Home / Chroniques / 4 technologies to enhance sporting performance
close up of woman feet running on track
π Science and technology π Health and biotech

4 technologies to enhance sporting performance

Douglas Powell
Douglas Powell
Director of the Breast Biomechanics Research Center (BBRC) in the College of Health Sciences at the University of Memphis
Donghee Son
Donghee Son
Professor in the School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering at Sungkyunkwan University (South Korea)
Mikyung Shin
Mikyung Shin
Associate professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Sungkyunkwan University (South Korea)
Hailey Fong
Hailey Fong
Researcher at Breast Biomechanics Research Center de l'Université de Memphis (États-Unis)
Jean-Christophe Géminard
Jean-Christophe Géminard
CNRS research director at the Physics Laboratory (ENS Lyon)
Key takeaways
  • A number of technologies are being developed around the world to enhance sporting performance.
  • Research has shown that a good sports bra is important for supporting the breasts and demonstrated how it affects the knee joint during running.
  • The work proves that sports bras, which have changed little over the last 50 years, should be considered as sports equipment in their own right.
  • Insoles fitted with sensors could be used to measure the progress and performance of athletes during various sporting activities.
  • Korean researchers have developed a conductive hydrogel capable of regenerating and reconnecting injured muscle to the nervous system.
  • These and other technologies being developed could help athletes progress and improve their performance.

#1 A good sports bra can increase running performance by 7%

As well as a good pair of run­ning shoes, a well-fit­ting sports bra that effi­ciently sup­ports the breasts is import­ant for female run­ners. It can help reduce breast pain and improve per­form­ance. When the breasts are not prop­erly sup­por­ted, the body com­pensates by pro­tect­ing them in oth­er ways. This com­pens­a­tion can reduce run­ning per­form­ance, increase the risk of injury and even lead to back and chest pain.

To bet­ter under­stand the role of a good sports bra on the bio­mech­an­ics of run­ning, a team of research­ers led by Douglas Pow­ell and Hailey Fong from the Breast Bio­mech­an­ics Research Cen­ter at the Uni­ver­sity of Mem­ph­is (USA) stud­ied how wear­ing a bra impacts knee joint stiff­ness dur­ing exer­cise. This bio­mech­an­ic­al meas­ure­ment provides inform­a­tion on the res­ist­ance of the knee joint to an applied force. To do this, the research­ers recruited 12 non-pro­fes­sion­al female run­ners aged 18–35 and had them wear two dif­fer­ent sports bras: one with high sup­port and the oth­er with low sup­port. A con­trol group did not wear a bra at all.

Each par­ti­cipant ran on a tread­mill equipped with force detect­ors for three minutes. The research­ers filmed the run­ners using a 10-cam­era motion cap­ture sys­tem. Retrore­flect­ive mark­ers placed on the run­ners’ bod­ies also tracked their move­ments. The research­ers then used soft­ware that they had spe­cially developed in this work to cal­cu­late the excur­sions of the knee joint (flex­ions, exten­sions and rota­tions) on the basis of the images they obtained. They also mon­itored chest move­ment dur­ing the exercise.

The exper­i­ments revealed that when breast sup­port was high­er, the knee joint was more rigid, thanks to smal­ler joint excur­sions. Com­pared with the con­trol group, the low- and high-con­tain­ment bras increased knee joint stiff­ness by 2% and 5% respect­ively. Over­all, a high sup­port sports bra appeared to improve run­ning per­form­ance by 7%. The research also revealed that improve­ments in run­ning per­form­ance with high sup­port sports bras was strongly cor­rel­ated with breast size: women with lar­ger breasts benefited more in terms of run­ning performance.

Over the last 50 years, bra design has changed little, explains Douglas Pow­ell: “our res­ults, com­bined with those of pre­vi­ous stud­ies, show that sports bras should be con­sidered not just as appar­el, but as sports equip­ment in their own right.”12.

#2 3D-printed insoles to assess athletes’ performance

In top-level sport, a frac­tion of a second can make all the dif­fer­ence. Made-to-meas­ure insoles can improve sport­ing per­form­ance and research­ers at Empa, ETH Zurich and EPFL, all in Switzer­land, have developed a device that is much more soph­ist­ic­ated than a simple insert. The new insole com­prises pres­sure and shear sensors that can meas­ure these para­met­ers dir­ectly on the sole of the foot dur­ing any type of phys­ic­al activity.

“The pres­sures recor­ded can be used to determ­ine wheth­er a per­son is walk­ing, run­ning, or climb­ing stairs. It’s even pos­sible to determ­ine wheth­er they’re car­ry­ing a heavy load on their back, in which case the pres­sure shifts more towards the heel,” explains Gil­berto Siqueira, pro­ject lead­er and research­er at Empa and ETH­’s Com­plex Mater­i­als Laboratory.

The soles were fab­ric­ated using a 3D print­er, known as an extruder. The base of the sole is made from a mix­ture of sil­ic­one and cel­lu­lose nan­o­particles. A con­duct­ive ink con­tain­ing sil­ver is then prin­ted atop this first lay­er. The sensors, which are piezo­elec­tric, con­vert mech­an­ic­al pres­sure into elec­tric­al sig­nals. These are prin­ted on the con­duct­ing part of the sole, where the pres­sure exer­ted by the foot is greatest. The ensemble is pro­tec­ted by a final lay­er of sil­ic­one. An inter­face for read­ing the sig­nals gen­er­ated, inser­ted into the sole, com­pletes the device.

