π Space
Conquering Mars: realistic venture or a fantasy?

Voyage to Mars : myth or reality ?

with Pierre Henriquet, Doctor in Nuclear Physics and Columnist at Polytechnique Insights
On May 10th, 2023 |
4 min reading time
Pierre Henriquet
Pierre Henriquet
Doctor in Nuclear Physics and Columnist at Polytechnique Insights
Key takeaways
  • There are many constraints on the possibility of going to Mars, and living there, in the near future.
  • Radiation protection is a problem, because on Mars humans no longer benefit from the Earth's magnetic field, which deflects part of the cosmic rays.
  • Although new innovations have made it easier to provide food and water, it is still difficult to make them work over long periods.
  • Bone decalcification must also be considered because in space, astronauts lose an average of 1% of their bone mass per month.
  • A final point concerns the astronauts' mental state: no one can predict how they will react to the idea that no return to Earth is possible.

Who has never drea­med of loo­king over the sur­face of Mars from the top of Olym­pus Mons, the highest moun­tain in the Solar Sys­tem ? Who wouldn’t want to admire the blue sun­sets on the Red Pla­net at least once in their lifetime ?

If the jour­ney bet­ween Earth and Mars is some­times no more than a page-tur­ner in a science fic­tion novel, it is a dif­ferent sto­ry in real life. Com­plex, dan­ge­rous, uto­pian, sui­ci­dal… there is no shor­tage of adverts from pri­vate com­pa­nies pro­mi­sing the first man (or woman) on Mars by the end of the decade.

What are the obs­tacles to the explo­ra­tion (dare we say, colo­ni­sa­tion) of Mars ? Why aren’t we alrea­dy reser­ving our living space near the slopes of Valles Mari­ne­ris ? Let’s take a look…

“It’s not the destination that’s important, it’s the journey” they used to say…

Unfor­tu­na­te­ly, the pro­blems will not start once we arrive on Mars, but long before. At present, humans have never gone fur­ther than the lunar orbit, 3 or 4 days away from our pla­net. And even in these cases, if there is the sligh­test pro­blem on board, or if no more com­mands respond, the immu­table laws of space mecha­nics always manage to bring the ship back to Earth by itself. This is what hap­pe­ned on 14 April 1970 when a liquid oxy­gen tank explo­ded in the Apol­lo 13 ser­vice module, ending the mis­sion. After three days of sur­vi­val in a rip­ped open spa­ce­craft, the astro­nauts were able to return safe­ly to Earth.

Unfor­tu­na­te­ly, a sce­na­rio like this is unthin­kable during a trans­fer bet­ween Mars and Earth. This jour­ney would last bet­ween 6 and 9 months, during which time the spa­ce­craft would become a tru­ly auto­no­mous world, capable of pro­vi­ding water, oxy­gen and food to a crew sub­jec­ted to an envi­ron­ment far more hos­tile than any­thing ever simu­la­ted or experienced.

Protecting, feeding, watering

In addi­tion to com­mu­ni­ca­tions, which will become lon­ger as the dis­tance bet­ween the spa­ce­craft and the control centre increases, even­tual­ly rea­ching more than 10 minutes bet­ween the trans­mis­sion and recep­tion of a mes­sage, one of the main pro­blems concerns cos­mic rays, the flow of ener­ge­tic par­ticles (pro­tons, elec­trons, hea­vy ato­mic nuclei) that bathe inter­pla­ne­ta­ry space, irra­dia­ting all objects in it. Although there are space envi­ron­ments that today allow humans to train for long stays in space, such as the Inter­na­tio­nal Space Sta­tion (ISS), the situa­tion is not the same. The ISS rotates at an alti­tude of 400 km, and in these condi­tions it bene­fits great­ly from the pro­tec­tive shiel­ding effect of the Ear­th’s magne­tic field (the magne­tos­phere), which slows down and deflects a frac­tion of cos­mic rays.

Will huma­ni­ty ever live in orbit around Mars ? (Cre­dit : James Vaughan).

