Home / Chroniques / Why is stabilisation of floating wind turbines holding back their development?
Aerial View of Floating Wind Turbines at Sunset
Généré par l'IA / Generated using AI
π Energy

Why is stabilisation of floating wind turbines holding back their development?

pastur_polemeca2025_
Luc Pastur
Associate Professor in Fluid Mechanics at ENSTA (IP Paris)
Key takeaways
  • By 2035, the Multiannual Energy Plan aims to increase electricity generation from offshore wind to around 59 TWh.
  • Depending on the depth of the seabed, there are two main types of offshore wind turbines: fixed-bottom (less than 70 m) and floating (deeper than 70 m).
  • Stabilisation is one of the challenges facing floating wind turbines, as currents, waves and winds cause the structure to move in various ways: rolling, pitching and heaving
  • The heave of a floating or semi-floating wind turbine refers to a vertical movement of the structure.
  • Active and passive techniques already exist to mitigate heave, such as heave plates or utilising the rotation of the turbine blades to counterbalance the movement.

The Mul­tian­nu­al Energy Pro­gramme aims to increase elec­tri­city gen­er­a­tion from off­shore wind to around 59 TWh by 2035, thereby exceed­ing cur­rent onshore wind gen­er­a­tion1. At sea, whilst float­ing wind tur­bines offer sig­ni­fic­ant poten­tial for France, only a few pilot wind farms have been com­mis­sioned to date. France’s cur­rent wind farms con­sist of tur­bines fixed to the seabed. To bet­ter under­stand the mari­time chal­lenges facing the wind power sec­tor, Luc Pas­tur, an asso­ci­ate pro­fess­or at ENSTA and a spe­cial­ist in flu­id mech­an­ics, answers our questions.

What technological barriers are holding back the development of floating wind power?

Luc Pas­tur. Float­ing wind power is not yet com­mer­cially viable, as sta­bil­ising the wind tur­bines remains one of the main chal­lenges. Cur­rents, waves and winds cause the struc­ture to move in vari­ous ways: rolling, pitch­ing and heav­ing – the lat­ter being par­tic­u­larly dam­aging. This causes struc­tur­al fatigue, thereby accel­er­at­ing age­ing whilst redu­cing energy pro­duc­tion effi­ciency. Man­u­fac­tur­ers are there­fore seek­ing to min­im­ise these move­ments, par­tic­u­larly to meet the per­form­ance require­ments of operators.

Off­shore wind farms

There are two main types of off­shore wind tur­bine: fixed-bot­tom wind tur­bines, for sea depths of less than 70 metres; and float­ing wind tur­bines, which are the only viable option where the seabed is deep­er than 70 metres2. Fixed and float­ing wind tur­bines can coex­ist with­in the same range of seabed depths, where these are between 50 and 70 metres. In total, there are four types of float­ing wind tur­bine, which dif­fer accord­ing to the type of float they use. To date, float­ing wind power is not a fully developed indus­tri­al sec­tor, and all install­a­tions cur­rently in oper­a­tion in France are fixed-bot­tom wind tur­bines. In the fourth quarter of 2025, 5.7 TWh of elec­tri­city was gen­er­ated by off­shore wind tur­bines, out of a total of 16.49 TWh pro­duced by the vari­ous wind farms3.

What is heave?

Heave is a ver­tic­al move­ment of the wind tur­bine, which can be caused by adverse sea con­di­tions or winds. A float­ing wind tur­bine is a struc­ture that oscil­lates in the wave field at its own nat­ur­al fre­quency. When the swell has the same fre­quency as the wind tur­bine [editor’s note: i.e. the same num­ber of oscil­la­tions per unit of time], the oscil­lat­ing motion enters res­on­ance: the oscil­la­tions are then amp­li­fied. This becomes prob­lem­at­ic when the motion exceeds a threshold amp­litude defined by the man­u­fac­turer. Heav­ing affects all float­ing wind tur­bines, but semi-sub­mers­ibles are par­tic­u­larly vulnerable.

Are there any solutions to mitigate these vertical movements?

