Home / Chroniques / 4 technologies to enhance sporting performance
close up of woman feet running on track
π Science and technology π Health and biotech

4 technologies to enhance sporting performance

Douglas Powell
Douglas Powell
Director of the Breast Biomechanics Research Center (BBRC) in the College of Health Sciences at the University of Memphis
Donghee Son
Donghee Son
Professor in the School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering at Sungkyunkwan University (South Korea)
Mikyung Shin
Mikyung Shin
Associate professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Sungkyunkwan University (South Korea)
Hailey Fong
Hailey Fong
Researcher at Breast Biomechanics Research Center de l'Université de Memphis (États-Unis)
Jean-Christophe Géminard
Jean-Christophe Géminard
CNRS research director at the Physics Laboratory (ENS Lyon)
Key takeaways
  • A number of technologies are being developed around the world to enhance sporting performance.
  • Research has shown that a good sports bra is important for supporting the breasts and demonstrated how it affects the knee joint during running.
  • The work proves that sports bras, which have changed little over the last 50 years, should be considered as sports equipment in their own right.
  • Insoles fitted with sensors could be used to measure the progress and performance of athletes during various sporting activities.
  • Korean researchers have developed a conductive hydrogel capable of regenerating and reconnecting injured muscle to the nervous system.
  • These and other technologies being developed could help athletes progress and improve their performance.

#1 A good sports bra can increase running performance by 7%

As well as a good pair of run­ning shoes, a well-fit­ting sports bra that effi­cient­ly sup­ports the breasts is impor­tant for female run­ners. It can help reduce breast pain and improve per­for­mance. When the breasts are not pro­per­ly sup­por­ted, the body com­pen­sates by pro­tec­ting them in other ways. This com­pen­sa­tion can reduce run­ning per­for­mance, increase the risk of inju­ry and even lead to back and chest pain.

To bet­ter unders­tand the role of a good sports bra on the bio­me­cha­nics of run­ning, a team of resear­chers led by Dou­glas Powell and Hai­ley Fong from the Breast Bio­me­cha­nics Research Cen­ter at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Mem­phis (USA) stu­died how wea­ring a bra impacts knee joint stiff­ness during exer­cise. This bio­me­cha­ni­cal mea­su­re­ment pro­vides infor­ma­tion on the resis­tance of the knee joint to an applied force. To do this, the resear­chers recrui­ted 12 non-pro­fes­sio­nal female run­ners aged 18–35 and had them wear two dif­ferent sports bras : one with high sup­port and the other with low sup­port. A control group did not wear a bra at all.

Each par­ti­ci­pant ran on a tread­mill equip­ped with force detec­tors for three minutes. The resear­chers fil­med the run­ners using a 10-came­ra motion cap­ture sys­tem. Retro­re­flec­tive mar­kers pla­ced on the run­ners’ bodies also tra­cked their move­ments. The resear­chers then used soft­ware that they had spe­cial­ly deve­lo­ped in this work to cal­cu­late the excur­sions of the knee joint (flexions, exten­sions and rota­tions) on the basis of the images they obtai­ned. They also moni­to­red chest move­ment during the exercise.

The expe­ri­ments revea­led that when breast sup­port was higher, the knee joint was more rigid, thanks to smal­ler joint excur­sions. Com­pa­red with the control group, the low- and high-contain­ment bras increa­sed knee joint stiff­ness by 2% and 5% res­pec­ti­ve­ly. Ove­rall, a high sup­port sports bra appea­red to improve run­ning per­for­mance by 7%. The research also revea­led that impro­ve­ments in run­ning per­for­mance with high sup­port sports bras was stron­gly cor­re­la­ted with breast size : women with lar­ger breasts bene­fi­ted more in terms of run­ning performance.

Over the last 50 years, bra desi­gn has chan­ged lit­tle, explains Dou­glas Powell : “our results, com­bi­ned with those of pre­vious stu­dies, show that sports bras should be consi­de­red not just as appa­rel, but as sports equip­ment in their own right.”12.

#2 3D-printed insoles to assess athletes’ performance

In top-level sport, a frac­tion of a second can make all the dif­fe­rence. Made-to-mea­sure insoles can improve spor­ting per­for­mance and resear­chers at Empa, ETH Zurich and EPFL, all in Swit­zer­land, have deve­lo­ped a device that is much more sophis­ti­ca­ted than a simple insert. The new insole com­prises pres­sure and shear sen­sors that can mea­sure these para­me­ters direct­ly on the sole of the foot during any type of phy­si­cal activity.

“The pres­sures recor­ded can be used to deter­mine whe­ther a per­son is wal­king, run­ning, or clim­bing stairs. It’s even pos­sible to deter­mine whe­ther they’re car­rying a hea­vy load on their back, in which case the pres­sure shifts more towards the heel,” explains Gil­ber­to Siquei­ra, pro­ject lea­der and resear­cher at Empa and ETH’s Com­plex Mate­rials Laboratory.

The soles were fabri­ca­ted using a 3D prin­ter, known as an extru­der. The base of the sole is made from a mix­ture of sili­cone and cel­lu­lose nano­par­ticles. A conduc­tive ink contai­ning sil­ver is then prin­ted atop this first layer. The sen­sors, which are pie­zoe­lec­tric, convert mecha­ni­cal pres­sure into elec­tri­cal signals. These are prin­ted on the conduc­ting part of the sole, where the pres­sure exer­ted by the foot is grea­test. The ensemble is pro­tec­ted by a final layer of sili­cone. An inter­face for rea­ding the signals gene­ra­ted, inser­ted into the sole, com­pletes the device.