As well as Empa, ETH Zurich and EPFL, the Centre Hos­pit­al­i­er Uni­versitaire Vau­dois (CHUV) and the ortho­ped­ics com­pany Numo were also involved in this work. Such insoles could be used by ath­letes to meas­ure their pro­gress dur­ing train­ing and their per­form­ance in gen­er­al3.

#3 An electrically conductive hydrogel could help regenerate muscle

Research­ers at the Insti­tute of Basic Sci­ence (IBS) in South Korea have developed a new tis­sue pros­thes­is made from a con­duct­ive hydro­gel that can be injec­ted dir­ectly into an injured muscle to regen­er­ate it and recon­nect it to the nervous sys­tem. This pros­thes­is has enabled rats with torn hind limbs to walk again.

Muscle injur­ies such as strains or tears are com­mon sports injur­ies. When a muscle is torn, its elec­tric­al com­mu­nic­a­tion with the nervous sys­tem is dis­rup­ted and it no longer func­tions prop­erly. Today, these injur­ies can be treated using port­able or implant­able elec­tron­ic devices. How­ever, these devices are rigid and inflex­ible, which makes them incom­pat­ible with soft bio­lo­gic­al tis­sue. Not only are these devices uncom­fort­able for the patient, they can even cause inflam­ma­tion, which slows the heal­ing process.

The research­ers’ flex­ible pros­thes­is com­prises a hydro­gel con­tain­ing hya­lur­on­ic acid – a nat­ur­al poly­sac­char­ide with mech­an­ic­al prop­er­ties sim­il­ar to those of soft tis­sue and known for its regen­er­at­ive prop­er­ties. To make the pros­thes­is elec­tric­ally con­duct­ing, they added, via cova­lent bonds, chem­ic­al com­pounds to it con­tain­ing hexagon­al rings that can accom­mod­ate gold nan­o­particles. Gold is also biocom­pat­ible and intrins­ic­ally chem­ic­ally inert.

When the gel is injec­ted into the muscle tis­sue of a rat, the chem­ic­al bonds it con­tains are broken. They quickly re-form once the hydro­gel is fixed in the muscle, how­ever. It is this innov­at­ive chem­istry that enables it to regen­er­ate dam­aged tis­sue. What is more, the gel does not over­activ­ate the animal’s immune sys­tem. It there­fore does not pro­duce fibrous scar tis­sue, as can be the case with con­ven­tion­al implant­able prostheses.

The research­ers found that the hydro­gel adheres to the peri­pher­al nerves of the injured muscles in the rat’s hind leg. This means that the device can be con­nec­ted to elec­tric­al wires and the sci­ent­ists are able to activ­ate the muscle by send­ing elec­tric­al stim­u­la­tion through the gel. Repeated stim­u­la­tion enabled the rodents to walk shortly after an injury.

Ulti­mately, the research­ers would like to apply their tech­nique to human muscle. How­ever, before they can do this, they will need to carry out stud­ies on anim­als lar­ger than rodents to determ­ine wheth­er the hydro­gel can con­duct elec­tri­city over longer dis­tances4.

#4 Analysing how a table tennis ball bounces off a racket

Research­ers in France have meas­ured the speed of pro­gres­sion, rota­tion and rebound angle of a table ten­nis ball off a glass sur­face. Led by Jean-Chris­tophe Géminard, CNRS research dir­ect­or at the phys­ics labor­at­ory of the ENS in Lyon, the sci­ent­ists fired the ball onto a glass plate while vary­ing the angle and impact speed of the ball. They then meas­ured the above para­met­ers by ana­lys­ing videos of how the ball inter­ac­ted with the plate.

The res­ult: at angles of incid­ence typ­ic­ally less than 45 degrees, the ball rolled (without slid­ing along the sur­face of the plate) com­plet­ing a frac­tion of a full turn, that is, less than one turn, before rebound­ing. At high­er angles of incid­ence, the ball still slid as it left the sur­face, redu­cing its rota­tion after the bounce. The research­ers explain that when boun­cing off a sol­id sur­face, such as a glass plate, the final rota­tion, speed and bounce angle of the ball are gov­erned solely by the fric­tion between the ball and the sur­face. This res­ult, they say, would be the same for a ball boun­cing off a real ping-pong table.

To make their exper­i­ments more real­ist­ic, Jean-Chris­tophe Géminard and his col­leagues then repeated them using a rack­et covered with a stack of foam and elast­omer. To a cer­tain extent, this scen­ario pre­ven­ted the ball from slid­ing over the sur­face of the glass plate. Play­ers cap­able of repro­du­cing the tech­niques described in this study will undoubtedly have a sig­ni­fic­ant advant­age, say the researchers.

Finally, the sci­ent­ists repro­duced their exper­i­ments on sur­faces com­monly used by table-ten­nis play­ers in the real world, but to date the res­ults of this part of their work have not yet been made pub­lic56.

Isabelle Dumé
1http://​dx​.doi​.org/​1​0​.​3​3​8​9​/​f​s​p​o​r​.​2​0​2​3​.​1​1​13952
2https://​www​.fron​ti​ersin​.org/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​/​1​0​.​3​3​8​9​/​f​s​p​o​r​.​2​0​2​2​.​9​0​2​2​7​6​/full
3https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023–29261-0v
4https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023–06628‑x
5https://milyon.universite-lyon.fr/jean-christophe-geminard–193689.kjsp
6https://​journ​als​.aps​.org/​p​r​e​/​a​b​s​t​r​a​c​t​/​1​0​.​1​1​0​3​/​P​h​y​s​R​e​v​E​.​1​0​7​.​0​55007

Support accurate information rooted in the scientific method.

Donate