Yes, one of the pre­ferred solu­tions is the addi­tion of heave plates. These large steel plates, sev­er­al cen­ti­metres thick, are placed beneath the floats. When the wind tur­bine oscil­lates ver­tic­ally, it drags a mass of water with it, which increases the turbine’s iner­tia, mak­ing it harder to set in motion. These plates also help to dampen the oscil­la­tions thanks to the flow pat­terns they gen­er­ate around them.

So, what exactly is happening?

Two phys­ic­al mech­an­isms are at work. On the one hand, the oscil­lat­ing motion of the plate in the flu­id [editor’s note: sea­wa­ter] induces areas of low pres­sure beneath the plate. This gen­er­ates an ini­tial struc­ture: what is known as form drag. On the oth­er hand, plate-edge vor­tices are cyc­lic­ally released above and below the oscil­lat­ing plate. All these flow struc­tures take with them a por­tion of the kin­et­ic energy drawn from the plate’s motion, which helps to dampen the plate’s motion.

Why are these plates still being researched?

Sci­ent­ists are work­ing to gain a bet­ter under­stand­ing of the flow struc­tures induced by heave plates. By improv­ing our under­stand­ing of the phys­ic­al mech­an­isms at work in damp­ing the oscil­la­tions of off­shore struc­tures, we will be able to devise even more effect­ive devices.

We have, for example, found that damp­ing is optim­al when the plate is per­for­ated with holes cov­er­ing 10 % of its sur­face area. The holes give rise to a new effect dur­ing the plate’s ver­tic­al oscil­la­tion: flu­id jets are pro­duced through the holes. The shear­ing res­ult­ing from these flow struc­tures degen­er­ates into tur­bu­lence and gives rise to a mul­ti­tude of vor­tic­al struc­tures, right down to very small scales. The smal­lest vor­tices are ulti­mately dis­sip­ated vis­cously. This cas­cade of energy, drawn from the energy of the plate’s oscil­lat­ory motion, is likely to con­sti­tute an import­ant pro­cess in the damp­ing mechanisms.

Are there other ways to reduce heave?

Heave plates are a pass­ive damp­ing tech­nique that does not require an extern­al energy source. Act­ive tech­niques do exist; not­ably, it is pos­sible to coun­ter­bal­ance heave by con­trolling the rota­tion of the blades via the rotor. This relies on an act­ive con­trol sys­tem, which there­fore con­sumes energy, and acts on the tur­bine and blade shafts based on meas­ure­ments taken of the float­ing structure’s move­ment. How­ever, as this tech­nique is more expens­ive and places great­er strain on the rotor, it should prob­ably be regarded as a sup­ple­ment to heave plates.

Bey­ond these tech­no­lo­gic­al hurdles, the devel­op­ment of float­ing wind tur­bines requires care­ful con­sid­er­a­tion of the entire indus­tri­al chain. Pro­duc­tion sites, the cost of mater­i­als, their trans­port, the assembly of the tur­bines, off­shore moor­ing, etc. all these stages of the value chain must be care­fully con­sidered to ensure the com­mer­cial devel­op­ment of the sector.

Interview by Anaïs Maréchal
1https://​www​.eco​nomie​.gouv​.fr/​f​i​l​e​s​/​f​i​l​e​s​/​2​0​2​6​/​p​p​e​3​.​p​d​f​?​v​=​1​7​7​1​4​05459, accessed on 12 Octo­ber 2026.↑
2https://​www​.eolien​nesen​mer​.fr/​g​e​n​e​r​a​l​i​t​e​s​-​e​o​l​i​e​n​n​e​s​-​e​n​-​m​e​r​/​t​e​c​h​n​o​logie, accessed on 12 Octo­ber 2026.↑
3https://​www​.stat​istiques​.develop​pe​ment​-dur​able​.gouv​.fr/​t​a​b​l​e​a​u​-​d​e​-​b​o​r​d​-​e​o​l​i​e​n​-​q​u​a​t​r​i​e​m​e​-​t​r​i​m​e​s​t​r​e​-2025, accessed on 12 Octo­ber 2026.↑

Our world through the lens of science. Every week, in your inbox.

Get the newsletter