As well as Empa, ETH Zurich and EPFL, the Centre Hos­pi­ta­lier Uni­ver­si­taire Vau­dois (CHUV) and the ortho­pe­dics com­pa­ny Numo were also invol­ved in this work. Such insoles could be used by ath­letes to mea­sure their pro­gress during trai­ning and their per­for­mance in gene­ral3.

#3 An electrically conductive hydrogel could help regenerate muscle

Resear­chers at the Ins­ti­tute of Basic Science (IBS) in South Korea have deve­lo­ped a new tis­sue pros­the­sis made from a conduc­tive hydro­gel that can be injec­ted direct­ly into an inju­red muscle to rege­ne­rate it and recon­nect it to the ner­vous sys­tem. This pros­the­sis has enabled rats with torn hind limbs to walk again.

Muscle inju­ries such as strains or tears are com­mon sports inju­ries. When a muscle is torn, its elec­tri­cal com­mu­ni­ca­tion with the ner­vous sys­tem is dis­rup­ted and it no lon­ger func­tions pro­per­ly. Today, these inju­ries can be trea­ted using por­table or implan­table elec­tro­nic devices. Howe­ver, these devices are rigid and inflexible, which makes them incom­pa­tible with soft bio­lo­gi­cal tis­sue. Not only are these devices uncom­for­table for the patient, they can even cause inflam­ma­tion, which slows the hea­ling process.

The resear­chers’ flexible pros­the­sis com­prises a hydro­gel contai­ning hya­lu­ro­nic acid – a natu­ral poly­sac­cha­ride with mecha­ni­cal pro­per­ties simi­lar to those of soft tis­sue and known for its rege­ne­ra­tive pro­per­ties. To make the pros­the­sis elec­tri­cal­ly conduc­ting, they added, via covalent bonds, che­mi­cal com­pounds to it contai­ning hexa­go­nal rings that can accom­mo­date gold nano­par­ticles. Gold is also bio­com­pa­tible and intrin­si­cal­ly che­mi­cal­ly inert.

When the gel is injec­ted into the muscle tis­sue of a rat, the che­mi­cal bonds it contains are bro­ken. They qui­ck­ly re-form once the hydro­gel is fixed in the muscle, howe­ver. It is this inno­va­tive che­mis­try that enables it to rege­ne­rate dama­ged tis­sue. What is more, the gel does not ove­rac­ti­vate the animal’s immune sys­tem. It the­re­fore does not pro­duce fibrous scar tis­sue, as can be the case with conven­tio­nal implan­table prostheses.

The resear­chers found that the hydro­gel adheres to the per­iphe­ral nerves of the inju­red muscles in the rat’s hind leg. This means that the device can be connec­ted to elec­tri­cal wires and the scien­tists are able to acti­vate the muscle by sen­ding elec­tri­cal sti­mu­la­tion through the gel. Repea­ted sti­mu­la­tion enabled the rodents to walk short­ly after an injury.

Ulti­ma­te­ly, the resear­chers would like to apply their tech­nique to human muscle. Howe­ver, before they can do this, they will need to car­ry out stu­dies on ani­mals lar­ger than rodents to deter­mine whe­ther the hydro­gel can conduct elec­tri­ci­ty over lon­ger dis­tances4.

#4 Analysing how a table tennis ball bounces off a racket

Resear­chers in France have mea­su­red the speed of pro­gres­sion, rota­tion and rebound angle of a table ten­nis ball off a glass sur­face. Led by Jean-Chris­tophe Gémi­nard, CNRS research direc­tor at the phy­sics labo­ra­to­ry of the ENS in Lyon, the scien­tists fired the ball onto a glass plate while varying the angle and impact speed of the ball. They then mea­su­red the above para­me­ters by ana­ly­sing videos of how the ball inter­ac­ted with the plate.

The result : at angles of inci­dence typi­cal­ly less than 45 degrees, the ball rol­led (without sli­ding along the sur­face of the plate) com­ple­ting a frac­tion of a full turn, that is, less than one turn, before reboun­ding. At higher angles of inci­dence, the ball still slid as it left the sur­face, redu­cing its rota­tion after the bounce. The resear­chers explain that when boun­cing off a solid sur­face, such as a glass plate, the final rota­tion, speed and bounce angle of the ball are gover­ned sole­ly by the fric­tion bet­ween the ball and the sur­face. This result, they say, would be the same for a ball boun­cing off a real ping-pong table.

To make their expe­ri­ments more rea­lis­tic, Jean-Chris­tophe Gémi­nard and his col­leagues then repea­ted them using a racket cove­red with a stack of foam and elas­to­mer. To a cer­tain extent, this sce­na­rio pre­ven­ted the ball from sli­ding over the sur­face of the glass plate. Players capable of repro­du­cing the tech­niques des­cri­bed in this stu­dy will undoub­ted­ly have a signi­fi­cant advan­tage, say the researchers.

Final­ly, the scien­tists repro­du­ced their expe­ri­ments on sur­faces com­mon­ly used by table-ten­nis players in the real world, but to date the results of this part of their work have not yet been made public56.

Isabelle Dumé
1http://​dx​.doi​.org/​1​0​.​3​3​8​9​/​f​s​p​o​r​.​2​0​2​3​.​1​1​13952
2https://​www​.fron​tier​sin​.org/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​/​1​0​.​3​3​8​9​/​f​s​p​o​r​.​2​0​2​2​.​9​0​2​2​7​6​/full
3https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023–29261-0v
4https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023–06628‑x
5https://milyon.universite-lyon.fr/jean-christophe-geminard–193689.kjsp
6https://​jour​nals​.aps​.org/​p​r​e​/​a​b​s​t​r​a​c​t​/​1​0​.​1​1​0​3​/​P​h​y​s​R​e​v​E​.​1​0​7​.​0​55007

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate