 or 2022, we are like­ly to have erased the envi­ron­men­tal ben­e­fit of the pan­dem­ic. We must stay vig­i­lant by focus­ing on new solu­tions glob­al­ly and there are many options. We should be focus­ing on spe­cif­ic sec­tors such as ener­gy and trans­port, but also invest in bio­mass ener­gy, and car­bon cap­ture and stor­age by plant­i­ng trees and devel­op­ing more advance tech­no­log­i­cal solu­tions. The next ten years real­ly count. 



Cyril Crevoisier

Cyril Crevoisier

CNRS Research Director at the Dynamic Meteorology Laboratory (LMD*) at the École Polytechnique (IP Paris)

Cyril Crevoisier and his team study atmospheric climate variables, and greenhouse gases in particular, using spatial and airborne observations. He is a Research director at the CNRS, and head of the "Atmosphere, biosphere and climate by remote sensing" team at the Dynamic Meteorology Laboratory (*LMD: a joint research unit of CNRS, École Polytechnique - Institut Polytechnique de Paris, ENS, Sorbonne University). He also chairs the Scientific Committee for Earth Sciences at the National Center for Space Studies (CNES).

Our world explained with science. Every week, in your inbox.

Get the newsletter