And radia­tion pro­tec­tion is just one of the many pro­blems that will have to be sol­ved before sen­ding humans to Mars. As for water, a lot of work has been done on the ISS and there is now a very effi­cient sys­tem that recycles urine and even reco­vers the water vapour emit­ted by brea­thing and pers­pi­ra­tion to fil­ter it and make drin­king water. But even so, losses are inevi­table, and the car­go ships that leave for the ISS eve­ry month always bring some water for refuelling.

As far as food is concer­ned, the pro­blem is far from being sol­ved. It is impos­sible, for example, to car­ry 12 to 18 months’ worth of pro­vi­sions in a trai­ler behind the spa­ce­craft (assu­ming that the crew is not aban­do­ned without the pos­si­bi­li­ty of retur­ning, in which case the amount to be car­ried can be halved).

Howe­ver, there is still some research to find solu­tions on the ISS. Since 2019, the BioNutrients‑1 (then 2) expe­riment has been stu­dying the func­tio­ning of cer­tain yeasts and bac­te­ria that have been gene­ti­cal­ly modi­fied to pro­duce antioxi­dants, vita­min A or pro­teins to main­tain the astro­nauts’ muscle mass. With the pro­gress of gene edi­ting, it is not unrea­lis­tic to ima­gine, in the long term, micro-orga­nisms capable, for example, of brea­king down human faeces into simple mole­cules, and others pro­gram­med to use this ele­men­ta­ry soup to pro­duce pro­teins, fats, fibres and other consu­mable car­bo­hy­drates – and to be able to recycle, this time, some of the human solid matter.

What are the effects on the human body ?

Ano­ther well-known pro­blem of the space envi­ron­ment on the human body is the decal­ci­fi­ca­tion of bones. This phe­no­me­non can be slo­wed down by a sui­table diet and dai­ly exer­cise, but this loss is inevi­table (1% of bone mass lost per month). Here again, a solu­tion could come from bio­tech­no­lo­gy. The idea is to use the vege­tables pro­du­ced inside the ves­sel in the most effi­cient and ver­sa­tile way pos­sible. In addi­tion to pro­du­cing a lit­tle oxy­gen by consu­ming CO2 and ser­ving as human food, it is also envi­sa­ged that they could be used as a… pharmacy.

In space, astro­nauts lose 1% of their bone mass per month.

In 2022, a Uni­ver­si­ty of Cali­for­nia stu­dy was publi­shed on the growth in space of a gene­ti­cal­ly modi­fied let­tuce that pro­duces some human para­thy­roid hor­mone, which, among other things, helps sti­mu­late bone growth. Dai­ly consump­tion of this let­tuce could even­tual­ly help astro­nauts main­tain their bone den­si­ty during long space tra­vel. We can then ima­gine having a pro­gram­mable plant phar­ma­co­poeia inside the spa­ce­craft, edi­ted as nee­ded, without having to take a whole phar­ma­cy with us on take-off.

Final­ly, the human fac­tor is also a very sen­si­tive para­me­ter that does not neces­sa­ri­ly gua­ran­tee the suc­cess of a hypo­the­ti­cal mis­sion to Mars. A lot of research is cur­rent­ly being car­ried out on the abi­li­ty of a small group of pseu­do-astro­nauts to remain alone, living in pro­mis­cui­ty 24 hours a day without the pos­si­bi­li­ty of chan­ging any­thing. But these stu­dies also have their limits because they take place in envi­ron­ments that are cer­tain­ly iso­la­ted, but which remain on Earth. The know­ledge that there is no way back and that all of huma­ni­ty is behind you is impos­sible to simulate.

Few scien­tists doubt that Mars is fore­ver out of reach. But that doesn’t make the trip rea­dy for tomor­row. Although inten­sive work is cur­rent­ly being done to pre­pare man­kind for the first inter­pla­ne­ta­ry jour­neys, the cur­rent state of know­ledge and tech­no­lo­gy for making this jour­ney cer­tain­ly does not make it pos­sible to envi­sage it for the near future.

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate