AdobeStock_782786951
π Space π Science and technology
Satellites, black holes, exoplanets: when science extends beyond our planet

How can we detect life on distant planets ?

with Julien de Wit, Associate Professor of Planetary Sciences at MIT and Amaury Triaud , Professor of Exoplanetology at University of Birmingham
On May 21st, 2024 |
3 min reading time
de Julien de Wit
Julien de Wit
Associate Professor of Planetary Sciences at MIT
Amaury Triaud
Amaury Triaud
Professor of Exoplanetology at University of Birmingham
Key takeaways
  • Usually, it is by detecting certain chemical compounds in the atmosphere that allows exoplanets to be identified.
  • A new approach is being considered: looking for a low concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere of exoplanets.
  • On Earth, most of the CO2 has been dissolved in the oceans and then buried in the Earth's crust. A small proportion of atmospheric CO2 would therefore be a chemical “signature” of the presence of water.
  • This method could be facilitated by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope.
  • The ultimate goal: to determine whether the surface conditions on exoplanets are similar to those on Earth, so that we can look for signs of life.

Could loo­king for the absence rather than the pre­sence of cer­tain che­mi­cal com­pounds in the atmos­phere of exo­pla­nets (pla­nets orbi­ting stars other than the Sun) be our best chance of fin­ding liquid water – and the­re­fore per­haps even life – on these far-off worlds ?

This is what resear­chers from the MIT and the Uni­ver­si­ty of Bir­min­gham are pro­po­sing, having shown that if an extra­so­lar ter­res­trial (rocky) pla­net has much less car­bon dioxide (CO2) in its atmos­phere com­pa­red to that of other pla­nets in the same solar sys­tem, this could indi­cate the pre­sence of liquid water on the sur­face of that pla­net. Such a che­mi­cal “signa­ture” should be rea­di­ly detec­table with NASA’s James Webb Space Teles­cope (JWST), some­thing that has not been the case with other obser­va­to­ries and teles­copes until now.

To date, astro­no­mers have dis­co­ve­red more than 5,000 pla­nets out­side our solar sys­tem. Ano­ther feat : for more than twen­ty years, they have been able to assess whe­ther a pla­net is in a “habi­table” zone. But they are still unable to deter­mine if it is actual­ly capable of hos­ting life.

In our solar sys­tem, resear­chers detect the pre­sence of liquid oceans, for example, by loo­king for “glints” of sun­light reflec­ted off liquid sur­faces. This is the way they have suc­cee­ded in obser­ving large lakes on Titan, Saturn’s lar­gest moon, for ins­tance. Doing the same for exo­pla­nets will be dif­fi­cult, howe­ver, even with advan­ced teles­copes like the JWST.

Solar systems like ours ?

A team led by Julien de Wit from MIT (USA) and Amau­ry Triaud from the Uni­ver­si­ty of Bir­min­gham (UK) has now applied what we know about the CO2 levels in the atmos­pheres of the ter­res­trial pla­nets in our own solar sys­tem to exo­pla­nets. On Earth, most of the CO2 in our atmos­phere has been dis­sol­ved into the oceans and has gra­dual­ly been buried in the Ear­th’s crust (over very long geo­lo­gi­cal times­cales). Our pla­net is the­re­fore very dif­ferent from Venus, whose atmos­phere contains over 95% CO2. Earth contains as much CO2 as Venus, but this CO2 can­not be “seen”, which shows just how effi­cient the pro­cess of CO2 sto­rage in the Ear­th’s crust has been.

“We pro­pose that a simi­lar pro­cess on exo­pla­nets would enable astro­no­mers to deduce that there is liquid water on them,” explains Amau­ry Triaud. “Such pla­nets would appear poo­rer in atmos­phe­ric CO2 com­pa­red to their non-habi­table neighbors.”

The stra­te­gy the resear­chers pro­pose would work best for solar sys­tems like our own, that is, those in which seve­ral ter­res­trial pla­nets, all rough­ly the same size, orbit rela­ti­ve­ly close to each other around their host star. This is the case for TRAPPIST‑1, a seven-pla­net sys­tem loca­ted 40 light years from Earth – which is rela­ti­ve­ly close in astro­no­mi­cal terms.

First, they would confirm that the pla­nets indeed pos­sess an atmos­phere. To do this, the experts would look for the pre­sence of CO2 using the JWST, the only teles­cope cur­rent­ly capable of mea­su­ring the che­mi­cal content of the atmos­phere of rocky exo­pla­nets. CO2 stron­gly absorbs light in the infra­red part of the elec­tro­ma­gne­tic spec­trum and could the­re­fore be easi­ly detec­ted by the teles­cope. Next, they would com­pare the CO2 content of the dif­ferent pla­nets in the sys­tem to deter­mine whe­ther any of them has signi­fi­cant­ly less CO2 than the others. Sub­sequent obser­va­tions would confirm how impor­tant this defi­cit is, but also whe­ther it is due to bio­lo­gy (bio­mass burying the car­bon) or by geo­lo­gy (CO2 dis­sol­ving into water).

Earth-like conditions on distant worlds ?

As we dis­co­ver more and more exo­pla­nets, it’s not just impor­tant to find out whe­ther their size and mass are simi­lar to those of Earth. We would also like to know whe­ther the condi­tions on their sur­faces are also simi­lar. “By mea­su­ring redu­ced amounts of CO2 on neigh­bo­ring pla­nets in an extra­so­lar sys­tem, we would be more cer­tain that those pla­nets have sur­face condi­tions simi­lar to Earth’s, before ini­tia­ting the search for evi­dence of bio­lo­gi­cal acti­vi­ty itself,” explains Amau­ry Triaud.

“The Holy Grail in exo­pla­net science is to find habi­table worlds other than Earth and signs of life,” adds Julien de Wit. “To this end, the field has tra­di­tio­nal­ly focu­sed on loo­king for an addi­tio­nal signal coming from a given pla­net : a glint coming from oceans or the absorp­tion signa­ture of a spe­ci­fic gas (oxy­gen, for example). But all such fea­tures have so far been beyond the reach of even the newest observatories.”

“Here, we make the very impor­tant point that it is not just about loo­king for what has been added by life or the pre­sence of water, but also (and per­haps more impor­tant­ly) about what has been remo­ved by life or the pre­sence of water,” he adds. “It is only by exa­mi­ning the ‘nega­tive space’ (the deple­tion) crea­ted by one or the other that we can enable the search for habi­tats and life with cur­rent tech­no­lo­gy (that is, within the next few years for a sys­tem like TRAPPIST‑1). That’s how power­ful that simple change in definition/perspective is.”

The resear­chers say they will also conti­nue to search for rocky tem­pe­rate worlds other than those in TRAPPIST‑1 that they could point the JWST towards. “For that, our teles­copes in Chile, the Cana­ry Islands and Mexi­co, a net­work cal­led SPECULOOS, are essen­tial. Indeed, these teles­copes are alrea­dy star­ting to find new rocky exo­pla­nets,” they reveal.

Interview by Isabelle Dumé

Refe­rences :

Atmos­phe­ric car­bon deple­tion as a tra­cer of water oceans and bio­mass on tem­pe­rate ter­res­trial exo­pla­nets, Nature Asto­no­my 8 17–29 (2024)

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate