Home / Chroniques / Why the European Central Bank wants to digitize the euro
White Mouse Cable Forming Euro Symbol On Blue Background
π Economics π Digital

Why the European Central Bank wants to digitize the euro

Marc Olivier Strauss-Kahn
Marc-Olivier Strauss-Kahn
Director General of Banque de France (BDF)

[Sum­ma­ry of an article from variances​.eu.]

In mid-2021, the Euro­pean Cen­tral Bank (ECB) is expec­ted to announce a pro­ject for a digi­tal euro to be imple­men­ted within the next 5 years. The Uni­ted States could fol­low with their “digi­tal dol­lar”, but this will be later. There is alrea­dy a lot of talk about this Cen­tral Bank Digi­tal Cur­ren­cy pro­ject. In simple terms : what will this digi­tal euro be, why is the ECB inter­es­ted in it and how will it be implemented ?

What is a Cen­tral Bank Digi­tal Cur­ren­cy (CBDC)?

As a remin­der, only phy­si­cal cash – coins and bank­notes –, cal­led “fidu­cia­ry” money, are issued by the sove­rei­gn autho­ri­ty and are legal ten­der in a coun­try mea­ning they can­not be refu­sed in pay­ment. So-cal­led “scrip­tu­ral” money (part­ly made up of bank depo­sits) is crea­ted by super­vi­sed and regu­la­ted banks and can be trans­fer­red elec­tro­ni­cal­ly. These two forms – fidu­cia­ry and non-cash – toge­ther per­form the three func­tions of money : unit of account, means of pay­ment and store of value (pro­vi­ded that infla­tion remains low).

As such, a CBDC com­bines the advan­tages of these two forms of money. (1) It repre­sents a claim on the cen­tral bank that is as secure as a bank­note (and the­re­fore more secure than a bank depo­sit); (2) It is acces­sible to eve­ryone, like a bank­note (whe­reas cur­rent­ly only banks have an account with the cen­tral bank); (3) But it is elec­tro­nic and can be used remo­te­ly (unlike a bank­note). It is thus at the heart of the dia­gram below.

How would the digi­tal euro dif­fer from Diem or Bitcoin ?

CBDC should not be confu­sed with “sta­ble­coins”, elec­tro­nic assets that are star­ting to be pro­du­ced by the pri­vate sec­tor but are indexed to exis­ting cur­ren­cies. The best-known example of these sta­ble­coins remains the Diem, ini­tial­ly named Libra by Face­book as ear­ly as 2019, but still in the pipe­line. Sta­ble­coins, issued by unsu­per­vi­sed enti­ties, pose risks to mone­ta­ry and finan­cial sta­bi­li­ty (data pro­tec­tion, poten­tial glo­bal oli­go­po­lies, etc.).

CBDC also dif­fers from cryp­to-assets (mis­ta­ken­ly cal­led “cryp­to­cur­ren­cies”), whose value is not based on any exis­ting cur­ren­cy. The value of Bit­coin, the most famous example, is extra­or­di­na­ri­ly vola­tile because it is based on its announ­ced scar­ci­ty (at most 21 mil­lion units) and its increa­sing eco­no­mic and envi­ron­men­tal pro­duc­tion costs. Thus, one Bit­coin tran­sac­tion cur­rent­ly consumes the ener­gy nee­ded for half a mil­lion tran­sac­tions per card. This also limits its sca­la­bi­li­ty, which is essen­tial for a cur­ren­cy. Never­the­less, cryp­to-assets are in demand as spe­cu­la­tive assets, which need to be regu­la­ted 1.

Why digi­tize money ?

On the one hand, to main­tain public control over money crea­tion in the face of pri­vate com­pe­ti­tion. The CBDC pro­vides a com­ple­ment to bank­notes, whose use for tran­sac­tions is decrea­sing (in volume and in value) but whose issued stock is increa­sing (hoar­ding). It is a ques­tion of pro­po­sing a mone­ta­ry asset gua­ran­teed by the State in an uncer­tain digi­ti­zed world. Money is a public good, and the cen­tral bank must offer a risk-free alter­na­tive to digi­ti­zed assets issued by unsu­per­vi­sed pri­vate enti­ties. There is also a geo­po­li­ti­cal dimen­sion : forei­gn digi­tal cur­ren­cies (public or pri­vate) risk des­ta­bi­li­zing, if not crow­ding out, natio­nal cur­ren­cies, as in the case of the « dol­la­ri­za­tion » of deve­lo­ping economies. 

How to desi­gn a digi­tal currency ?

Bet­ween now and the actual digi­ti­za­tion of the euro, various choices still need to be made, nota­bly concer­ning the scope of the public-pri­vate part­ner­ship, the balance bet­ween confi­den­tia­li­ty and com­pliance, and the legal fra­me­work. Trust in the cur­ren­cy is at stake. 

BIS pyra­mid scheme : consu­mer pre­fe­rences (left) cor­res­pond to as many choices to be made by the cen­tral bank (right) 2

The ECB will pro­ba­bly opt for a hybrid archi­tec­ture (red base of the pyra­mid): it will not ful­ly dele­gate the mana­ge­ment of the digi­ti­zed euro to the pri­vate sec­tor but will not direct­ly manage it either. In its 2020 report, it thus explains that “super­vi­sed pri­vate inter­me­dia­ries would be best pla­ced to pro­vide ancil­la­ry ser­vices” and that “a model in which access to the digi­tal euro is inter­me­dia­ted by the pri­vate sec­tor is the­re­fore preferable”.

The ECB must also decide on the issue of the tech­ni­cal infra­struc­ture (yel­low level). This could be cen­tra­li­zed on a single plat­form or use a dis­tri­bu­ted led­ger via a decen­tra­li­zed net­work of com­pu­ters, which may pose a sca­la­bi­li­ty problem. 

The green level cor­res­ponds, in par­ti­cu­lar, to the trade-off bet­ween pri­va­cy pro­tec­tion, favou­red by the choice of a token (like a bea­rer bill), and regu­la­to­ry com­pliance ; the lat­ter could require an account to trace tran­sac­tions, in par­ti­cu­lar to avoid money laun­de­ring or ter­ro­rist financing.

The tip (blue) of the pyra­mid refers to inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty, i.e. the abi­li­ty of the CBDC to link who­le­sale and retail mar­kets by being connec­ted to natio­nal and cross-bor­der pay­ment sys­tems. Thus, the bank­notes are spe­ci­fic to each cur­ren­cy zone, but res­pect glo­bal stan­dards allo­wing them to be exchanged.

Final­ly, and in addi­tion to various tech­ni­cal aspects (cyber risks, offline tran­sac­tions, etc.), legal consi­de­ra­tions need to be cla­ri­fied. These include : the legal basis for digi­tal issuance, the legal impli­ca­tions of dif­ferent for­mats, and the appli­ca­bi­li­ty of cur­ren­cy zone laws to the cen­tral bank as issuer. Without going into detail, a com­bi­na­tion of articles in the Trea­ty on the Func­tio­ning of the Euro­pean Union and the Sta­tute of the Euro­pean Sys­tem of Cen­tral Banks should make this pos­sible, accor­ding to the ECB 2020 Report.

Inno­va­tions have mar­ked the his­to­ry of cur­ren­cies. An MNBC will be ano­ther great step in the “Cash Odys­sey”. The need for cen­tral banks to acce­le­rate the ongoing pro­cess is clear, espe­cial­ly in part­ner­ship with the pri­vate sec­tor. From cryp­to-assets or sta­ble­coins to MNBC pro­jects like the digi­tal euro, a gene­ral prin­ciple always seems to apply : “the pri­vate ini­tiates, the state regu­lates or appropriates”. 

1https://​www​.law​.ox​.ac​.uk/​b​u​s​i​n​e​s​s​-​l​a​w​-​b​l​o​g​/​b​l​o​g​/​2​0​2​0​/​1​1​/​m​a​r​k​e​t​s​-​c​r​y​p​t​o​-​a​s​s​e​t​s​-​r​e​g​u​l​a​t​i​o​n​-​m​i​c​a​-​a​n​d​-​e​u​-​d​i​g​i​t​a​l​-​f​i​n​a​n​c​e​-​s​t​r​ategy
2https://​www​.bis​.org/​p​u​b​l​/​q​t​r​p​d​f​/​r​_​q​t​2​0​0​3​j.htm

Contributors

Marc Olivier Strauss-Kahn

Marc-Olivier Strauss-Kahn

Director General of Banque de France (BDF)

Marc-Olivier Strauss-Kahn is Honorary Director General of the Banque de France (BDF), Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council, teacher and member of private and associative boards, including that of Citéco, Europe's leading economic education museum. In 2001-08 and 2012-17, he was Chief Economist and member of the BDF's Executive Committee, French representative in bodies such as the G20 or the BIS, the OECD and the IMF. He also worked at the latter three institutions, the FED and the IDB. He is a graduate of ESSEC, Sciences Po Paris, and the Universities of the Sorbonne, Nanterre and Chicago.

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate